| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« What the Obama Candidacy Means for Scholars of Race | Main | Poets and the People: Reflections on solidarity during wartime »

September 07, 2008

Buffered and porous selves

Charles Taylor in The Immanent Frame:

Almost everyone can agree that one of the big differences between us and our ancestors of five hundred years ago is that they lived in an “enchanted” world, and we do not; at the very least, we live in a much less “enchanted” world. We might think of this as our having “lost” a number of beliefs and the practices which they made possible. But more, the enchanted world was one in which these forces could cross a porous boundary and shape our lives, psychic and physical. One of the big differences between us and them is that we live with a much firmer sense of the boundary between self and other. We are “buffered” selves. We have changed.

This is not a mere “subtraction” story, for it thinks not only of loss but of remaking. With the subtraction story, there can be no epistemic loss involved in the transition; we have just shucked off some false beliefs, some fears of imagined objects. Looked at my way, the process of disenchantment involves a change in sensibility; one is open to different things. One has lost a way in which people used to experience the world.

Disenchantment in my use (and partly in Weber’s) really translates Weber’s term “Entzauberung,” where the key kernel concept is “Zauber,” magic. In a sense, moderns constructed their own concept of magic from and through the process of disenchantment. Carried out first under Reforming Christian auspices, the condemned practices all involved using spiritual force against or at least independently of our relation to God. The worst examples were things like saying a black mass for the dead to kill off your enemy or using the host as a love charm. But in the more exigent modes of Reform, the distinction between white and black magic tended to disappear, and all independent recourse to forces independent of God was seen as culpable. The category “magic” was constituted through this rejection, and this distinction was then handed on to post-Enlightenment anthropology, as with Frazer’s distinction between “magic” and “religion.”

The process of disenchantment, involving a change in us, can be seen as a loss of a certain sensibility that is really an impoverishment (as against simply the shedding of irrational feelings).

Posted by Robin Varghese at 06:32 PM | Permalink

Comments

Thank sweet non-existent Christ for Charles Taylor. Watching him write on religion in today's intellectual climate is like watching Usain Bolt line up in the 100m against a kindergarten class.

He is a genealogist of the highest order.

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Sep 7, 2008 11:56:42 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Politics Prize


Donate to Todd Shea

More info about Todd Shea and his work here on 3QD.

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Facebook


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Dredd on buruma on the swiss

Randolyn Zinn on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Lambness on the fugitive spirit of Zomia

Andrea on FASTER, TERPSICHORE, FASTER! On Frederick Wiseman’s new documentary La Danse: The Paris Opera Ballet (Zipporah Films)

Lambness on Why Your Older Brother Didn't Share

Namit on Early Islam, Part 2: The Golden Age

Picador on What Is 'Non-Western' Philosophy?

fourcultures on Critical thinking may lead to misogyny!

fourcultures on What Is 'Non-Western' Philosophy?

Barbara on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Harriet on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Cyrus Hall on Critical thinking may lead to misogyny!

Sue Hubbard on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Chris Schoen on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

billy on Critical thinking may lead to misogyny!

John Ballard on The health-care bill has no master plan for curbing costs. Is that a bad thing?

Daniel Rourke on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Muhammad Saadullah Munir on Early Islam, Part 2: The Golden Age

sufi on An excellent charitable cause for this season of giving!

sufi on An excellent charitable cause for this season of giving!

OT on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Larry Poss on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

holly alderman on Brian D'Amato: Mayan Sci-Fi and the Tribe of True -- Not Aspirant -- Nerds

Namit on Critical thinking may lead to misogyny!

billy on Critical thinking may lead to misogyny!


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes


Logos designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed