November 12, 2008
camille paglia loves palin and the "powerful clarity of consciousness in her eyes"
I like Sarah Palin, and I've heartily enjoyed her arrival on the national stage. As a career classroom teacher, I can see how smart she is -- and quite frankly, I think the people who don't see it are the stupid ones, wrapped in the fuzzy mummy-gauze of their own worn-out partisan dogma. So she doesn't speak the King's English -- big whoop! There is a powerful clarity of consciousness in her eyes. She uses language with the jumps, breaks and rippling momentum of a be-bop saxophonist. I stand on what I said (as a staunch pro-choice advocate) in my last two columns -- that Palin as a pro-life wife, mother and ambitious professional represents the next big shift in feminism. Pro-life women will save feminism by expanding it, particularly into the more traditional Third World.As for the Democrats who sneered and howled that Palin was unprepared to be a vice-presidential nominee -- what navel-gazing hypocrisy! What protests were raised in the party or mainstream media when John Edwards, with vastly less political experience than Palin, got John Kerry's nod for veep four years ago? And Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, for whom I lobbied to be Obama's pick and who was on everyone's short list for months, has a record indistinguishable from Palin's. Whatever knowledge deficit Palin has about the federal bureaucracy or international affairs (outside the normal purview of governors) will hopefully be remedied during the next eight years of the Obama presidencies.
more from Salon here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 08:45 PM | Permalink











Comments
Yes, well, Camille and Sarah operate at about the same level of consciousness.
Posted by: hysperia | Nov 12, 2008 9:46:03 PM
Rallying behind Mrs. Palin is a mistake for feminists and republicans. Unless she spends the next four years at University...
The media gave more coverage to Palin's shortcoming's than Obama's because Palin's are more drastic and indicate an inability to perform well in the position sought.
I do not see a clarity of consciousness in this woman's eyes... I see ignorance. I see a lack of understanding of legislative process (boiling a roadmap for reform down to "What would a couple of Mavericks do?").
Please, republicans and feminists, drop it. She is not the candidate we're looking for. If her drones of ill-informed supporters on the religious right elect her the next republican candidate, sensible conservatives will be further isolated and more likely to support another moderate democrat.
Drop it.
Posted by: seanpark | Nov 12, 2008 10:49:23 PM
I remember Camille Paglia from way, way back. She wasn't always famous. In the beginning, she was a charming, hard-driving contrarian with a way of looking at things and people that was guaranteed to be different from your own, whoever you were. This worked for her, as we know. What could be more contrarian, more counter-intuitive, than to speak and write of Sarah Palin as Paglia has now done? To take a politician with wax museum eyes, as praise those orbs as radiant with intelligence? To take a woman who is shrewd without being curious, and exalt her for her clarity?
Message to Paglia: Sorry, Camille -- it won't wash. Maybe you'd like to do for Sarah what you helped to do for Madonna, but 25 years later, I think it's all about riding the coattails of a woman people can't seem to stop talking about. If you want me to take you seriously -- one more time -- please find an SEO tool that is thrilling, cogent, and not too outlandish to be plausibly feminist. RuPaul, maybe. Cleaving unto Palin makes you look awfully hard up, iconwise.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Nov 12, 2008 11:18:39 PM
So we're calling that "deer in the headlights," glassy eyed gaze of the true believer "clarity of consciousness" now. Good to know.
Yes, yes, Palin's brand of soft-fascism, wrapped in a MILF wrapper is just what the world needs.
Posted by: mr_goodbar | Nov 12, 2008 11:44:05 PM
You've gotta be kiddin' right? Who cares where she stands on reproductive rights - I simply wouldn't want someone who can seriously hold to the view that the earth is 6000 years old and that genetic research is a waste of time holding ANY reins of power. Period. The woman enshrines wilful ignorance, makes it her own and stands proud of it. If you Camille, like what you see and all that it entails I suggest you, Sarah and any other's who share your adoration find another planet. This one faces monumentous peril without your special brand of 'consciousness'.
Posted by: MattInOz | Nov 13, 2008 12:15:08 AM
If I weren't sure already, news that Camille Paglia's into Sarah Palin were certainly seal the deal. I learned decades ago that whatever Camille wanted, I should run the other way.
Posted by: newswriter | Nov 13, 2008 12:40:27 AM
I'd like to see columnists fawn over a woman who believes in creationism and the end of days, who opposes biological research because sometimes it takes place in France, who denies global warming, who can't name a single newspaper...
...who's physically unattractive. That will be a big day for feminism.
Posted by: fuzzymummygauze | Nov 13, 2008 1:52:50 AM
How is a person who enjoys shooting wolves from a helicopter "pro-life"?
Posted by: aguy109 | Nov 13, 2008 3:10:45 AM
Somehow, Paglia has morphed into Hitchens. Maybe she will get that waxing thing done now...
Posted by: missvolare | Nov 13, 2008 4:47:17 AM
Paglia has a ghost writer? This can't have come from her keyboard, right, Camille?
Posted by: mr.ed | Nov 13, 2008 5:10:05 AM
...waxing thing
lol. "below the waist, a waste." Above the neck, a wreck?
But Hitchens despises her with as much articulate splendor as he can muster, which is plenty.
But since she's pro-life, she's my girl...
Sigh.
Posted by: Carlos | Nov 13, 2008 6:16:32 AM
Camille Paglia is a vampire. And as far as contrarianists go, she's rather facile. I'd respect her more if she wasn't so lazy and chose less popular victims to eat, even though I understand the need to steal other people's souls to rejuvenate you own can lead you to take short cuts. Come on, Camille, tell me why Andrea Yates is a model for 21rst matriarchal attitudes, or why Susan Atkins should be as iconic as Che Guevara. What's so funny about Paglia is that her insistence on glomming onto topical pop personalities only makes her more irrelevant, not less.
Posted by: Chris | Nov 13, 2008 1:04:13 PM
Paglia is a pompous, self-important fraud whose only true topic is herself. Insofar as she passes herself off as an academic, she gives scholarship a bad name and a bad taste. Please ignore her in the future as it is bad enough that Salon still gives her space.
Posted by: David Jensen | Nov 13, 2008 2:12:11 PM
I wholeheartedly agree.
Feminists have lost a lot of credibility among women, who watched in horror as the organization that purportedly supports women launched a barrage of vicious attacks on Governor Palin, a WOMAN whose life and career are the very model of feminism.
BTW: Her husband should have been lauded as the model supportive spouse!
From this day forward N.O.W. should own up to the more fitting, N.L.O.W. National Liberal Organization of Women
Posted by: Marie Oser | Nov 13, 2008 4:52:28 PM
Obligatory "Godwin's Law" post:
I suppose Paglia would have found Hitler's ascent to power a validation of aspiring painters everywhere...
Posted by: sxl | Nov 13, 2008 7:20:58 PM
There is also some entertaining takedownage over at Berube's place.
Posted by: Michael Drake | Nov 14, 2008 11:47:39 AM
Camille also sez (Feb 14, 2007):
"Don't count Mitt Romney out. Not yet nationally known, Romney harks back to the patrician days of sophisticated Republicanism. In 1994, on my book tour for 'Vamps & Tramps,' I was sitting late one night in the empty lobby of WBZ-AM NewsRadio, located on a lonely road in Boston. While waiting to go on the David Brudnoy Show (Brudnoy, living with AIDS, would die a decade later), I listened intently to the guest on air before me -- Mitt Romney, whom I had never heard of but who was then mounting his unsuccessful senatorial challenge to Ted Kennedy.
I was very impressed. When Romney emerged, I shook his hand and said, 'You're going to be president!' -- something I have never said to anyone, before or since. He flushed with pleasure and embarrassed surprise -- as if I had uncovered a secret. Afterward I followed Romney's career from a distance -- his return to private business, his directorship of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games, and then his surprise election as governor of Massachusetts in 2003. Stay tuned."
Posted by: Steven Augustine | Nov 14, 2008 3:06:50 PM
Give it up, Camille. No matter how nice you speak of Sarah, she won't ever let you eat her pussy out.
Posted by: Harmonika Savingsbonds | Nov 14, 2008 4:02:36 PM
Post a comment