| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« HIV triggers the 'opposite of cancer' in the brain | Main | Another side of the story »

August 16, 2007

under the control of a clearly crazy author

070820_r16504_p233

But Dick has also become for our time what Edgar Allan Poe was for Gilded Age America: the doomed genius who supplies a style of horrors and frissons. (In both cases, it took the French to see it; the first good critical writing on Dick, as on Poe, came from Europe, and particularly from Paris.) Like Poe’s, Dick’s last big book was a work of cosmic explanation in which lightning bolts of brilliance flash over salty oceans of insanity. Poe’s explanation of everything was called “Eureka.” Dick’s was “VALIS.” The second, literary Dick is now in the Library of America ($35), under the excellent editorial care of Jonathan Lethem, a passionate devotee, who also provides an abbreviated chronology of Dick’s tormented life. Four of the sixties novels are neatly packed together in the handsome black covers: “The Man in the High Castle,” “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch,” “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” (the original of “Blade Runner”), and his masterpiece, “Ubik.”

Dick’s fans are not modest in their claims. Nor are they especially precise: Borges, Calvino, Kafka, Robertson Davies are cited, in the blurbs and introductions, as his peers. A note of inconsistency inflects these claims—Calvino and Robertson Davies?—but they are sincerely made and, despite all those movies and all that praise, have a slight, useful tang of hyperbolic defensiveness.

more from The New Yorker here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 05:25 AM | Permalink

Comments

Dick is like the Stevie Wonder of literature: everybody steals from him.

Posted by: beajerry | Aug 16, 2007 8:37:12 AM

[He] felt repelled by the teaching machines. For the entire public school was geared to a task that went contrary to his grain: the school was not there to inform or educate, but to mold, and along severely limited lines. It was the link to their inherited culture, and it peddled that culture, in its entirety, to the young. It bent its pupils to it; perpetuation of the culture was the goal, and any special quirks in the children which might lead them in another direction had to be ironed out.

That sounds pretty clear to me. Is it any wonder that the group of snobs who run the New Yorker, Gopnick chief among them, would try and do a cheap and easy take down of a man dead 25 years? If there's one thing that is not tolerated in this country it's a genuine subversive, and that's what PKD was. To attack his language is pointless though, and that's the weak spot in Gopnick's argument. You can't separate the ideas from the language used to convey those ideas. And as far as how PKD wrote, in great spurts, impelled by economic and familial pressures, well, that seems very petty coming from a writer who shuttles back and forth between New York and Paris and then passes off his diary scribbles about where he went and what he had to eat as revised, sculpted, tortured prose.

Posted by: Ken Ehrlich | Aug 16, 2007 12:27:19 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Bill on zizek does iran

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J. Hawkins on Wednesday Poem

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Carlos on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

J. Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Eli on Wednesday Poem

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

JonJ on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

David Schneider on zizek does iran

Martine on Friday Poem

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

aguy109 on Vocal Minority Insists It Was All Smoke and Mirrors

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J.Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J.Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

mary on Happy Bastille Day

Dr.R.P.Sehgal on India, China and the polemics of the East


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed