| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS | MONDAY COLUMNS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Philip Glass's Call to Arms | Main | Psychological Sources of the Self »

May 11, 2008

god art

Martin_2

‘If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent him,’ Voltaire stated. This premise, as expressed in what is possibly one of the most famous lines in the history of philosophy, perfectly summarizes the paradoxical relationship Western societies have had to the idea of faith or belief in the existence of a divine being since the days of the Enlightenment. While most of us seem to believe that there is no such thing as God, and have by and large accepted the rather bleak fact that there is ultimately no meaning to our existence, many of us are (secretly) still searching for a higher power to provide an explanation for the mystery, marvel and misery of the world around us. This desire to conceive of a force capable of providing some guidance and direction for the life we live remains firmly engrained no matter how little belief in God persists.

In the sphere of visual art, Belgian artist Kris Martin provides one of the most striking explorations of this dilemma of faith. Martin is a believer, it would seem, and his work clearly challenges the generally accepted assessment of our life as stripped of meaning, without any enduring substance. Most of his practice circles (in one way or another) around the subjects of life and death, and the ephemerality and fragility of our existence. While it seems that a large number of contemporary artists tackle issues of such significance, it is in fact rather unusual to come across one whose work and artistic motifs are so clearly related to considering these fundamental questions, and whose own position is firmly rooted in a belief in Christian values and the existence of God.

more from Frieze here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 11:58 AM | Permalink

Comments

Martin seems to have achieved a light touch on the themes of non-existence, impersonality, irrational authority, the puniness of human effort, and inscurtability of God, if there is one. I especially like the reveiwer's comments on Martin's Laacoon, the classic Greek sculpture minus the serpents.
However, this does not seem to evince Christian belief as much as a Zen-like delight in non-meaning.

Posted by: plato's cave | May 11, 2008 12:12:50 PM

The reviewer makes this comment:

"While most of us seem to believe that there is no such thing as God, and have by and large accepted the rather bleak fact that there is ultimately no meaning to our existence . . ."

and I cannot fathom who the "most of us" could refer to in anything other than a solipsistic universe. For good or ill, right or wrong, paradise or damnation, MOST Americans state that they believe in a supreme deity. Some of us may inhabit pockets of other beliefs (Discordianism, The Church of the Sub-Genius) but "some of us" are not "most of us" and are happy NOT to be "most of us." You know what I mean?

But, really, beyond this, what is the basis of the reviewer's having "beliefs" about my (or anyone else's) beliefs? Is that any less intellectually specious than someone's believing in, say, a strictly defined Old Testament god?

Posted by: Samson vanOverwater | May 12, 2008 1:39:58 AM

[i]While most of us seem to believe that there is no such thing as God, and have by and large accepted the rather bleak fact that there is ultimately no meaning to our existence[/i]

a. while most of those of the atheistic bent may 'know' this, very few will openly admit it, even to themselves. most spend their lives thrashing violently around ( PETA, Earth First, Marxism, Global Warming, etc ) trying to fill the hole that those beliefs create

b. you can stipulate to a completely atheistic universe ( Big Bang, Evolutionary origin ) and still arrive at a perfectly logical "meaning of life" which would provide purpose for it.

the failure of atheists to have noticed that such a thing is not only possible but obvious is an indicator of how infantile and lacking in imagination the philosophy truly is.

Posted by: bob k. mando | May 13, 2008 11:15:35 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed

Help 3 Quarks Daily

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD ADVERTISING



Please Visit Wikio

  • Wikio
  • Wikio Shopping
  • LCD Monitor
  • LCD TV
  • Recent Comments

    fred lapides on James Howard Kunstler: The tragedy of suburbia

    Frank on Costs of Living

    Jonathan on literary science?

    MissVolare on James Howard Kunstler: The tragedy of suburbia

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Adult Cells Steal Trick from Cancer to Become Stem Cell-Like

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Life Before Death

    Elatia Harris on literary science?

    Philip Graham on literary science?

    Elatia Harris on literary science?

    John Etnier on Salvador Dali on "What's My Line?"

    Stephen Potter on literary science?

    Philip Graham on literary science?

    stop tis not art on Perceptions: 2007 Venice Art Biennale

    Jonathan on literary science?

    Felix E F Larocca MD on The sexiest woman (barely) alive

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Costs of Living

    Dave Greene on James Howard Kunstler: The tragedy of suburbia

    Elatia Harris on literary science?

    Philip Graham on literary science?

    reader on literary science?

    Chris Schoen on literary science?

    Z-lot on Are Saint-Simonians Responsible for Modernity

    Winfield J. Abbe on The Effects of the Religious Right on Politics and on Religion

    Jesse on literary science?

    chris on Elise & Me: A Tale of Extreme Optical Seduction

    Acclaim For 3QD

    Best Non-European Weblog Winner


    Best Group Blog and Blog Most Deserving of Wider Attention Finalist


    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed