Bill McKibben in the New York Review of Books:
During the last year, momentum has finally begun to build for taking action against global warming by putting limits on carbon emissions and then reducing them. Driven by ever-more-dire scientific reports, Congress has, for the first time, begun debating ambitious targets for carbon reduction. Al Gore, in his recent Live Earth concerts, announced that he will work to see an international treaty signed by the end of 2009. Even President Bush has recently reversed his previous opposition and summoned the leaders of all the top carbon-emitting countries to a series of conferences designed to yield some form of limits on CO2.
More here.
McKibben asks an interesting question: Why does Lomborg compare the efficacy of funding to stop GW with the priorities of things such as fighting malaria?
Is Lomborg just trying to make a point about priorities, or is he (as E.O. Wilson said) still stuck in sordid messes of arguments?
Posted by: beajerry | Friday, September 21, 2007 at 05:09 AM
bea---
I think it will be a non issue when Lomborg is sorting through the detritus of a collapsed civilization to obtain enough calories to fight and live.
Nature has a way of batting last.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Saturday, September 22, 2007 at 04:18 PM