| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Proposition 8 and the Blame Game | Main | Perceptions »

November 17, 2008

Open Letter to America from a Prodigal Daughter

by T. K. Armistead

For those that are not familiar with the story of the prodigal son it seemed to have gone this way. A man had two sons, the younger son demanded his share of his inheritance while his father is still living, and went off to a distant country where he "wasted his substance with riotous living", and eventually had to take work as a swine herder --most likely a low point, because swine are not kosher in Judaism--. There he came to his senses, and decided to return home and threw himself on his father's mercy, thinking that even if his father decided to disown him, that being one of his servants was still far better than tending pigs. But when he returned home, his father greeted him with open arms, and hardly gave him a chance to express his repentance; he killed a fatted calf to celebrate his return. The older brother becomes jealous at the favored treatment of his faithless brother and upset at the lack of reward for his own faithfulness. But the father responded:

Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine. It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found. -- (Luke 15:32, KJV)

As an expatriate black American living deep in the heart of Western Europe I, like many others had turned my back and dulled my heart to America. After the election of George W. Bush and the subsequent re-election I believed that we, as a country lost its way. I couldn’t identify with any of the new values of the last eight years and felt I was no longer useful to the cause of the country. I stunted my patriotism and began to make a life in Europe with only passing interest and little attention paid to the country I once lived in. I became an American in name only, a blue passport holder, a cynic, a critic to all American interests both foreign and domestic. I became disenchanted with America and its many phrases in hyperbole. “We are the greatest nation on earth” people would exclaim but to outsiders the “greatest” nation on earth brought terror and fear. America seemed hell bent on separating the world into to halves and I felt I had the straddle the two halves surreptitiously.

After 9/11 there was a sense of love for the gentle giant that was wounded unjustly, everyone I met on the streets of Italy rallied around my family. They wanted to hold us and take care of us. We were flooded with stories of how someone’s uncle was rescued from starvation by some American solider or how a friend of a friend got a little money from his American friend and that helped start a business. This was the America they knew and now simply because of my nationality, I was now like family. My landlord, at the time, lived in America for a while and said this me, with tears in his eyes and the thickest Neapolitan accent you could imagine: “America always helps everyone out and now it is time for her to be helped, if you need anything at any time just ask to me”. I never took him up on the offer, because I had no family lost and zero damage to any property I left back in the States. But the sentiment was taken and we moved on.

Some of the patriotism came back after 9/11, I began to watch the news and saw how the people of the Nation rallied around one other. It was beautiful, it was hopeful, I was wrong. By the end of 2001 we not only made some bad decisions but, in my opinion, were set on the wrong track completely. All of the sympathy we earned with 9/11 began to erode into vitriolic attacks on America and conversations, prefaced with: “I know it’s not you but…” I became an unwilling surrogate for all the anger and confusion aimed at the U.S. I retreated further into my apathy being momentarily released from it by 9/11. “Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.”

Life continued as normal with the regular blunders, hypocrisies and mishaps from the Bush Administration, then on a normal day I happened to turn on the Oprah Winfrey show—through the miracle of satellite television-- and caught a glimpse of a fellow by the name of Barrack Obama. I was curious and assumed like most people that he was a bit audacious, hopeful, naïve and kind of cute. I followed politics, but only as a curiosity, I lost all hope in the system and would live as most expat Americans do, quietly praying never to be sent ‘home’. But I have to say as the election drew to a close I began to get on board with the big idea of small change and felt like maybe this could happen. The night of the election I put my children to bed, kissed my husband and prepared for the long night ahead. I watched as the states began stacking up in Barack Obamas favor and grew more positive with each one. When the election was called at 11pm eastern time, 6am my time, I dropped to my knees a wept. I wept for all my relatives who felt fear in believing, I wept for all the men who had to wear the “I am a man” signs in the south, I wept for the WWII vets who came home from relieving oppression only to face it at home, I wept in shame for doubting my country, I wept for the challenge of a hopeful man against the winds of doubt and lastly I wept for the knowledge that the Whitehouse, I visited as a child, will now have a family that resides in it that looks like mine. As a matter of fact I tear up at every mention of President-elect Barack Obama because I am proud, I am on-board with hope, and I am back to loving the country I almost gave up on. Hopefully she welcomes me back…

