September 10, 2007
The Prince of Poets: Arab Poetry’s Answer to American Idol
Imagine an American TV network deciding to take the American Idol format and apply it to poetry; lining up poets to read their poems in front of temperamental judges while the nation gets out its mobile phones to vote for its favorite poet. One can be sure the show would not survive the first commercial break before the chastened executives pull the plug on it and replace it with yet another series on the Life and Times of Nicole Ritchie. Yet, that was exactly the formula for the latest TV sensation to take Arab countries by storm.
Perhaps the only thing that is as hard as translating Arab poetry to other languages is trying to explain to non-Arabs the extent of poetry’s popularity, importance and Arabs’ strong attachment to it. Whereas poetry in America has been largely reduced to a ceremonial eccentricity that survives thanks to grants and subsidies from fanatics who care about it too much, in the Arab world it remains amongst the most popular forms of both literature and entertainment. Whereas America’s top poets may struggle to fill a small Barnes & Noble store for a reading, Palestine’s Mahmoud Darwish has filled football stadiums with thousands of fans eager to hear his unique recital of his powerful poems. And while in America a good poetry collection can expect to sell some 2,000 copies, in the Arab world the poems of pre-Islamic era poets are still widely read today in their original words, as are those from the different Islamic eras leading to the present. The late Syrian poet Nizar Qabbani had a cult following across the Arab world, and his romantic poems have for decades constituted standard covert currency between lovers.
The Arab World has had its own enormously successful pop music answer to American Idol in Superstar which has concluded its fourth season with resounding success, unearthing some real stars of today’s thriving Arabic cheesy pop scene. But a few months ago, the governors of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi took a bold move by organizing a similar contest for poets. This comes as another step in Abu Dhabi’s ambitious attempts to use its petro-dollars to transform itself into the capital of Arab culture, and one of the world’s leading cultural centers; a Florence to Dubai’s London.
The show, named Prince of Poets, was an enormous success. Some 4,000 poets from across the Arab world sent in submissions to be considered. 35 were chosen for the show, and millions of viewers from across the Arab world tuned in to watch them recite their poetry, get criticized by Arab poetry’s answer to Simon Cowell, Paula Abdul and Randy Jackson (5 older poets and professors), improvise verses on the spot, and address wide-ranging issues from women’s rights, Iraq, love, democratization, Palestine and the old staple of Arab poetry: self-aggrandization. The winner would not only gain fame, but also a grand prize of 1,000,000 UAE Dirhams ($270,000).
The success of the show was wilder than anyone could’ve expected. The Arab press has had reports about how it has achieved the highest ratings in its spot, overtaking football matches and reality-TV; and millions have paid for text messages to vote for their favorite poet.
The turning point in the show’s popularity, many have speculated, came when young Palestinian poet, Tamim Al-Barghouti, read his poem "In Jerusalem". Tamim, who is a distant cousin and close friend of mine, is the son of famous Palestinian poet and writer Mourid Al-Barghouti (author of the excellent I Saw Ramallah) and Egyptian novelist Radwa Ashour. Tamim’s charisma, poetry, personality and politics captured the imagination of the Arab world. A veteran of years of student political activism in Palestine and Egypt, Tamim was once deported from Egypt by the authorities after engaging in one too many anti-Iraq War protests for the liking of Egypt’s regime. He then moved to America where he completed a Ph.D. in Political Science at Boston University in only three years, before working for the United Nations in Sudan. Through all of this, he has managed to publish four collections of poetry that have received critical acclaim and is expanding his Ph.D. thesis into a book on political identity in the Middle East to be published in 2008. He is now headed to Germany to become a fellow at the Berlin Institute for Advanced Study.
While many contestants opted away from talking about politics in their poems, hoping to not cause any grievance to the generous leaders of the United Arab Emirates who are hosting this show, or to any of the other Arab leaders, Tamim’s poetry was almost entirely political. Whether it was about Palestine, Iraq, or Arab dictatorships, Tamim was as courageous as he was eloquent, raising a few eyebrows in the quiet Emirate where discussing regional politics is not considered the wisest choice of discussion topic.
"In Jerusalem" is a poetic diary of Tamim’s last visit to his land’s occupied capital; a sad traverse through its occupied streets defiled by the occupation soldiers and the illegal settlers living on stolen Palestinian land, and around the apartheid walls choking the city with their racist denial of Palestinians’ basic freedoms and rights. Nonetheless, the poem ends on a cheery and optimistic tone, leading to the jubilant excitement with which the Arab world enjoyed the poem.
Palestinian newspapers have dubbed Tamim The Poet of Al-Aqsa; his posters hang on the streets of Jerusalem and other Palestinian cities, where key-chains are being sold with his picture on them. Sections of the poem have even become ring-tones blaring out from mobile phones across the Arab World, and 10-year-old kids compete in memorizing and reciting it. Hundreds of thousands of people have seen Tamim’s poems on Youtube and other video websites.
But perhaps Tamim’s most amazing feat was how he has galvanized all Palestinians into following him and supporting him. After all of the troubles that Palestine has been through recently, and all the divisions that have been spawned within the Palestinian people, it was very refreshing to finally find something that unequivocally unites all Palestinians, and rouses millions of Arabs behind the cause that was tarred recently by the actions of some Palestinians.
This unifying effect was most glaringly captured when the TV stations of both Hamas and Fatah threw their support behind the unsuspecting Tamim, broadcasting his poems repeatedly, and urging people to vote for him, catapulting him from a little known young poet into a symbol of national resistance and unity. Finally, after months of divisions amongst Palestinians, there was something uniting them: a reminder of the true essence of the cause of the Palestinians, of the real problem, the real enemies and the real need for unity to face these challenges for the sake of Palestinian people and their just cause.
All of which made the final result of the contest most surprising. After having consistently received the highest ranking from the viewers’ votes and the unanimous flattery of the judges, and after a barn-storming flawless last poem that had the judges gushing, Tamim ended up in fifth place out of the five finalists. The poetess that was expected to most strongly challenge Tamim, the Sudanese Rawda Al-Hajj, who had focused her poems on women’s empowerment, finished fourth. The winner, perhaps unsurprisingly, was Abdulkareem Maatouk, a poet from the host country, the United Arab Emirates, whose poems had steered clear of anything political or controversial.
Though Tamim refused to comment, speculation was rife that the results were rigged. That Tamim and Rawda, widely viewed as the two best poets, would finish bottom of the finalists was certainly implausible, and one could not help but imagine that politics came into play. Abu Dhabi may want to fashion itself as the capital of culture, but it probably values its political stability more than any cultural pretenses. Arab regimes may have behaved like warring tribes with narrow self-interest over the past century, but there is one thing in which their cooperation was always exemplary: the effective suppression of all voices of dissent. As the contest became more popular, and the crown of the Prince of Poets more prestigious, it may have become too hard for the organizers to accept giving the trophy to a Palestinian rabble-rouser who in one of his poems bemoaned the times that have “degraded the free amongst us, and made scoundrels into our rulers.”
Nonetheless, there is no doubt who the real winner was; it was not just Tamim and his poetry which will now rival Mahmoud Darwish’s as the voice of the Palestinians, but also the Palestinian people who were reminded of the meaning of their unity, and their cause, which has found its best advertisement that has strengthened the mutual affection, dedication and support of millions of Arabs in the midst of one of its darkest hours.
For more of my writings, see my blog The Saif House
Posted by Saifedean Ammous at 12:05 AM | Permalink





Comments
Sounds like a very bright and imaginative guy, but I bristle at the statement that Jerusalem is a Palestinian occupied city. When Jordan controlled it, were Israeli Jews allowed to go to their holy spots? And how did Jordan lose control? A war to wipe out Israel.
Posted by: fred lapides | Sep 10, 2007 8:42:10 AM
nice post Saif, thanks.
Posted by: morgan meis | Sep 10, 2007 12:22:43 PM
Saif,
Urdu poetry, like Arabic, retains a place in Pakistani (and Indian) culture which is incredibly vibrant and popular, and like you, I always have trouble explaining this. Not only are Urdu poets popular on their own, the best composers in the country set their poems to music (as Beethoven did for Schiller) and then the best singers sing the poems, so that it creates a merger of popular music and poetry. (Many poets also sing their own poems a capella, which can be a lovely thing.)
Your friend Tamim sounds amazing and is an amazingly charismatic performer of his own work. I only wish I understood Arabic so I knew what the hell he is saying!
Thanks much for this fascinating story. (And get me a Tamim keychain!!!)
Oh, and by the way, I saw this on another site:
It seems my blog is quickly deteriorating into a competition between me and myself to see who can link to more 3quarksdaily posts in a month, this one is just too good to miss.
This morning I saw a post there about a new television show in the Arab world.
This entire post was utterly amazing, and I read it the whole time with my jaw dropped, not because it surprises me that contrary to popular belief the Arab world is supremely cultured, but because it is just such good proof of that fact.
One of the things that always strikes me about Russia when I am there watching TV or going out is the relative ubiquity of poetry. I mean relative to America, of course, because even in Russia there are no televised poetry competitions. Certainly America has its share of song-crafting competitions (though most of these are about voice and not about lyrics) .
Ultimately I just wanted you to read 3quarks' post. It's worth it.
Good going, my friend!
Posted by: Abbas Raza | Sep 10, 2007 3:16:30 PM
Ah, but Tamim didn't win, he came fifth, behind a women's rights poetess. That says something about the less than overwhelming support for "fi Kuds" and the heavy political messages amongst the TV viewers. Why, in this post, do you refer to the city by its 3,000 year- old Israelite name, Jerusalem, when Tamim uses the Arab name, el Kuds?
What the Christians and Muslims in that city need is a set of leaders at the municipal level who are ready to work to improve services and housing conditions etc instead of always concentratig on nationalist politics and backing terrorism. I know you'll tell me that can't happen while the wicked Zionists are around to make all the rules, etc. You'd be wrong, it is the attention to details that makes the biggest difference.
Posted by: aguy109 | Sep 10, 2007 7:47:51 PM
Abbas and Morgan: thanks for your comments.
And of course we must have the regulation Zionut commenter show up to try to splurt whatever nonsense comes to their "brain" to try and divert any blame over anything away from Israel.
For the record, Aguy, small municipal miniscule changes can not and will not change anything, and they can not come about as long as the bigger picture is one of outright racism. However, I can fully understand why it is extremely convenient for a defender of apartheid like yourself to spout such airy-fairy claptrap; it might help in diverting blame away from Israel for its racist policies and placing it instead on some meaningless concept of "lack of cooperation on a local level" that absolves everyone from blame. It would work, if only everyone was stupid enough to believe this.
Apartheid was not ended in South Africa by having white and black municipal council members agreeing on how to collect trash effectively. Trash was collected effectively when apartheid was ended and whites and blacks could vote like equal human beings to decide how garbage can be collected.
With Israel's racist policies in Jerusalem, there is simply no prospect for this city ever being anything but a disgusting ghetto of seclusion, racism and apartheid. But we also know very well from history what happens to racist ghettos of seclusion and apartheid: they fall. Resoundingly. The only thing that remains from them is the eternal shame of anyone like yourself who had the temerity to defend them. I just hope that you live to see the day your grandchildren feel really ashamed of telling their friends that you were actually a defender of Zionist apartheid.
For a fascinating account of apartheid in Jerusalem, please see:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1703245,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1704037,00.html
Posted by: Saifedean | Sep 10, 2007 8:05:22 PM
Mr Ammous,
On this very morning, 65 Israeli soldiers were wounded when a rocket fired from un-occupied Gaza hit an IDF training base. 30 of them were 18 year old women. In response, Israel bombed Beit Lahiha, killing at least two children and causing much damage. Now, we hope we didn't upset your breakfast table in New York with all our racket.
At the end of your (actually very interesting, except for the blind hatred parts and knee-jerk use of the word "racism") piece, you refer us to your blog. I took you up on the offer and found this: "So in case you happen to stumble here, expect to find a lot of angry ramblings and venomous rants with liberal use of bad language about the most disgusting things in life, like stupidity, war, racism, and Zionism (forgive the redundancy)."
How imaginative, sir. Perhaps you should enter the poetry competition yourself after displaying such eloquence (and let's not forget that brilliant pun - "Zionut". I would text message my vote for you in an instant).
But over here, people are actually getting killed.
Your blind, irrational hatred will not help us (Israelis or Palestinians) stop sheding each others blood. Denying Israel's historical ties to Jerusalem is ridiculous. Denying Palestinian rights to Jerusalem is just as bad. We should reach a common resolution for partitioning the city, and making it a symbol of inter faith co-operation and good will. Your automatic hatred and really childish name calling will only lead to more and more blood shed. Enough.
Posted by: dkmy | Sep 11, 2007 1:41:46 AM
I never cease to be amazed by the collossal stupidity of the argument that dkmy recycles to us here.
Suddenly, the only thing wrong in Palestine/Israel is that Saif, living in NY, uses some nasty words to accurately describe nasty things. If only he would not call racists racists, then everything will be dandy.
By this moronic "logic", the problem in South Africa was not in apartheid, but in opponents of apartheid calling apartheid "Racist" which I assume dkmy would find unhelpful. Similarly, the only thing wrong in the American south in the 50's was in the Civil Rights movement calling segregation racist. Not the segregation itself.
It is very convenient for you to come here and cry crocodile tears and act like the compassionate voice seeking understanding, ignoring that you are a racist, you support a racist criminal regime that has been persecuting Palestinians for 60 years, and trying to divert attention from this by pretending that the problem is that Saif dares to call a racist a racist, and that he uses harsh words.
If you disagree with anyone calling Israel's actions criminal or racist, please try to act like an adult, and offer some substantial arguments as to why you think this is inaccurate. If not, then please stop acting like a 7-year-old child walking into a poker club and getting offended at the coarse language.
The problem is not that I or Saif call the Israeli government criminals and racists, the problem is that they ARE criminals and racists. Now if you actually are racist enough not to see this yourself, please try to argue against it and stop pretending that the only thing preventing peace from taking hold is Saif's liberal use of accurate adjectives.
As for the violence over which you pretend to shed tears, I will say this: I hate to see this happen more than you claim you do. I oppose all violence and would only approve of peaceful means of resistance. The difference between you and me is that you want security to come while Israel maintains its racist control over the lives of millions of Palestinians, while I want the security to come through a real, just and comprehensive peace, where all humans can live together equally, without any criminal and racist armies suppressing people because of whatever religions they were born into.
But I am sure it is much more convenient for you to avoid discussing these issues, and so I fully expect you to return to attacking Saif's language instead.
Posted by: StevieG | Sep 11, 2007 2:06:53 AM
Arab will lead the world again with their Islam :)
Posted by: Arab | Sep 11, 2007 2:30:22 AM
Wicked use of terminology by Zionists trying to maneuver the reality in occupied Falastine.
Too many short sentences used in this blog to spread new terminologies worldwide.
The IDF training camp is not a dining hall, nor a summer camp.
It is an actual military training camp called Zikkim base near Ashkelon. The 69 "military soldiers" were injured; most of them were rushed to the hospitals due to the panic caused by the rockets.
The military base is one kilometer from Gaza strip and "is" used to launch aggression and massacres against Palestinian civilians; and if memory serves all who are monitoring the news in Falastine, they could all remember Gaza's beach massacre and the murder of Abu Ghazaleh's family committed by IDF troops in this base.
The un-occupied term is a classic example of stupidity; occupation of Gaza never ended with Sharon, Gaza is still occupied just like other Palestinian territories who were given some political authorities only to protect Zionists' security.
The Zionist government has control over all access to Gaza strip and to its electricity and water supplies.
For God's sake, they are planning a military attack against the civilians in Gaza within this month as a clear message to the peace conference that Mr. Bush had called for!
The only thing that I agree with this fact-twisting racist dkmy is that yes, people are dying here; but they are all Palestinians!
I really hope that I've managed to upset your day!
Posted by: Rabbi | Sep 11, 2007 5:19:46 PM
Tammim is lucky to have a cousin as eloquent as you, Saifedean, to write a beautiful post like this one about him.
Our homelands will be free, from the Tigris River to the Sea.
Posted by: Saja | Sep 14, 2007 12:06:26 PM
Thank you very much for noticing that! I enjoy this blog immensely.
Posted by: Lally | Sep 14, 2007 9:51:45 PM
Saif, you're my hero! Looking forward to your first book! =)
Posted by: Sa'ed | Sep 15, 2007 5:28:52 PM
I haven't read such an interesting article in a very long time ... thanx alot Saif ... keep up the good work, you have an amazing style in writing, look forward to your next article :)
Posted by: Farah.I | Sep 17, 2007 3:43:34 AM
Wonderful post... Tamim's poems are great as well, thanks for turning me on to him and to the "Prince of Poets" phenomenon. And yes, the usual idiots will try to find a reason to unload their terrible, unbearable, burden - to defend Zionism in the face of humanism - by attacking your fine writing... Clearly, Palestinians may have lost their country, but they are princes of poetry.
Posted by: KR | Sep 18, 2007 4:51:26 PM
Post a comment