December 11, 2007
Doris Lessing: The Nobel Speech
We are in a fragmenting culture, where our certainties of even a few decades ago are questioned and where it is common for young men and women, who have had years of education, to know nothing of the world, to have read nothing, knowing only some speciality or other, for instance, computers.
What has happened to us is an amazing invention - computers and the internet and TV. It is a revolution. This is not the first revolution the human race has dealt with. The printing revolution, which did not take place in a matter of a few decades, but took much longer, transformed our minds and ways of thinking. A foolhardy lot, we accepted it all, as we always do, never asked: "What is going to happen to us now, with this invention of print?" In the same way, we never thought to ask, "How will our lives, our way of thinking, be changed by the internet, which has seduced a whole generation with its inanities so that even quite reasonable people will confess that, once they are hooked, it is hard to cut free, and they may find a whole day has passed in blogging etc?"
Very recently, anyone even mildly educated would respect learning, education and our great store of literature. Of course we all know that when this happy state was with us, people would pretend to read, would pretend respect for learning. But it is on record that working men and women longed for books, evidenced by the founding of working-men's libraries, institutes, and the colleges of the 18th and 19th centuries. Reading, books, used to be part of a general education. Older people, talking to young ones, must understand just how much of an education reading was, because the young ones know so much less.
We all know this sad story. But we do not know the end of it. We think of the old adage, "Reading maketh a full man" - reading makes a woman and a man full of information, of history, of all kinds of knowledge.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:00 PM | Permalink





Comments
Of course, one is made aware of Doris Lessing's speech - and one's knowledge and education is furthered - thanks to the very medium she decries.
Yes, there is a lot of noise between the signals (and is the same not true of literature?) but it's not all "inanities".
Posted by: Donald Ritchie | Dec 11, 2007 9:20:06 PM
I'm going out on a limb here, but we all kind of like the Internet, right? I think it's important even so to listen to tirades against it by towering figures such as Lessing. There's truth in what she says, just not as much as she thinks. She doesn't get it, but she does get it. What she's really saying is not to waste too much time -- a crime, from her present perspective. I can remember when teachers inveighed against television that way. Well, I haven't lost serious time to television, and my work day is set up so that I occasionally have 10 or 15 minutes that I don't have to be immersed in the job -- so of course I love the Internet, because how far could I get with re-reading Tolstoy in 10 or 15 minutes? Well, it would add up, wouldn't it? But it wouldn't be the luxurious several hours-long thing that Lessing thinks of as reading. It would just be that in small increments, and in a poor-spirited way, I could re-read Tolstoy in two years of the kind of time I now give to the Internet. Hm.
Nadia Boulanger, another giant of Lessing's generation, regretted that she never learned Russian, simply for lack of time. But, she reflected on her deathbed, she could have gotten very far with it if she had just given it 10 minutes a day, every day. I truly believe these scolding words from stellar high achievers soon to shuffle off this mortal coil are meant only to make us think, and periodically re-evaluate. That can only be good.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 11, 2007 10:01:28 PM
Elatia nails it right on the nose!
Posted by: beajerry | Dec 13, 2007 11:11:45 AM
Post a comment