I would like to end this open letter to America the way I did when I woke my children up the day after the election, please forgive the sentimentality because this really happened, it went like this: Good morning girls, Barack Obama won last night and I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands ONE nation under God INDIVISIBLE with liberty and justice for ALL. It was a little corny but necessary. Oh and there is no need to kill that fatted calf for me because I’m a vegetarian.

Respectfully,

A Former Prodigal Daughter

Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:05 AM | Permalink

Comments

"Good morning girls, Barack Obama won last night and I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands ONE nation under God INDIVISIBLE with liberty and justice for ALL."

Please, enough with the propaganda; enough with the symbols and wonderful rhetoric, which so often ends up being not a prelude to change but a *substitute* for it (the American drug of choice). It's this Hollywood-style appeal to the emotions and to easy, self-flattering sentiment that keeps getting the country in trouble, over and over again. A call for some *sobriety*, for a change, is not a cynical reflex.

Americans are not "special"... they're like any other people on earth. Their *government* is "special" to the extent that it seems to be intent on global empire, their language (English, nominally) is "special" because it's the global language of business and their exported pop culture is "special" to the extent that it somehow involves a confluence of the other two, above-mentioned factors.

One of the most dangerous aspects of GW (beyond even his trademark ignorance) was his obvious, unshakeable belief in his own "specialness"... please do remember that one can only be "special" in contrast to others. An America that hold itself as "special" holds the rest of the world as not. This is a very damaging, and threatening, delusion.

BTW: whenever I come across that repulsive "patriotism" meme in a German (which is very rare, thankgodz), I am rightly alarmed: it's just as foolish in Americans; your allegiance should be to the species, at the very least; to the planet, ideally. How many times do we have to learn this lesson?

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Nov 17, 2008 6:36:48 AM

****After Obama's win, white backlash festers in US
By Patrik Jonsson

Atlanta – In rural Georgia, a group of high-schoolers gets a visit from the Secret Service after posting "inappropriate" comments about President-elect Barack Obama on the Web. In Raleigh, N.C., four college students admit to spraying race-tinged graffiti in a pedestrian tunnel after the election. On Nov. 6, a cross burns on the lawn of a biracial couple in Apolacon Township, Pa.

The election of America's first black president has triggered more than 200 hate-related incidents, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center – a record in modern presidential elections. Moreover, the white nationalist movement, bemoaning an election that confirmed voters' comfort with a multiracial demography, expects Mr. Obama's election to be a potent recruiting tool – one that watchdog groups warn could give new impetus to a mostly defanged fringe element.

Most election-related threats have so far been little more than juvenile pranks. But the political marginalization of certain Southern whites, economic distress in rural areas, and a White House occupant who symbolizes a multiethnic United States could combine to produce a backlash against what some have heralded as the dawn of a postracial America. In some parts of the South, there's even talk of secession.

"Most of this movement is not violent, but there is a substantive underbelly that is violent and does try to make a bridge to people who feel disenfranchised," says Brian Levin of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino. "The question is: Will this swirl become a tornado or just an ill wind? We're not there yet, but there's dust on the horizon, a swirling of wind, and the atmospherics are getting put together for [conflict]."

Though postelection racist incidents haven't posed any real danger to society or the president-elect, law enforcement is taking note.

"We're trying to be out there at the cutting edge of this and trying to stay ahead of groups that are emerging," says Special Agent Darrin Blackford, a spokesman for the Secret Service, which guards the US president.

"Anytime you start seeing [extremist propaganda] floating around, you have to be concerned," adds Lt. Gary Thornberry of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol, a member of the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force. "As far as it being an alarmist situation, I don't see that yet. From a law enforcement point of view, you have to be careful, because it's not illegal to have an ideology."

After sparking conflict and showdowns in the 1990s – think Ruby Ridge, Waco, the Oklahoma City bombing – white supremacist and nationalist groups began this century largely splintered and powerless. Though high immigration levels helped boost the number of hate groups from 602 in 2000 to 888 in 2007, key leaders of such groups had died, been imprisoned, or were otherwise marginalized.

But postelection, at least two white nationalist websites – Stormfront and the Council of Conservative Citizens – report their servers have crashed because of heavy traffic. The League of the South, a secessionist group, says Web hits jumped from 50,000 a month to 300,000 since Nov. 4, and its phones are ringing off the hook.

"The vitriol is flailing out shotgun-style," says Mr. Levin. "They recognize Obama as a tipping point, the perfect storm in the narrative of the hate world – the apocalypse that they've been moaning about has come true."

Supremacist propaganda is already on the upswing. In Oklahoma, fringe groups have distributed anti-Obama propaganda through newspapers and taped it to home mail boxes. Ugly incidents such as cross-burnings, assassination betting pools, and Obama effigies are also being reported from Maine to Alabama.

The Ku Klux Klan has been tied to recent news events, as well. Two Tennessee men implicated for plotting to kill 88 black men, including Obama, were tied to the KKK chapter whose leader was convicted in a civil trial in Brandenburg, Ky., last week, for inciting violence. The murder last week in Louisiana of a KKK initiate, allegedly killed after trying to back out of joining, came at the hands of a new group called Sons of Dixie, authorities say.

"We're not looking at a race war or anything close to it, but ... what we are seeing now is undeniably a fairly major backlash by some subset of the white population," says Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Report in Montomgery, Ala. "Many whites feel that the country their forefathers built has been ... stolen from them, so there's in some places a real boiling rage, and that can only become worse as more people lose jobs."

In an election in which barely 20 percent of native Southern whites in Deep South states voted for Obama, the newly apparent political clout of "outsiders" and people of color has been unnerving to some.

"In states like Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama, there was extraordinary racial polarization in the vote," says Merle Black, a political scientist at Emory University in Atlanta. "Black Americans really do believe that Obama is going to represent their interests and views in ways that they haven't been before, and, in the Deep South, whites feel exactly the opposite."

But for nonviolent secessionist groups like the League of the South, the hope is for a more vigorous debate about the direction of the US and the South's role in it, says Michael Tuggle, a League blogger in North Carolina.

Mr. Tuggle says his group isn't looking for an 1860-style secession but, rather, a model that Spain, for one, is moving toward, in which "there's a great deal of autonomy for constituent regions" – a foil to what is seen as unchecked, dangerous federal power in Washington.

"To a lot of people, the idea of secession doesn't seem so crazy anymore," says Tuggle. "People are talking about how left out they feel, ... and they feel that something strange and radical has taken over our country."

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Nov 17, 2008 6:52:15 AM

The post is somewhat moving, especially as it was composed by a black American BUT...

"Nationalism" is different from "patriotism". Adoration of a country's government, justice military power, economic power, etc. is a different thing from patriotism: love of a country because it is yours, because you grew up there, because it is your home and its customs, for better or worse, shaped what you are. Chesterton's line comes back to me: "'My country right or wrong' is much like saying 'my mother, drunk or sober'".

Love of a country because it elected Barack Obama, however sensible or commendable that was, is of the same level as loving a country for other superficial distinctions, loving it for its huge army, for its large corporations, for its pop culture...

Posted by: Dimitrios | Nov 17, 2008 6:56:39 AM

Dimitrios:

We certainly agree, for the most part, but:

"Nationalism" is different from "patriotism".

The "difference" is one of inflection; ie, spin. "Patriotism" means "us" and "nationalism" means "them".

na•tion•al•ism (nash‚ƒ nl izƒm, nash‚nƒ liz-) n.1. devotion and loyalty to one's own nation; patriotism.

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Nov 17, 2008 7:09:43 AM

Nationalism, Dimitrios, is just somebody else's patriotism.

And apparently we will have to learn the lesson forever. US patriotic fantasies are imbued with a religious tenor and intensity, and if history is a guide, it's evident that this kind of delusions hardly ever die, unless in the face of continued humiliation.


Posted by: Pepito | Nov 17, 2008 7:25:28 AM

My friends, perhaps it is regrettable, but I've found that humans aren't Vulcans.
I'm sorry, I don't mean to be trite. It's just that love of one's own- oneself, one's family, one's neighborhood, one's country- is part and parcel of what being human is all about. Even the most progressive of movements uses the slogan "think globally, act locally"
The strongest opposition to imperialism throughout history had been patriotism and "nationalism": Greek, Serbian and Bulgarian resistance to the Ottoman Turks; American, and later Indian nationalism against the British Empire, Algerian nationalism against the French, as well as Vietnamese against both French and American imperialism. Even during the German invasion of the Soviet Union, resistance was reinforced by appeals to "Holy Mother Russia", rather than appeals to Worker's Power, the International Brotherhood of Humanity, and the Glorious Five Year Plan.
Suppose that a "global governance cooperative" of some sort were to come into being, a "United Nations with teeth" worthy of becoming a focus of "loyalty to the human race". This loyalty will seem to its partisans as beneficial to the ruled as the British Empire looked to Victorian imperialists as Kipling, Rhodes, and even Bernard Shaw and H.G. Wells(progressive socialists who saw the European empires as test beds for the future world state's "efficiency").
This, however will be seen as just another imperialism by many Greeks, Indians, Algerians and Vietnamese. Many Americans too, I'll warrant: Not just the black helicopter crowd, but quite a few anti-globalists; I suspect any world state would look less like Stalinworld and more like the vision in Arthur Jensen's speech to Howard Beale in the movie "Network":

"We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime. And our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there's no war or famine, oppression or brutality -- one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused."

Somehow, I can see many of the most progressive of people objecting to this type of "nationalism"

Posted by: Dimitrios | Nov 17, 2008 8:25:13 AM

This post furthers a common perspective - we have elected a symbol. A symbol that has not accomplished anything other than convincing us that he is a powerful symbol. At a very trying time for the country. Just as developing countries can catch up with the modern world very fast, things can degenerate much further in four years than people think. Check out Argentina, which used to be a real country. Now it is a place where the government confiscates peoples' pensions wholesale. Good luck.

Posted by: David | Nov 17, 2008 10:34:01 PM

Just a little footnote on the word "prodigal"-- although because of the Bible story people think it means repentant,or else someone who returns, it actually means wasteful, recklessly extravagant, someone who squanders his gifts, as the son in the story did, before he came to his senses.

Posted by: Marilyn Terrell | Nov 18, 2008 1:22:09 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    Pete Chapman on Sunday Poem

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Jeff Strabone on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Victoria Nwobodo on Facebook Poetry – Oxymoron or Hamburger-Chain Art?

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Joe Y on Summer time and the eating is easy

    hmmm on Losing the Plot (The Hotel)

    Cyrus Hall on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Louise Gordon on In God's name

    Manisha Verma on India, China and the polemics of the East

    sw on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    J. Hawkins on In God's name

    kerg on The Israeli thought-police is here

    J. Hawkins on The Israeli thought-police is here

    IJ on The Israeli thought-police is here

    andy on Summer time and the eating is easy

    DRK on In God's name

    Elatia Harris on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Tasnim on Perceptions

    Frances Madeson on 'What's exciting is that writing has become a weapon'

    Anonymous on India, China and the polemics of the East

    Cyrus Hall on The Israeli thought-police is here

    hidflect on Perceptions

    aditya dev sood on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Azra Raza on Perceptions

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed