| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Subcontinental Drift | Main | Stormin' Norman dies »

November 10, 2007

Limit Telephotography

At Trevor Paglen's website:

Hangars_thumb_2 A number of military bases and installations exist in some of the remotest parts of the United States, hidden deep in western deserts and buffered by dozens of miles of restricted land. Many of these sites are so remote, in fact, that there is nowhere on Earth where a civilian might be able to see them with an unaided eye. In order to produce images of these remote and hidden landscapes, therefore, some unorthodox viewing and imaging techniques are required.

Limit-telephotography involves photographing landscapes that cannot be seen with the unaided eye. The technique employs high powered telescopes whose focal lengths range between 1300mm and 7000mm. At this level of magnification, hidden aspects of the landscape become apparent.

Unmarked_planes_thumb_2 Limit-telephotography most closely resembles astrophotography, a technique that astronomers use to photograph objects that might be trillions of miles from Earth. In some ways, however, it is easier to photograph the depths of the solar system than it is to photograph the recesses of the military industrial complex. Between Earth and Jupiter (500 million miles away), for example, there are about five miles of thick, breathable atmosphere. In contrast, there are upwards of forty miles of thick atmosphere between an observer and the sites depicted in this series.

More here.

Posted by Sughra Raza at 08:08 AM | Permalink

Comments

"In contrast, there are upwards of forty miles of thick atmosphere between an observer and the sites depicted in this series."

None of the photos is from further than 22 miles away. If he is suggesting that photons have to travel from his lens-to the site-and back again...well.

He does seem to have demonstrated that the US government possesses 737s, and that they are cautiously willing to use them.

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 10, 2007 11:18:25 AM

The article doesn't state that the images which accompany it are in fact the maximum reach of this system. As someone very familiar with the physical geogrpahy of the Basin and Range province, I can say the the figure of "40 miles" is a kind of "modulus" in that desert and it is a fairly close average of the distances from one range to another...and from one water source to another. It might be worthwhile to bear in mind that the conditions of the atmosphere can varied so that sometimes short distances are enough to obscure the clarity of the image and at other times, for example: during periods of strong high-pressure, the air is extraordinarily clear to the point where estimating distance can be quite deceptive. Next time you're in Vegas, rent a car and head 5 hours north to Baker and checkout Great Basin National Park there.

Posted by: doug l | Nov 11, 2007 9:27:39 AM

Well let's hope I change my mind someday, but right now all I can think is "I will never go to Vegas unless something has gone horribly wrong"

I did look at Great Basin photos. They reminded me of the east side of the southern Sierras. I used to make the long trip from LA to Mammoth Mountain once or twice each year and we did a fair amount of side trips to check out geological wonder spots and "boulder." Some days you could see forever.

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 11, 2007 9:39:36 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Our Science Prize

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Hamid on Abandon all hope, ye who enter this thread

Rebekah on Only Philosophers Go to Hell

Adrian Morgan on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Ruchira on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Ruchira on Just Herself

matt on Friday Poem

Stefan on Questioning Willusionism

Saba R. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Faisal K. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

Anand Manikutty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Sandra on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

DAS on Questioning Willusionism

Raza on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

DAS on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

John Ballard on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

Chris Gudmann on How Bad Is It?

Cormac O Rafferty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

ajith on Science is Not About Certainty: A Philosophy of Physics

Ralston McTodd on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed