March 22, 2008
Where angels no longer fear to tread
From The Economist:
By the standards of European scientific collaboration, €2m ($3.1m) is not a huge sum. But it might be the start of something that will challenge human perceptions of reality at least as much as the billions being spent by the European particle-physics laboratory (CERN) at Geneva. The first task of CERN's new machine, the Large Hadron Collider, which is due to open later this year, will be to search for the Higgs boson—an object that has been dubbed, with a certain amount of hyperbole, the God particle. The €2m, by contrast, will be spent on the search for God Himself—or, rather, for the biological reasons why so many people believe in God, gods and religion in general.
“Explaining Religion”, as the project is known, is the largest-ever scientific study of the subject. It began last September, will run for three years, and involves scholars from 14 universities and a range of disciplines from psychology to economics. And it is merely the latest manifestation of a growing tendency for science to poke its nose into the God business.
Religion cries out for a biological explanation. It is a ubiquitous phenomenon—arguably one of the species markers of Homo sapiens—but a puzzling one. It has none of the obvious benefits of that other marker of humanity, language. Nevertheless, it consumes huge amounts of resources. Moreover, unlike language, it is the subject of violent disagreements. Science has, however, made significant progress in understanding the biology of language, from where it is processed in the brain to exactly how it communicates meaning. Time, therefore, to put religion under the microscope as well.
More here. [Thanks to Felix E. F. Larocca.]
Posted by Abbas Raza at 06:49 AM | Permalink






Comments
Perhaps the highly uninformed writer at the Economist ought to look into the history of the term "Shibboleth" and a bit more of history before they write something so utterly ridiculous as "Moreover, unlike language, it is the subject of violent disagreements."
Language has not been the subject of violent disagreement? That is just too funny.
Posted by: Mark | Mar 22, 2008 1:05:41 PM
the Mother Tongue is not the most rigorous of books, but it has some interesting details on the often violent relations language groups have had with each other even fairly recently.
Posted by: Carlos | Mar 23, 2008 10:12:11 PM
Post a comment