| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Rotten English | Main | Of Secularism, Headscarves, and Gender Justice »

February 12, 2008

Harvard Proposal May Revolutionize Academic Publishing

It seems to me that with arXiv, PLOS, (thanks to Sean Carroll for the corrections) and other online systems, it was just a matter of time. In the NYT:

Publish or perish has long been the burden  of  every aspiring university professor. But the question the Harvard faculty will decide on Tuesday is whether to publish  —  on the Web, at least  —   free.

Faculty members are scheduled to vote on a measure that would permit Harvard to distribute their scholarship online, instead of signing exclusive agreements with scholarly journals that often have tiny readerships and high subscription costs.

Although the outcome of Tuesday’s vote would apply only to Harvard’s arts and sciences faculty, the impact, given the university’s prestige, could be significant for the open-access movement, which seeks to make scientific and scholarly research available to as many people as possible at no cost.

“In place of a closed, privileged and costly system, it will help open up the world of learning to everyone who wants to learn,” said Robert Darnton, director of the university library. “It will be a first step toward freeing scholarship from the stranglehold of commercial publishers by making it freely available on our own university repository.”

{H/t: Maeve Adams]

      

Posted by Robin Varghese at 09:32 AM | Permalink

Comments

This marks the end of the "publish or perish" tradition and of the stranglehold that has made of inane academics the controlling force of "science" --- as they see it.

It was not wisdom on anybody's part that prompted this change. It was the realization, by the old establishment, that the Internet was slowly squeezing them out of the Ivory Tower of undue influence and undeserved control.

Now it'll be different...

Posted by: Felix E. F. Larocca MD | Feb 12, 2008 9:41:04 AM

Doubtless a change but how then do we judge scholarly achievement witout peer review? Would you hire a person based on quantity of work put up on the net?

I knew of a guy that, seeking a new job in a hurry, published some 6 articles in a very short time. When I asked how good they might be, he said it was quantity that they counted, not quality!

Publish on the net, by all means, but ought it not be peer reviewed.

Posted by: fred lapides | Feb 12, 2008 10:07:02 AM

This is an excellent idea and I hope it will be the end of publish or perish. Just because articles are published on the web rather than in expensive and obscure journals does not mean they can't be peer-reviewed prior to posting. I welcome the democratization of information in all its forms.

Posted by: Jared | Feb 12, 2008 10:19:35 AM

I think you mean "arXiv" and "PLOS." Otherwise, there's no question that free open access is coming. Physicists are completely baffled that there is even a discussion about this, as they've been doing it for years with nothing but positive effects. (Except possibly that people write too many papers.)

Posted by: Sean Carroll | Feb 12, 2008 12:41:30 PM

Information wants to be free.

Posted by: Jim H. | Feb 12, 2008 1:24:44 PM

Finally. Can this please expand to books? I worked in a academic library for several years and was amazed to find that there's a subset of the publishing industry that is solely institutional. When a paperback lists for $119.95, university libraries are its only intended customer. Which basically guarantees that no one will ever read it.

Posted by: occam | Feb 12, 2008 4:25:32 PM

As a writer of historical fantasy too often frustrated by seeing intriguing articles on mythology and history firewalled, I can only welcome open access. Obviously care should be taken that peer review is enforced, but this development will help a lot in terms of educating the lay audience.

Posted by: Sajia Kabir | Feb 12, 2008 4:26:41 PM

You all might be interested in the serendipitous so here's a link to think about: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/02/06/openaccess_is_t.html. I'm no longer in academia but the ingrown sometimes self-serving nature of the publications is still a well-remembered source of humor to me.

Posted by: rhbee | Feb 12, 2008 11:14:15 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Mike Cope on Thursday Poem

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Christopher on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Winfield J. Abbe on Walter Isaacson on Einstein

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Carlos on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

J. Hawkins on The Tipping Point Theory of Racial Segregation: Fascinating but Mythological?

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Elatia Harris on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

J. Hawkins on Vatican embraces Oscar Wilde

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Ken Pidcock on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed