| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Aunt Benazir's false promises | Main | The Left’s Identity Crisis »

November 17, 2007

Clinton & Clinton

From The New York Times:

FOR LOVE OF POLITICS Bill and Hillary Clinton: The White House Years By Sally Bedell Smith.

Clintons_2 He is a virtuosic performer with reckless appetites. She is a plodding but savvy political practitioner. Her cool self-possession and occasional dogmatism stand in sharp contrast to his love of speechmaking, his “compulsive need to seduce” and his ideological elasticity. Both are cynical idealists, having been conditioned by decades of combat, going back to Bill’s first campaign, an unsuccessful House race in 1974, to see enemies and vast conspiracies behind every setback. They are genuinely fond of each other, even if he occasionally strays and she occasionally shouts profanity-laced tirades (although, as Myers tells the author, “she always crawled back to him”). And in a profession generally known for prevarication, the Clintons are notable in their readiness to bend the truth to fit political and personal necessity.

Smith covers all the familiar territory — the health care debacle, the Middle East, Northern Ireland, welfare reform, the budget surplus, Monica Lewinsky, impeachment — and manages to come up with some fascinating tidbits. She reports, for instance, that during one of Hillary’s private White House strategy sessions for her incipient race for the Senate seat then held by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the senator’s salty-tongued wife and longtime campaign manager, Liz, made her annoyance clear to the first lady. “You lie about what happens,” Mrs. Moynihan scolded the upstart who would dare occupy her husband’s seat. “You mislead people. You haven’t taken advice.” The pragmatic Hillary, although “disconcerted by such candor,” sucked it up and kept inviting her back “to take full advantage of Liz Moynihan’s unrivaled experience.”

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 10:05 AM | Permalink

Comments

This is an interesting article. I'm currently reading Bernstein's A Woman in Charge, which comes to some of these same observations.

Unfortunately, commentary on the Clintons (Hillary especially) is so reductive. For example, to just suggest only that Hillary is "controlling," as many do (and not just on Fox), is not only sexist, but inaccurate and damages that national debate over the next presidency.

Posted by: steve | Nov 17, 2007 12:41:30 PM

You know what? I'm Hillaried out already. In 1991, I thought she was just fantastic, and I have had 16 years to watch her lie like a lawyer -- that is, lie like a rug -- and artifact just about every emotion consistent with getting where she wants to go. That the prospective first woman president has to be a poll-driven, lobby-corrupted prevaricator without peer whose moral center is harder to find than the original hole in the ozone layer is baffling and shaming to me. Until I have to hold my nose and vote for her for no better reason than that she's not an admitted Republican, I'll put my money, hope and energy to use on behalf of better candidates -- of which there are many. Meanwhile, I deeply wish this blog would go Hillary-free.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Nov 17, 2007 3:43:25 PM

Elatia, I think you will find you need to pace yourself.

Meanwhile, could it be true that Wolf Blitzer, having been deemed acceptable by the Clinton campaign, is seeking a new (a la Rather's "courage") sign off?

I'd like to suggest: "Fly my pretties!"

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 17, 2007 6:21:48 PM

Carlos, you're right. If I eat my liver out over the situation, it'll do nobody any good, least of all me. But I can't help being sorry that an old, white, vengeful, over-exposed club woman with tired table politics, chest freezer ethics, meaning-free rhetoric and sky-high non-accountability has to be The One. But I'm still not over the death of Barbara Jordan, and neither should you be. She was, actually, The One.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Nov 17, 2007 8:29:57 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Louise Gordon on Leszek Kołakowski, 1927-2009

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Suraj on India, China and the polemics of the East

Ken Pidcock on Vague Scientist

Elatia Harris on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Slocum on The Tipping Point Theory of Racial Segregation: Fascinating but Mythological?

maniza on Why the Left is wrong on Iran

Louise Gordon on Vague Scientist

eli on Vague Scientist

Elatia Harris on Vague Scientist

Abbas Raza on Why the Left is wrong on Iran

Pete Chapman on Vague Scientist

fred lapides on What's the baby sitter up to?

Mike Cope on Thursday Poem

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Christopher on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Winfield J. Abbe on Walter Isaacson on Einstein

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed