Wednesday, November 30, 2005
STRANGE FITS OF PASSION: Wordsworth’s revolution
Adam Kirsch in The New Yorker:
Has there ever been a great poet as tempting to laugh at as William Wordsworth? The tradition of mocking him is as old as the tradition of revering him. In 1807, when Wordsworth published “Poems, in Two Volumes,” the fashionable reviewers competed in the ingenuity of their scorn. Francis Jeffrey, the critical dictator of the Edinburgh Review, declared that “if the printing of such trash as this be not felt as an insult on the public taste, we are afraid it cannot be insulted.” Jeffrey remained the chief bane of Wordsworth’s career—in 1814, his review of “The Excursion,” a nine-thousand-line epic, began with an airy “This will never do”—but he was just one of many who felt the need to cut the poet down to size. “For nearly twenty years,” Samuel Taylor Coleridge complained in “Biographia Literaria,” Wordsworth’s poems “have well-nigh engrossed criticism, as the main, if not the only, butt of review, magazine, pamphlet, poem, and paragraph.”
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:49 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d83522c4dc53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference STRANGE FITS OF PASSION: Wordsworth’s revolution: