February 08, 2008
Why Rome Fell, Hitler Rose, Enron Failed, and My Sister Stole My Mother's Boyfriend
Robert J. Richards in American Scientist:
In the 1930s, Sigmund Freud collaborated with American ambassador William C. Bullitt to produce a psychoanalytic study of President Woodrow Wilson, which portrayed him as suffering from a libido that had been blocked of normal expression and rechanneled into a messianic identification with his father and Jesus Christ. The manuscript was finally published in 1967 to scornful and suspicious reviews. The notion that even the master of psychoanalytic technique could provide a scientific study of a man he had never met, whose history he learned at second and third hand and about whom he had an admitted prejudice, was rejected not only by the sober historian Richard Hofstadter but also by the eminent practitioner of psychobiography Erik H. Erikson. Erikson judged, on the basis of internal evidence, that very little of the final version had actually been written by Freud himself.
No such exculpating considerations appear to relieve Barbara Oakley of responsibility for Evil Genes: Why Rome Fell, Hitler Rose, Enron Failed, and My Sister Stole My Mother's Boyfriend. Oakley, an associate professor of systems engineering, became interested in what she calls the "Machiavellian" personality as the result of long experience with the erratic and deviant behavior of the sister referred to in her title. The Machiavellian syndrome was initially defined in the 1950s and principally consists of highly manipulative behavior done without moral scruple. Studies that Oakley cites associate the syndrome with another set of traits, which also characterized her sister: those of the borderline personality disorder, which includes rapid mood swings, impulsive decisions and self-damaging actions.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 05:21 AM | Permalink






Comments
Pathographies are out, self-styled, self-serving analysis of psychopathologies are in.
If one adds to that, some neuroscientific "evidence" to give support to one's ideas, the game turns into a checkmate.
But, caveat... It's risky stuff
Recent studies demonstrate that whenever you want to make a point, no matter how inconclusive your facts, do it basing your conclusions in the tenets of neuroscience --- and, voila --- you have a book!
But not an honest one, necessarily
Posted by: Felix E. F. Larocca MD | Feb 8, 2008 6:45:50 AM
Pathographies are out, self-styled, self-serving analysis of psychopathologies are in !
Posted by: Lilu | Feb 8, 2008 9:18:14 AM
Lilu, sorry you took it wrong. But, you can get it right, after all...
Visit: www.monografias.com
Enter my name in the search engine and choose articles related to:
Sindrome de Dino and
(NP) Narcisismo Patologico.
Good luck!
Posted by: Felix E. F. larocca MD | Feb 9, 2008 6:00:48 AM
Post a comment