August 11, 2008
Voices from the most dangerous nation on earth
by Adrienne Hyat
Since my recent return from a lengthy stay in Pakistan, I've been asked numerous times about my safety while I was there. My standard reply is something like, "It was a tumultuous year--and I could have done without all the headlines--even encountered a few anxious moments--but for the most part I felt pretty safe and welcome." But that reply often is met with puzzled and doubtful looks. It's difficult to convince people that there is another side to the place that has been called, "the most dangerous nation on earth."
To those with first hand knowledge, the reality on the ground is in sharp contrast to the image the media presents:
Father Daniel Suply, 75, is a missionary priest with the Roman Catholic order of Belgian Capuchans. He has resided in Pakistan for nearly 45 years. When asked about his safety, Father Suply spontaneously replies, “I feel absolutely safe.”
He teaches in a seminary and performs religious services in a parish. Except for one brief incident in the early 1990’s which was quickly snuffed out thanks to Father Suply’s fluency in Punjabi, he has never felt threatened here.
Nevertheless, he finds it difficult to convince people back in Belgium to the contrary—until, that is, they come and see for themselves,
“Over the years quite a few people have come to visit us from Europe.” He says. “Of late, many of these people are often advised not to travel to Pakistan because it’s[considered to be] such a dangerous place. When they do come here, they say, ‘…no, no, no it is totally safe. We are totally safe…That was a very negative picture we got from the people.’ A very negative picture… which is not just, actually. Not correct. Not the reality. Of course, Waziristan, that is a dangerous place. I would never venture to go there. The Taliban are there.”
Father Suply is quick to point out that Pakistan is facing some deeply critical issues which could lead to the destabilization of the country. However, he does not dwell on those issues. Instead, he focuses on his “very meaningful ministry” in which he finds great reward and which, he adds, “is very much appreciated” by his students.
Alan Cheshire, 52, is a former United Nations Field Officer. He is currently working on a bio-fuel project in Pakistan. Cheshire has done stints in Bosnia, Albania and Kosovo. He finds Pakistan much safer than any of the other places he’s been.
“In those places,” Cheshire says, “I could not go out without an armed guard. But here in Pakistan, I go into the villages on my own.”
He, too, finds it difficult to convince people back home to the contrary, “They think Pakistan is full of terrorists,” Cheshire says, shaking his head. “ …they’re actually lovely people. The only problem I’ve got is too much tea. They’re always offering me tea.”
Cheshire has felt threatened here, once, on the night of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. He and two Norwegian friends were in a restaurant in the inner city of Lahore when they heard the news. Riots broke out, shops closed and they rushed to get home. On their way, some local shopkeepers lifted up the shutters of their shops and invited them in. “These people were prepared to risk their lives for Europeans. Now that”, says Cheshire emotionally, “is friendliness.”
Laura and Dale Sinkler are from Kalkaska, Michigan. They have lived in Pakistan with their children for several years. Their first stint was from 1996-2001 in a remote area in the outskirts of Multan where they worked on construction of two power plants. In 2001, they left Pakistan to work on power projects in Bangladesh. In 2006, Dale returned to Pakistan this time working for his own power generation firm. Laura and two of their children, a third is in the US Army, joined him in Lahore in 2007.
They speak fondly about Pakistan and the people they’ve met here. They say that coming back to Pakistan the second time around, “felt like coming home.” What has impressed them the most has been the generosity and hospitality of the poor villagers whom they befriended while working in the outskirts of Multan.
“We would go to their homes and have lunch or dinner with them.” Dale Sinkler says. “Oftentimes, we’d feel very uncomfortable because they would be serving us food that we knew they couldn’t afford to serve us. We’d go there and sit on a charpoy [a wooden framed straw bed] and they’d treat us like royalty out of a tin cup.” Even now, years later, when the Sinklers go back to visit their friends in the villages they are treated “like royalty”.
As for their security, the Sinklers say they have felt safe and comfortable during their time in Pakistan despite the risks, which they don’t necessarily consider to be any greater than the risks that exist in other places. And, as experience has shown, some things they perceived as threats actually turned out to be friendly encounters.
Laura Sinkler amusingly recalls a nervous encounter she once had while horseback riding in a village with some female friends “… my horse got away from me, I couldn’t stop it, so I pulled it’s head back to get it to stop and it ended up turning and I actually ended up in a little yard of one of the mosques. I was afraid I was going to be in trouble because you know, that’s their holy ground, so I hurried up and got it out of there but instead of getting in trouble they invited me in for tea.”
The Sinklers have found that the secret to their success here has been tolerance. “If you treat them with respect” says Dale, “ultimately they will return that two-fold.”
Gillian Thornton, 48, is a school teacher from England. She came to Pakistan in 2006 to work for a year as a volunteer teacher trainer in the government schools in Lahore. Thornton explains her reason for coming to Pakistan, “I found the idea of working in a Muslim culture very interesting…from the perspective of a single woman, I wondered if I could fit in and how.” Thornton admits, however, she was apprehensive about the decision of whether to come to Pakistan in light of media coverage about the country.
Two years, and a second contract later, Thornton believes she does, indeed, fit in here, thanks to her willingness to respect the culture. Her experience has been so positive she now has plans to stay on for a third year. She says the best thing about her time here has been the way she’s been received by the Pakistani people and the friendships she has made with them.
As for the apprehensions she had before coming here, she says, “The reality of living and working here has been very different than the media coverage. I’ve never been threatened, I feel very comfortable here…I’m living proof that Pakistan is not the place the media has portrayed it to be.”
Thornton credits her experience in Pakistan for broadening her horizons and understanding of the world. She and some of her fellow former volunteers, who originally came to Pakistan through the UK-based Voluntary Services Overseas (VSO), have joked about VSO’s motto, ‘Sharing skills, Changing lives.’ “It was, undoubtedly, the lives of the volunteers,” says Thornton emphatically, ”that changed the most!”
To be certain, there are parts of Pakistan that are very dangerous and especially hostile to foreigners—parts of the Northwest Frontier Province and Balochistan, as well as the Federally Administered Tribal Areas or FATA, which is reportedly the current home of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. And even the major cities throughout the country have had their share of violence. Earlier this year, Lahore, which was historically peaceful and quiet, experienced several suicide bombings. And attacks specifically targeting foreigners have also occurred throughout the country.
But to consider these events as an accurate reflection of the whole picture is a gross misperception. Just as it is wrong to assume that the extremist views held by a few represent the many. And the irony in adapting these views is that it tends to fuel anti-Western resentment. As Dale Sinkler put it, “If you treat people like that is what they’re made of than that’s exactly what you’re going to get in return.”
Ms. Hyat is an attorney who has lived and taught law in Pakistan.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:30 AM | Permalink










Comments
Well, comments from extremely well traveled women mountain climbers say Pakistan is the worst place on earth for harassment and attitudes toward women.
Read Savage Summit by Jordan to get a good perspective of western women and Pakistan.
Until Pakistan can move on from being ruled by bronze and iron age myths, and fear of the power of the female, it will wallow in the ignorance of it's current state.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Aug 11, 2008 10:41:18 AM
gee great Dave, lets check with the women mountaineers to get an idea...since the mountains are smack dab in the middle of the country and not in an isolated region - they surely are representative of the majority...
Posted by: Faraz | Aug 11, 2008 1:59:15 PM
I too have recently (post 9 11) spent some time traveling, with my husband, through Pakistan. I can't wait to go back. It was one of the most fascinating,interesting, eyeopening trips I have ever taken. My favorite place there was Lahore (sorry Abbas) for its sheer beauty and palpable history. I was amazed (and shamed) by the hospitality of the many Pakistanis I have met and I think anyone with a bit of common sense and understanding of the local culture and costumes will find it a place worthwhile visiting.
Posted by: Margit | Aug 11, 2008 3:43:03 PM
To be fair, many comrades have had a great time in Pakistan, and compared to, say Bogota Columbia, is not even in the same category as far as danger is concerned.
I would love to experience the Karakoram, and Pakistan is a place I would love to visit.
That said, women do feel harassed in Pakistan, from the many women friends who have traveled there.
Women mountain climbers are constantly dealing with bureaucracy, and the sexist attitudes and outright sexual advances and assumptions are overt, and, from these women who have dealt with cultures world wide, considered the most daunting and despicable the have to deal with.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Aug 11, 2008 6:29:35 PM
I live in Colombia.
Same thing.
I feel perfectly safe in Colombia.
Once in a park a young man hassled me and yelled obscenities because I didn't want to buy incense from him. It took me by surprise.
But within minutes, three strangers came up to me and apologized for his behavior. What great people!
RR
Posted by: Ron Ringsrud | Aug 11, 2008 8:22:26 PM
Ron-
I have spent quite a bit of time in Colombia, and find Bogota a exciting, cosmopolitan city, much more than the US.
I have never had a any trouble.
However, a friends father was kidnapped and killed. Colombia has one of the highest murder rates on earth.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Aug 11, 2008 8:42:24 PM
Dave,
Attitudes good or bad are not country specific. They can alter between place to place within a country. I have been flipped by some farm boys while driving through North Dakota, while on the same trip I had a cop help me out when I ran out of gas on the highway. It depends on where you are and who you run into.
Posted by: Nasir Khan | Aug 12, 2008 10:44:04 AM
Nasir-
Very true. I think 90% of people everywhere are essentially good (and I have traveled in war zones).
It is the sociopaths and psychopaths who seem to rise to the top of the stew that cause the problems.
That is why, as Abbey pointed out, the stew must be stirred on a regular basis, or the scum rises to the top.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Aug 12, 2008 10:52:59 AM
I can see where solitary foreigners in Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces appreciate the friendship and hospitality of the locals.But put this in perspective Pakistan has four states two of which are off limits and the FATA is most definitely a no-go zone.I'm sorry but the most dangerous country label is not entirely off the mark.
Posted by: sumant | Aug 13, 2008 5:16:49 PM
Clearly the large metropolises and even many of the small villages are hospitable to foreigners or at least to Westerners. However, the zone of problems is a little bit larger than just the FATAs and most of the Northwest Frontier Province. There's Baluchistan, where there is a full-fledged civil war going on. There are suicide bombings in some cities (which to its credit the article mentions). That's like half the country by area, though not by population and interest, I grant you.
I understand how much it must annoy people in Pakistan to be constantly considered to be a terrorist/failed state, etc, etc. That's definitely an exaggeration. On the other hand, terrorism and acts of violence and lawlessness have been increasing in Pakistan over the past few years. Here's hoping Musharraf gets impeached, kicked out, and a democratic government does a better job improving the situation. They could hardly do worse than the military has done.
Posted by: Hektor Bim | Aug 14, 2008 9:00:47 AM
I also don't think you can blow off attitudes toward women in Pakistan. That's a real problem which continues to hold back South Asians in general.
Posted by: Hektor Bim | Aug 14, 2008 9:01:55 AM
Adrienne Hyat's incisive first hand account of her experiences is contrary to conventional wisdom and conventional wisdom happens to be Newsweek, a publication that conferred the title of Most Dangerous Country on Pakistan earlier this year.
BBC reporter Hugh Sykes also disagrees:
"A few days ago I was sitting in a cafe sipping best Italian espresso and reading a news magazine. The front page was full of furious faces and clenched fists under the headline, The Most Dangerous Nation in the World isn't Iraq, it's Pakistan...There is no way I would do there what I have just done in Pakistan: take a holiday."
Amateur mathematician Hector Bim claims that half of Pakistan is dangerous. He is wrong. By most estimates, however, half of India's 28 states are rocked by organized warfare. PV Ramana analysis finds Maoist rebels are active in 17 states. And that does not account for the Kashmir insurgency, the separatist violence in states that include Orissa, the recent spate of bombs in urban centers, or the usual: caste warfare and violence against Christians, Muslims and women.
Pakistan, in comparison, is doing just fine. Somebody needs to run the numbers again.
Pankaj Mishra, who also disagrees with Newsweek, sums it up best:
"In his new book, The Post-American World, [Zakaria] describes India as a 'powerful package' and claims it has been 'peaceful, stable, and prosperous' since 1997 - a decade in which India and Pakistan came close to nuclear war, tens of thousands of Indian farmers took their own lives, Maoist insurgencies erupted across large parts of the country, and Hindu nationalists in Gujarat murdered more than 2,000 Muslims."
Go figure.
Posted by: Ghalib | Aug 16, 2008 8:16:41 PM
@ Dave: I beg your pardon. I would prefer to follow the so called "bronze age myths" that you refer to rather than following your rational dogmas. If you dont like Islam, dont accept it. But you have no right to stop people from practicing it or from accepting it. Seems you are a fortune teller! Fortune tellers used to make big bucks back in the bronze and iron ages. Prophecies were sought. Seems that you want to move on but you are stuck somewhere back in time. Correct yourself before you embark on giving out future predictions.
Posted by: salafi | Aug 18, 2008 3:48:30 AM
That is my uncle Dale and my Aunt loria
Posted by: Kristi Sinkler | May 29, 2009 1:40:28 PM
Post a comment