| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« 'Glowing' jellyfish grabs Nobel | Main | Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here? »

October 09, 2008

Never Say Die: Why We Can't Imagine Death

From Scientific American:

Everybody’s wonderin’ what and where they all came from.
Everybody’s worryin’ ’bout where they’re gonna go when the whole thing’s done.
But no one knows for certain and so it’s all the same to me.
I think I’ll just let the mystery be.

Death It should strike us as odd that we feel inclined to nod our heads in agreement to the twangy, sweetly discordant folk vocals of Iris Dement in “Let the Mystery Be,” a humble paean about the hereafter. In fact, the only real mystery is why we’re so convinced that when it comes to where we’re going “when the whole thing’s done,” we’re dealing with a mystery at all. After all, the brain is like any other organ: a part of our physical body. And the mind is what the brain does—it’s more a verb than it is a noun. Why do we wonder where our mind goes when the body is dead? Shouldn’t it be obvious that the mind is dead, too? And yet people in every culture believe in an afterlife of some kind or, at the very least, are unsure about what happens to the mind at death. My psychological research has led me to believe that these irrational beliefs, rather than resulting from religion or serving to protect us from the terror of inexistence, are an inevitable by-product of self-consciousness. Because we have never experienced a lack of consciousness, we cannot imagine what it will feel like to be dead. In fact, it won’t feel like anything—and therein lies the problem.

The common view of death as a great mystery usually is brushed aside as an emotionally fueled desire to believe that death isn’t the end of the road. And indeed, a prominent school of research in social psychology called terror management theory contends that afterlife beliefs, as well as less obvious beliefs, behaviors and attitudes, exist to assuage what would otherwise be crippling anxiety about the ego’s inexistence. According to proponents, you possess a secret arsenal of psychological defenses designed to keep your death anxiety at bay (and to keep you from ending up in the fetal position listening to Nick Drake on your iPod). My writing this article, for example, would be interpreted as an exercise in “symbolic immortality”; terror management theorists would likely tell you that I wrote it for posterity, to enable a concrete set of my ephemeral ideas to outlive me, the biological organism. (I would tell you that I’d be happy enough if a year from now it still had a faint pulse.)

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 06:43 AM | Permalink

Comments

John Stuart Mill pretty much sums up my attitude to death:

"The mere cessation of existence is no evil to any one: the idea is only formidable through the illusion of imagination which makes one conceive oneself as if one were alive and feeling oneself dead. What is odious in death is not death itself, but the act of dying, and its lugubrious accompaniments: all of which must be equally undergone by the believer in immortality".

Posted by: Jared | Oct 9, 2008 9:53:02 AM

The author writes: "Wait, you say, isn’t Unamuno forgetting something? We certainly do have experience with nothingness. Every night, in fact, when we’re in dreamless sleep. But you’d be mistaken in this assumption. Clark puts it this way (emphasis mine): “We may occasionally have the impression of having experienced or ‘undergone’ a period of unconsciousness, but, of course, this is impossible. The ‘nothingness’ of unconsciousness cannot be an experienced actuality.”

Of course we do not experience deep sleep during deep sleep, but we do know, on waking, that we have experienced a period of unconciousness. Similarly, we all know that there was a very long period before our birth in which we did not exist. This is the best model for what the experience of death will be like - simply a return to the no-experience prior to birth. What's so hard to understand?

Posted by: Jared | Oct 9, 2008 10:44:10 AM

The problem, very simply, is that we don't want to die -- most of us, at least.

Yes, we are not conscious in deep sleep, but we have gone to sleep many times and woken from it, so that doesn't bother us.

We know (or fear) that we will not wake from death. And the self (to Buddhists, an illusory "self") doesn't want to not-exist -- it very badly doesn't want to not-exist.

My challenge to those who claim they aren't bothered by the thought of their dying is: if I were to put a loaded gun to your head (something I would never do in reality, of course), and you were convinced I was about to pull the trigger, would you be completely OK with that?

Posted by: JonJ | Oct 9, 2008 11:02:45 AM

JonJ,

"And the self (to Buddhists, an illusory "self") doesn't want to not-exist -- it very badly doesn't want to not-exist"

Of course you are right about this. We fear death emotionally and resent the fact of non-existence, which we know intellectually is our fate. So there is this huge conflict in our brain between the emotional not wanting to die and the intellectual awareness that we will die. Most resolve this conflict in favour of the emotional, and the emotional fear of death becomes the basis of religion which is simply a constructed fantasy, or lie. A minority can accept that non-existence after death is a fact and we can take comfort in the fact that non-existence is by definition not painful. After all, none of us suffered before we were born, did we?

Posted by: Jared | Oct 9, 2008 11:14:29 AM

I'll reiterate what I've said before about this same article. If the author ever bothered to study Iris Dement's body of work, he'd realize the pointlessness of his own argument.

Posted by: MG | Oct 10, 2008 7:34:33 PM

I was waiting for a train this week and a stranger came up to me and asked 'excuse me, do you know what happens after we die'. I just thought 'wierdo' and walked away - why would any man pick out a lone woman on a platform to ask such a question?

And anyway, why would I know what happens after we die? I haven't died yet! Although I agree completely with Jared - I've always thought death would be just the same as it was before I was born.

And if anyone has ever fainted I'm sure that is what dying feels like as you feel your conciousness slip away. When you return you have no sense of the time you were away for.

Posted by: keri | Oct 12, 2008 7:51:47 AM

Thanks, Keri,

It seems to me that life is just a very brief instant separating two very long periods of non-existence - before birth and after death. I'm not religious. I think life on this planet is simply a side-effect of the workings of physical laws that have created the universe since the Big Bang. The universe has existence but no meaning. As to what precipitated the Big Bang - that remains a mystery. To be afraid of death is absurd given that none of us were in existence for billions of years prior to being born, and we will simply return to the state of non-existence that we came from.

Posted by: Jared | Oct 12, 2008 10:05:37 AM

"If I was dead, I wouldn’t know I was dead. That’s the only thing I have against death. I want to enjoy my death. That’s where liberty lies: to see oneself dead".

–Eleuthéria
Samuel Beckett

Posted by: Jared | Oct 21, 2008 12:41:43 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    Pete Chapman on Sunday Poem

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Jeff Strabone on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Victoria Nwobodo on Facebook Poetry – Oxymoron or Hamburger-Chain Art?

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Joe Y on Summer time and the eating is easy

    hmmm on Losing the Plot (The Hotel)

    Cyrus Hall on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Louise Gordon on In God's name

    Manisha Verma on India, China and the polemics of the East

    sw on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    J. Hawkins on In God's name

    kerg on The Israeli thought-police is here

    J. Hawkins on The Israeli thought-police is here

    IJ on The Israeli thought-police is here

    andy on Summer time and the eating is easy

    DRK on In God's name

    Elatia Harris on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Tasnim on Perceptions

    Frances Madeson on 'What's exciting is that writing has become a weapon'

    Anonymous on India, China and the polemics of the East

    Cyrus Hall on The Israeli thought-police is here

    hidflect on Perceptions

    aditya dev sood on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Azra Raza on Perceptions

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed