| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« from rats to orgasms | Main | Sojourns: On Recessions and Intellectual History: The Case of English »

February 10, 2008

Automatic writing

In the Guardian:

The book-writing machine works simply, at least in principle. First, one feeds it a recipe for writing a particular genre of book - a tome about crossword puzzles, say, or a market outlook for products. Then hook the computer up to a big database full of info about crossword puzzles or market information. The computer uses the recipe to select data from the database and write and format it into book form.

Parker estimates that it costs him about 12p to write a book, with, perhaps, not much difference in quality from what a competent wordsmith or an MBA might produce.

Nothing but the title need actually exist until somebody orders a copy. At that point, a computer assembles the book's content and prints up a single copy.

Among Parker's bestselling books (as ranked by Amazon.co.uk) one finds surprises.

His fifth-best seller is Webster's Albanian to English Crossword Puzzles: Level 1.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 05:40 PM | Permalink

Comments

This is interesting. What with this and every other robot cutting out a laborer, I figure someday there'll be six or seven billion people on the planet with nothing to do. And you know how idle minds are the devil's workshop...

Posted by: Jim | Feb 10, 2008 7:14:40 PM

Well, mankind has already been too clever for it's own good - there are actually humans alive, today, in the year 2008, on Earth, who claim to be 'a little bit frightened' by the thought that machines may 'one day' surpass humans on every conceivable level.

Machines already HAVE surpassed us, long ago.

Take the most versatile supercomputer you can find, and people will say: hey, but does it walk up and down the stairs without falling and breaking itself?

Aye, we're so smart... you can emulate the decisions and consequences that a regular human being accumulates before 'it' expires, and if you would buy the best of the best, you'd have a system that will waste most of it's time cycling and doing nothing... still, if you'd have to get insurance, just in case the system gets damaged or broken beyond your ability to restore it - well, good luck!

However, if you'd take an actual HUMAN to do your stuff, you can easily wipe it out once it no longer serves your purposes... Since humans are so much 'better' and so much more adaptive on a real-time basis in an organic environment, they have become expendible to a point where building a machine to do the work that a slave can do for free... well, it would be ridiculous...

The slave doesn't cost any money, and is easily dispatched at the end of whatever you need it's abilities for.

I'm beginning to wonder why one would even consider further technological development to make machines that shall one day be 'intelligent' enough to be just as versatile and just as easily replacable as them feeble milk-suckers,... the humans.

Posted by: Yiri | Feb 13, 2008 8:42:28 AM

I anxiously await the development of a computer that can compose music like Mozart or write plays like Shakespeare.

Posted by: Jared | Feb 13, 2008 12:32:32 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Politics Prize

Donate to Todd Shea

More info about Todd Shea and his work here on 3QD.

3QD ADVERTISING

3QD on Facebook

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

czrpb on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

chris on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

odysseus14 on The World's Fastest Animal Takes New York

Daniel on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Robin on The Incomparable Economist

odysseus14 on The Incomparable Economist

Cyrus Hall on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Jane Lenoir on The Humanists: Frederick Wiseman's High School (1968)

Norman Costa on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

Norman Costa on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

czrpb on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Daniel on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Elatia Harris on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

chris on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Carlos on you can't handle the truth

Nick Smyth on you can't handle the truth

eric on you can't handle the truth

Ruchira on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Randolyn Zinn on Shards and Fragments: Eva Hesse Studioworks

Luke Lea on Hollywood gives biologists a helping hand

Chris Schoen on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

Rhea on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

Chris Schoen on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

J.H. on you can't handle the truth

J.H. on The World's Fastest Animal Takes New York

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes


Logos designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed