September 06, 2007
Richard Serra at MoMA
Nicolaus Mills in Dissent:

BEFORE THE MUSEUM of Modern Art’s new building opened in 2004, the late Kirk Varnedoe, MoMA’s chief curator of painting and sculpture, asked design architect Yoshio Taniguchi to make sure that the museum’s 20,000 square feet of open space on its second floor was reinforced so that it could accommodate large-scale work. The MoMA’s retrospective, “Richard Serra Sculpture: Forty Years,” which contains over 550 tons of steel sculptures on the second floor alone, shows how prescient Varnedoe was.
Like so many contemporary artists whose work is monumental, Serra’s seems perfect for an outdoor show. Site-specific work by him has thrived in locations as different as Storm King Art Center in upstate New York and North Island, New Zealand. But these days Serra is not out to create sculpture that can be looked at as a visual object. He has instead given himself over to his longstanding concern with relationship between a work of art and the person viewing it. His interest is in the process of seeing, not the process of representation.
In a June interview with Charlie Rose, Serra explained the consequences of his concern. Contrasting experiencing his work with that of viewing traditional sculpture, Serra explained that “you’re the subject matter...You’re in the volume of these pieces, and they either spin you out from one to the other, or make a continuous movement throughout. But the subject matter of that experience is yours. So you’re the content. And that’s a shift. That’s a shift from twentieth-century sculpture.”
Posted by Robin Varghese at 12:46 PM | Permalink










Comments
Fans of Serra's work might find the linked image which I captured recently at MOMA of interest.
Click on my name to view.
Posted by: Tony C. | Sep 6, 2007 1:10:06 PM
Nice shot, Tony C.
Posted by: Shabbir | Sep 6, 2007 4:51:03 PM
To call it prescient as opposed to common-sense planning is odd. He asked the architect for a huge room so of course you'd expect to put huge, heavy things in it.
Moreover, let's "do the math." Assuming Dissent is accurate (and I have no idea either way) you have 550 tons spread over 20,000 square feet. That's 55 pounds per square foot additional load. Doesn't sound like that much.
Of course I'd like to hear a structural engineer's take; maybe there are some subtleties. How much did MOMA reinforce the floor above-and-beyond what the Building Code requires for this sort of public space? Or is it just PT Barnum hype?
Posted by: David Sucher | Sep 6, 2007 11:12:15 PM
Post a comment