| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Between Church and State | Main | Moral Blame and Memory »

May 23, 2008

Reconsidering the One Dollar a Day Poverty Line

In the Economist:

The dollar-a-day definition of global destitution made its debut in the bank's 1990 World Development Report. It was largely the discovery of Martin Ravallion, a researcher at the bank, and two co-authors, who noticed that the national poverty lines of half-a-dozen developing countries clustered around that amount. In two working papers* published this week, Mr Ravallion and two colleagues, Shaohua Chen and Prem Sangraula, revisit the dollar-a-day line in light of the bank's new estimates of purchasing power. They also provide a new count of China's poor.

Thanks to American inflation, $1.08 in 1993 was worth about $1.45 in 2005 money. In principle, the researchers could count the number of people living on less than this amount, converted into local money using the bank's new PPP rates. But $1.45 a day strikes the authors as a bit high. Rather than update their poverty line, they propose to abandon it. It is time, they say, to return to first principles, repeating the exercise Mr Ravallion performed almost two decades ago, using the better, more abundant data available now.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:22 PM | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Ken Pidcock on Vague Scientist

Elatia Harris on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Slocum on The Tipping Point Theory of Racial Segregation: Fascinating but Mythological?

maniza on Why the Left is wrong on Iran

Louise Gordon on Vague Scientist

eli on Vague Scientist

Elatia Harris on Vague Scientist

Abbas Raza on Why the Left is wrong on Iran

Pete Chapman on Vague Scientist

fred lapides on What's the baby sitter up to?

Mike Cope on Thursday Poem

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Christopher on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Winfield J. Abbe on Walter Isaacson on Einstein

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed