| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Derek Walcott Remembers Elizabeth Hardwick | Main | Anti-Semitism and Poland »

January 22, 2008

Testing "Gaydar"

Matt Kaplan is ScienceNOW:

Talk about "gaydar." In just a fraction of a second, people can accurately judge the sexual orientation of other individuals by glancing at their faces, according to new research. The finding builds on the growing theory that the subconscious mind detects and probably guides much more of human behavior than is realized.

Humans are remarkably good at making snap judgments about others. In a hallmark study conducted by psychologists Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal in 1994, people shown 2-second video clips of professors teaching formed opinions about the professors' teaching abilities that were uncannily similar to evaluations written by students at the end of a semester. The results led psychologists to begin questioning what else people might detect in a glance.

Ambady and colleague Nicholas Rule, both at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts, wondered about sexual orientation. They showed men and women photos of 90 faces belonging to homosexual men and heterosexual men for intervals ranging from 33 milliseconds to 10 seconds. When given 100 milliseconds or more to view a face, participants correctly identified sexual orientation nearly 70% of the time. Volunteers were less accurate at shorter durations, and their accuracy did not get better at durations beyond 100 milliseconds, the team reports in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. "What is most interesting is that increased exposure time did not improve the results," says Ambady.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 06:33 PM | Permalink

Comments

This is quite familiar. Malcolm Gladwell's book 'Blink' is one long argument for respecting the power of the snap judgement. He makes a very convincing case, so I am glad to see some scientists backing it up with lab testing.

Posted by: Richard | Jan 22, 2008 9:27:50 PM

Gladwell also offers the contrary argument in his analysis of the case of Amadou Diallo. Snap judgments can be horribly mistaken. Snap judgments, based on training and experience, are more accurate by and large, than those made in the dark, but even then, your gut'll git ya now and again.

Posted by: Carlos | Jan 22, 2008 9:44:14 PM

If facial physiognomy can be used to guess sexual orientation, that would seem relevant to the question of whether orientation is innate (unless people are just judging by hairstyle or expression...might be useful to do the experiment with subjects asked to assume neutral expressions and their hair covered up, if this hasn't been done already). Would also be interesting to feed people's facial features into one of those computer programs that stores them mathematically in terms of various facial landmarks (like this one) and see if there were statistical differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals.

Posted by: Jesse M. | Jan 23, 2008 12:09:50 AM

Interesting findings, though I think that focusing on our ability to determine sexual orientation is a bit of a stretch in that our concept of sexual orientation is a social construct since our sexual orientation, just like our brains, which determine or sexual preferrences, are plastic and able to change throughout life unless social restriction are in effect that deny or limit those changes.
The human mind is the product of its evolution and like so many of our primate cousins our survival depends on our abilities to visually asses a situation for threats, opportunities and status within the context of a social structure which is itself instintctually guided.

Posted by: Doug l | Jan 23, 2008 11:00:31 AM

This study and most others like it are flawed to the extent that people associate stereotypical characteristics (generally, effeminate with gay men; butch/masculine with gay women) with sexual orientations; I guarantee you the results would be much different if you took a sampling of "straight-acting"/closeted men and women (i.e., the kind who would never allow themselves to be used in a study).

Posted by: thegayrecluse | Jan 23, 2008 6:53:05 PM

Thanks for the great and motivating post! I fully agree with you especially on letting your subconscious mind help you achieve success. Do check out http://www.subconscious-mind.org, they have a whole host of interesting and helpful articles.

Posted by: mind | Jan 23, 2008 8:07:19 PM

To "thegayrecluse":

why wouldn't "straight-acting" gay men allow themselves to be used in a study like this? Are you assuming that a gay man who doesn't live up to steretype must be ashamed and self-hating?

Posted by: anonymous | Jan 23, 2008 10:15:51 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed

Help 3 Quarks Daily

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD ADVERTISING



Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Please Visit Wikio

  • Wikio
  • Wikio Shopping
  • LCD Monitor
  • LCD TV
  • Recent Comments

    Nick Smyth on Religion Naturalized?

    Elatia Harris on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Winfield J. Abbe on Mysteries of time, and the multiverse

    Jim on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Sagredo on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    Ken D. on Sunday Poem

    Ken D. on Sunday Poem

    Elatia Harris on The Dysfunctional Jameses

    Dave Ranning on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Kevin on The Dysfunctional Jameses

    Sagredo on Remembering Jesse Helms

    cora on SAFFRON MOTHER, Part III

    Dave Ranning on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Remembering Jesse Helms

    missvolare on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    missvolare on Mysteries of time, and the multiverse

    Jim on Remembering Jesse Helms

    aditya on Mysteries of time, and the multiverse

    Damien on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    Dave Ranning on The Dysfunctional Jameses

    Jim on The Reverse Graffiti Project

    Dr Felix E F Larocca on The Mirror Neuron Revolution: Explaining What Makes Humans Social

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    Felix E F Larocca MD on The Wisdom of Whores

    Acclaim For 3QD


    Best Non-European Weblog Winner


    Best Group Blog and Blog Most Deserving of Wider Attention Finalist


    Wikio - Top Blogs

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed