September 19, 2008
The Pale Cast of Thought
The toxic yet vacuous phrase “self-indulgent” was often used by the detractors of David Foster Wallace (as if it isn’t self-indulgent to write anything at all). Another accusation, that Wallace was overly cerebral, misses the point completely. As a writer, the guy was as large-hearted as he was big-brained. Don Gately, the recovering narcotics addict in Infinite Jest, is one of the most compassionately drawn and convincingly real characters in contemporary fiction, close in intention, conception, and articulation to a latter-day Leopold Bloom.I don’t think an essay more hilarious than “A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again” — Wallace’s account of a botched vacation on a cruise ship — has been written. It ranks with Twain and will endure as long as people want to laugh. His essays often brought forth a sense of exuberant joy, with their meanderings and addictive, often imitated footnotes and mock-scholarly sensibility. Yet Wallace’s fiction also portrays terrible mental darkness, especially what doctors call “major depression.” Wallace’s father told The New York Times that his son suffered from this disease for years, leading to two recent hospitalizations before his apparent suicide.
more from The Smart Set here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 12:53 PM | Permalink






Comments
I am going to miss DFW's presence in this world very much. What makes me sad even more than his death was the psychic pain he was in beforehand.
May he become a Buddha.
Posted by: anechoic | Sep 20, 2008 1:05:00 PM
i never heard of the guy until i read aboout his death here. i then watched few min in the 1997 interview he had with and now see the photo atached. My question: what's the story with this idiotic thing he was rapping around his head? what's the purpose of it? what does it supose to convey? i find it annoying and idiotic that only those caring for attention and celebritaism would put on the heads. i obviously hope he will rest in peace.
Posted by: a question | Sep 21, 2008 12:45:00 PM
I read he wore that because of Federer, a tennis player whom he admired. I also hope he is in a "better place" now. I read that he had taken antidepressants for 20 years and had had electroshock "treatment" last summer. I think that might be enough to make anyone want to cash in their chips. Ken Kesey comes to mind.
It's a very sad note that such a brilliant, humane guy found living in this society too much to bear.
Posted by: CriticalMassI | Sep 21, 2008 1:07:27 PM
"...i find it annoying and idiotic that only those caring for attention and celebritaism would put on the heads."
Shakespeare sports that canonical ruff; Joyce had his iconic eye patch; Bellow his trademark fedora; Burroughs his ever-present trilby; Murdoch her distinctive bowl cut; Sontag her distinguished streak; Burgess his patented combover; the mendicant gurn of Borges; Fitzgerald and his auctorial flute; Vonnegut and that exquiste hacking cough; Pound his signifying goatee; Boyle his genre-defining vandyke; Hammett his hardboiled mustache; Auster his cinematic Schimmelpenninck; Sartre his essential pipe; Hemingway his allusive hunting rifle; Faulkner his walking stick; Irving his wrestling tights; Stein her Toklas; Wolfe his ice cream suit; Kerouac his army surplus jacket; Capote his lisp, Miller his leer and Nabokov his sneer, et al. I think we can allow DFW his bandana.
Posted by: Steven Augustine | Sep 22, 2008 5:53:15 AM
in d. eggers introduction to infinite jest he credits the bandanna with dfw's terrible case of heavy perspiration. especially while engaging the public or an audience. he does not wear it in his dust jacket photo.
sartre and his eye.
Posted by: Jeb | Sep 22, 2008 10:46:14 AM
Post a comment