October 18, 2007
crazy ugly heroic socrates
Once every schoolchild knew the tale of the death of Socrates. The grieving friends, the sage’s matter-of-fact reports of how far his paralysis had progressed, the unstinting discussion of philosophy, and the final reminder of his debt to the gods before he fell silent: though a staple of moral education forty years ago, these are things now less well-known, perhaps less relevant. Emily Wilson’s book The Death of Socrates is the latest in Profile’s series reassessing historical moments, following reappraisals of King Alfred, of the assassination of Julius Caesar, and of Guernica; the summer of 1967 and the 1916 siege at the Dublin GPO will be treated in forthcoming volumes. A professor of Classics at the University of Pennsylvania, Wilson has written a sprightly and illuminating account of the events surrounding Socrates’ execution by means of a self-administered drink of hemlock; the probable historical reasons for his trial and judgment; and the ways in which later ages – from Socrates’ immediate successors among the Greeks, through the Romans, Christian apologists, Renaissance thinkers, Enlightenment sages and anxious moderns – have understood the death of Socrates. Her style is engagingly straightforward and inclusive. In short punchy sentences, she suggests that her readers will learn “how this event has been recycled, reinterpreted and re-evaluated . . . . You too must find your own vision of Socrates”. At times, her tone has the deliberate simplification of a freshman lecture course; yet, while the book wisely takes no prior knowledge for granted, it is scrupulous in drawing attention to differences of academic opinion.
more from the TLS here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 09:10 AM | Permalink






Comments
Socrates got what he deserved. Democracy has no room for those who dissent!
Posted by: fred lapides | Oct 18, 2007 9:13:31 AM
"that Xenophon’s Socrates would now be running motivational seminars on self-empowerment – but always informative and enjoyable"-- so true.
He thought the map was the actual territory (and not a very accurate map)--
Socrates was part of the Greek "Reagan Revolution" that brought the Right and Decadence with it--
5th Century Athens, and the progress it has had on our very lives, was about to have it's history altered.
Socrates was the self-help New Age guru of the Greek Right.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Oct 18, 2007 1:22:18 PM
However, Athens at that stage was not much of a democracy, despite its public image as the "cradle of democracy." The reviewer rightly points out that, after the Peloponnesian War, "its democracy was in a precarious state."
Read Thucydides between the lines. (Actually, you can read his lines themselves in a lot of places and come to the same conclusion.) Athens' "democracy" was as much manipulated by a power elite as the U.S. and other "first-world" countries are now. Thucydides shows how this elite precipitated the war and drove it to its disastrous (for Athens) conclusion, and thus provides an amazingly relevant commentary on U.S. history since WW II.
Posted by: JonJ | Oct 19, 2007 12:04:33 AM
Jon-
I agree, Athens was in collapse from war and epidemic.
However, the world that we live in was defined from 5th Century Athens (From Atomic Theory, Medical Ethics, Scientific Method, the Dialectic, Democratic Institutions, Theater, Art. etc)--
Socrates was essentially a creation of Plato, as a character to promote Authoritarian and Conservative policies.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Oct 19, 2007 11:12:37 AM
Wow, good thoughts, but your font is awful!
Posted by: willie mink | Oct 19, 2007 1:37:41 PM
Post a comment