| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Perceptions: art outside | Main | A Case of the Mondays: List of Most Overrated Things »

November 26, 2007

Angels & Demons: Three Drafts from a Script Postponed

Surely the American public supports the Hollywood writers in their labor struggles and fervently hopes that the writers’ strike be made permanent. Writing is work, and work is a dignified contribution to society. Making someone write for CBS’s drama Cane is an inhumane labor practice and I hope this strike puts an end to it once and for all.Angelsanddemons

All joking aside, the Hollywood writer’s strike has already begun to affect not only television but also moviemaking. The first high-profile casualty, Angels & Demons, the Prequel to the Da Vinci Code, has been postponed by Sony Pictures because they haven’t yet ironed out the script. Now, all due respect to the scriptwriter, who was awarded an Oscar for A Beautiful Mind, a challenging adaptation from a nonfiction book. In perfect sincerity, adapting something as dumb as Angels & Demons is quite a difficult task. Scriptwriters are actually performing a public service in helping us not read this sort of book. They should receive the literary equivalent of “combat pay” for added trauma in the line of duty, which I’m sure takes months or years off their lives. The writers, of course, are entirely in the right in their labor dispute: if they are going to sacrifice themselves in this fashion, the least Hollywood can do is pay them fairly.

But about Angels & Demons. Its main character, Harvard "symbologist" Robert Langdon, is the same protagonist from The Da Vinci Code, although A&D was in fact written first. The two stories - calling them "novels" would be pretentious, they are fictionalized bargain-basement conspiracy theories - couldn't be more different. The secret society battling the Catholic Church in Angels & Demons is called The Illuminati, and its female lead is a mysterious and sexy Italian babe rather than a mysterious and sexy French babe. G32151975550770

Here is part of one of the opening chapters of Angels & Demons, excerpted from Dan Brown's official website:

Robert Langdon awoke with a start from his nightmare. The phone beside his bed was ringing. Dazed, he picked up the receiver.

"Hello?"

"I'm looking for Robert Langdon," a man's voice said.

Langdon sat up in his empty bed [sic] and tried to clear his mind.

"This…is Robert Langdon."

He squinted at his digital clock. It was 5:18 A.M.

"I must see you immediately."

"Who is this?"

"My name is Maximilian Kohler. I'm a Discrete Particle Physicist."

I imagine the screenplay adaptation of this early, crucial scene was trying. Perhaps the first draft read something like this:

Langdon awakens from bed, dazed. A phone is ringing.

Langdon: Hello?

Kohler: I'm looking for Robert Langdon.

Langdon sits up, trying to clear his mind.

Langdon: This…is Robert Langdon.

Langdon squints at his digital clock: 5:18 A.M.

Kohler: I must see you immediately.

Langdon: Who is this?

Kohler: My name is Maximilian Kohler. I'm a Discrete Particle Physicist.

Okay, this needs some refining. The Hollywood Guild writer’s craft involves compression, the deft conveyance of information within an aura of suspense. Here’s a hypothetical second draft:

Langdon awakens from bed, dazed, and picks up a ringing phone.

Kohler: This is Maximilian Kohler. I'm a Discrete Particle Physicist. I'm looking for Robert Langdon.

Langdon sits up, trying to clear his mind.

Langdon: This…is Robert Langdon.

Langdon squints at his digital clock: 5:18 A.M.

Kohler: I must see you immediately.

By the third draft, a sort of buzzing elegance must pervade a Guild-quality script. Perhaps something like this will emerge after hours of painstaking work:

A phone rings. Robert Langdon awakens from bed, dazed, and squints at his digital clock: 5:18 A.M.

Langdon: Langdon.

Kohler: Max Kohler here. I’m a scientist, but I badly need the help of a detective.

As long as these fictional drafts of the Angels & Demons script are being published in advance of the movie’s release, why not add a fictional Post-It Note to put on the very first page, reading, in the scrawl of a triumphant American craftsman and scriptwriter: By Jove, Dan Brown, I’ve made your characters sound human!

Posted by J. M. Tyree at 01:18 AM | Permalink

Comments

The phone does not ring, as Langdon has disconnected it.
Suddenly, a gasping pigeon bursts through the open window and flops bleeding onto Langdon's face. Startled but cool, Langdon turns instictively to the window , just in time to see an Amazonian warrior with a blowpipe disapear behind a chimneystack on the roof opposite. Then he looks back at the dead pigeon: Its neck is transfigured with an Aztec arrowhead dart. On its left foot is a copper vial, containing the faithful bird's final message. Langdon switches on the Arouet table lamp and effortlessly deciphers the encoded Etruscan script on the tiny papyrus scroll: " From Eva Van Chunkles: The secret of making your p*n*s HUGE!!!"
"Fucking spammers!" Langdon groans and goes back to sleep.

Posted by: aguy109 | Nov 26, 2007 9:49:29 AM

Scab.

Posted by: nobody | Nov 26, 2007 10:03:07 AM

Hilarious post!

Posted by: beajerry | Nov 26, 2007 11:04:32 AM

The third draft is truly Shakespearean.

Posted by: Sagredo | Nov 26, 2007 10:15:01 PM

Josh, you can't have read the book, questionable practice for even the satirical reviewer. If you had read A&D (as I did, only book at the Marriott Beach Club shop), you would have targeted the final action sequence for ridicule. I will leave the contents of this sequence for you to read (needn't give Brown ten dollars, just hit Wikipedia). Well, okay then: the Pope's evil aide BASE jumps from a flaming helicopter after exploding a canister of antimatter over St.Peter's... Structurally, this scene is really more of the denoument.
But really, JM, "Dan Brown isn't a serious writer"? Next week: Fantasia isn't a serious songwriter, Thomas Kinkade isn't a serious Christian, painter or Christian painter? Leave the fish in the barrel, Tex. Plenty of prose atrocities among the PEN finalists, more satisfying quarry.

Posted by: david | Nov 27, 2007 1:21:39 AM

What on earth is a "Discrete" particle physicist?!

All particles are discrete! A particle physicist is what he is.

Posted by: Nikolai Nikola | Nov 27, 2007 4:02:54 AM

Good point Nikolai but seeing he called at 5:18 AM my guess is that he's actually an Indiscrete Particle Physicist.

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Nov 27, 2007 2:01:23 PM

Hello 3 Quarks Daily folks!

I just wanted to let you know that we featured another one of your posts in the Art & Culture section of The Issue, a blog newspaper that culls all of the best blog posts each day. You can see the post by going to www.TheIssue.com. Keep up the great work and we'll keep reading!

Matt
The Issue

Posted by: Matt | Nov 27, 2007 4:54:14 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Our Science Prize

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Hamid on Abandon all hope, ye who enter this thread

Rebekah on Only Philosophers Go to Hell

Adrian Morgan on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Ruchira on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Ruchira on Just Herself

matt on Friday Poem

Stefan on Questioning Willusionism

Saba R. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Faisal K. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

Anand Manikutty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Sandra on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

DAS on Questioning Willusionism

Raza on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

DAS on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

John Ballard on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

Chris Gudmann on How Bad Is It?

Cormac O Rafferty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

ajith on Science is Not About Certainty: A Philosophy of Physics

Ralston McTodd on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed