| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« a moses to remember: Charleton Heston (1923-2008) | Main | SAFFRON MOTHER, Part II »

April 07, 2008

Monday Poem

///

The Four Horse's Asses of the Necropolis
Jim Culleny

Why would the Four Horse's Asses Person_four__horses_asses_4
of the Necropolis
still strew fetid flowers
upon the path
of the Four Horsemen
of the Apocalypse,
as an ill-wind
blew the scent of aftermath
into the faces of a people
barely mewing?

Would even horse's asses
herd us down the trail
of our undoing?

Oh, yeah. They'll happily
have done their will
leaving us nil
while they are safely
toodle-ooing...


RE: An American "Nakbah"

///

Posted by Jim Culleny at 12:11 AM | Permalink

Comments

And who was it put these horse asses in power?
And lapped up their lies
Every day, every hour
The people, barely mewing
Are authors of their own undoing



Posted by: Jared | Apr 7, 2008 12:51:10 PM

Si. Con mucho gusto, tambien ...el critinos.

Posted by: J | Apr 7, 2008 1:12:55 PM

thanks god there is a congress to keep them in line. ps: before there was a Rice horsie, there was a Powell nag.

Posted by: fred lapides | Apr 7, 2008 4:11:42 PM

Shouldn't that be "Horses' Asses"? Four horses have four asses. The four asses belong to the four horses. They are the horses' asses.

Posted by: Fussy | Apr 7, 2008 4:27:34 PM

Just making sure you're paying attention. Well done!

And who was it put these horses' asses in power?
And lapped up their lies
Every day, every hour
The people, barely mewing
Are authors of their own undoing

Posted by: Jared | Apr 7, 2008 4:44:12 PM

I remember reading this poem in its original comment, and wondering if it would be highlighted on the front page. I'm glad to see that it has been. Excellent choice, Jim. Excellent poem, J.

Posted by: ghostman | Apr 7, 2008 7:45:23 PM

Fussy --

I'm not so sure.

Each indivudual shown here is clearly a horse's ass (each is one horse's ass). Each is the ass of one horse. So, in the case of these four at least, wouldn't that be four (4) horse's asses all tolled?

Anyway. I'm going with that. If you'd like to bring higher authority into the argument, such as my old English Teacher, Mr. Egge, I'm ready to reconsider.

Posted by: J | Apr 7, 2008 8:42:02 PM

J,

I wouldn't dare dispute Mr. Egge if he agrees with you. You are right that each horse has one ass. You could refer to one horse's ass. But in total they are four horses, not four horse.

Posted by: Fussy | Apr 7, 2008 9:34:20 PM

If it was a race, I would bet on Kinda Sleazy to win, and Oil Slick Dick to place.
How about you?

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Apr 8, 2008 1:28:11 AM

I'm with Jim, Fussy. Four horse's asses is better than four horses' assses. Or at least just as acceptible. My teachers are Strunk and White.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Apr 8, 2008 4:49:19 AM

Thank you Mr. Raza ...you and Mr. Egge.

J

Posted by: J | Apr 8, 2008 7:34:06 AM

How about Fowler's? From the 1996 edition:

"Some golden rules:
1 An apostrophe is required before a possessive s in the singular (the boy's hat, the water's edge) and after a possessive s in the plural (the boys' gymnasium, the ladies' maids, in four days' time). Except that in the small group of words that do not end in -s in the plural, the plural possessive is indicated by 's (children's shoes, men's boots, women's handbags, the oxen's hoofs)." (p. 61)

By my reading, this suggests four horses' asses.

Posted by: Fussy | Apr 8, 2008 12:43:50 PM

The honorific was made official some time ago for at least one of the four.

Jared: Thanks for the kind words in the post about laughter :-)

Posted by: Ruchira | Apr 8, 2008 1:20:02 PM

Ok, ok, in the spirit of compromise, how about: horse's' asses?

We can let Strunk and White duke it out with Fowler and focus on sending the present leadership off to the glue factory.

Posted by: J | Apr 8, 2008 1:40:09 PM

I gladly second the glue factory motion. My fussiness has to do with the possessive apostrophe, not with the idea that these four are, in fact, horses' asses.

Posted by: Fussy | Apr 8, 2008 1:43:09 PM

It's ok to be fussy about possessive apostrophes. In a system such as ours it's very important to know exactly who owns what.

Posted by: J | Apr 8, 2008 1:49:18 PM

No, it's not that. It's that apostrophes are so commonly misused, whether for possessives, plurals, or contractions. It's a pet peeve.

Posted by: Fussy | Apr 8, 2008 3:49:39 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

Elatia Harris on Here’s how to change the world

Sundar on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Thursday Poem

Raza Husain on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

Raza Husain on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

Jim Sanders on the hudson review

Ian Kaplan on Stephen Wolfram: Dropping In on Gottfried Leibniz

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed