| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The Met’s take on John Adams’s “Doctor Atomic.” | Main | Sunday Poem »

October 25, 2008

Sean Carroll on Hyperion

Hyperion2_cassini300x273 Over at Cosmic Variance, Sean Carroll has a couple of interesting posts on the seeming collapse of the wave function and Saturn's moon Hyperion:

One of the annoying/fascinating things about quantum mechanics is the fact the world doesn’t seem to be quantum-mechanical. When you look at something, it seems to have a location, not a superposition of all possible locations; when it travels from one place to another, it seems to take a path, not a sum over all paths. This frustration was expressed by no lesser a person than Albert Einstein, quoted by Abraham Pais, quoted in turn by David Mermin in a lovely article entitled “Is the Moon There when Nobody Looks?“:

I recall that during one walk Einstein suddenly stopped, turned to me and asked whether I really believed that the moon exists only when I looked at it.

The conventional quantum-mechanical answer would be “Sure, the moon exists when you’re not looking at it. But there is no such thing as `the position of the moon’ when you are not looking at it.”

Nevertheless, astronomers over the centuries have done a pretty good job predicting eclipses as if there really was something called `the position of the moon,’ even when nobody (as far as we know) was looking at it. There is a conventional quantum-mechanical explanation for this, as well: the correspondence principle, which states that the predictions of quantum mechanics in the limit of a very large number of particles (a macroscopic body) approach those of classical Newtonian mechanics. This is one of those vague but invaluable rules of thumb that was formulated by Niels Bohr back in the salad days of quantum mechanics. If it sounds a little hand-wavy, that’s because it is.

The vagueness of the correspondence principle prods a careful physicist into formulating a more precise version, or perhaps coming up with counterexamples. And indeed, counterexamples exist: namely, when the classical predictions for the system in question are chaotic. In chaotic systems, tiny differences in initial conditions grow into substantial differences in the ultimate evolution. It shouldn’t come as any surprise, then, that it is hard to map the predictions for classically chaotic systems onto average values of predictions for quantum observables. Essentially, tiny quantum uncertainties in the state of a chaotic system grow into large quantum uncertainties before too long, and the system is no longer accurately described by a classical limit, even if there are large numbers of particles.

Some years ago, Wojciech Zurek and Juan Pablo Paz described a particularly interesting real-world example of such a system:  Hyperion, a moon of Saturn that features an irregular shape and a spongy surface texture.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 05:20 PM | Permalink

Comments

What an extraordinary image. Hyperion looks like an enormous piece of pumice.

Posted by: Carlos | Oct 25, 2008 6:31:36 PM

From the above article:

I guess I'm not religious. Am I alone in noticing that quantum mechanics seems to have degenerated into a contest, the goal of which is to mathematically prove the most ridiculous statement?
I suppose it keeps folks out of trouble.

Posted by: Bob | Oct 25, 2008 10:19:42 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Martine on Friday Poem

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

aguy109 on Vocal Minority Insists It Was All Smoke and Mirrors

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J.Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J.Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

mary on Happy Bastille Day

Dr.R.P.Sehgal on India, China and the polemics of the East

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Pakistan's galleries on the go

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Ruchira on Pakistan's galleries on the go

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

A on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

John Ballard on Happy Bastille Day

giotto on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

David Schneider on the consititution as work of art

fred lapides on unsticking the conservative brain

J. Hawkins on Happy Bastille Day


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed