| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« A goat for the goddess | Main | The prescient politics of The Big Lebowski »

September 11, 2008

Results of a National Online Dialogue

Results from an experiment by the Center for Deliberative Democracy, for this election season:

A national experiment in public online deliberation, sponsored by By the People in partnership with the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation as part of the Dialogues in Democracy project, reveals what citizens would think about their role in a democracy-if only they became more informed about the issues and talked about them together. Over 1,300 citizens from around the country participated in this experiment over four weeks in fall 2007. A nationally representative sample was recruited and randomly assigned to deliberate about the issues (301 participants) or to simply answer survey questions before and after (1,000 person control group). The results show that once people talk about the issues and become more informed about them, they change their views in significant, and sometimes surprising, ways.

"We put all of America in a virtual room to consider the future of citizenship," said James Fishkin, Director of the Center for Deliberative Democracy at Stanford University, which conducted the poll in conjunction with YouGov America. "The results are thoughtful and balanced and deserve to be considered by policymakers everywhere." Sample results will be featured on the By the People national broadcast, airing in January on PBS.

The discussions focused on four aspects of the role of citizens in a democracy: political participation, exercising choice, becoming informed and public service. The discussions focused on four aspects of the role of citizens in a democracy: political participation, exercising choice, becoming informed and public service. In each case there were statistically significant changes of opinion and gains in information. The sample learned a lot and changed its views. In fact, 39 out of 56 policy questions (66%) changed significantly among the deliberators from the beginning to the end of the process.

 

Posted by Robin Varghese at 06:23 PM | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    Pete Chapman on Sunday Poem

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Jeff Strabone on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Victoria Nwobodo on Facebook Poetry – Oxymoron or Hamburger-Chain Art?

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Joe Y on Summer time and the eating is easy

    hmmm on Losing the Plot (The Hotel)

    Cyrus Hall on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Louise Gordon on In God's name

    Manisha Verma on India, China and the polemics of the East

    sw on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    J. Hawkins on In God's name

    kerg on The Israeli thought-police is here

    J. Hawkins on The Israeli thought-police is here

    IJ on The Israeli thought-police is here

    andy on Summer time and the eating is easy

    DRK on In God's name

    Elatia Harris on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Tasnim on Perceptions

    Frances Madeson on 'What's exciting is that writing has become a weapon'

    Anonymous on India, China and the polemics of the East

    Cyrus Hall on The Israeli thought-police is here

    hidflect on Perceptions

    aditya dev sood on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Azra Raza on Perceptions

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed