| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Perceptions: juxtaposed realities | Main | My Mother's Secret Travel Diaries »

August 27, 2007

The 3qd U.S. Open Preview

How good are the tennis players competing in the U.S. Open, which starts today?  Consider these names: Frank Dancevic, the Canadian number one, who beat Andy Roddick three weeks ago; Aisam-ul-haq Qureshi, the Pakistani number one, who played Marat Safin at Wimbledon this year; Israeli number one Dudi Sela; and Japanese number one Takao Suzuki, who last October came within four points last fall of defeating Roger Federer. What do these players have in common?  They weren't good enough to be guaranteed spots in the draw.  All of them played in last week's qualifying tournament, in which 128 men and 128 women compete to fill the final 16 places in the men's and women's draws.

I watched Qureshi play two qualifying matches last week, the second against Scoville Jenkins, an African-American player who has given Rafael Nadal a difficult match in the past.  The level of play was nearly indistinguishable from that of the best players - after all, even Federer and Nadal, who dominate their peers like no other duo in history, only win 55% of their points played.  Qureshi is an exciting player who forces the action by coming to net after every serve, but after winning a dramatic first set in a tiebreaker, he injured his wrist in the second and retired, ending his hopes to qualify for the main draw.  Jenkins' reward for qualifying?  To face Federer in the first round.  On outer courts this week, you'll see the stylish Dancevic as well as many more familiar names.  In Arthur Ashe and Louis Armstrong stadiums, where tennis' upper crust perform their magic, court-side tickets are very difficult to obtain, so it can be hard to see human drama that is so palpable when sitting a few feet from a player. 

Tennis is a sport afflicted by its white-shoe image.  Investment advisers, insurance companies, and gold watchmakers lavishly sponsor the sport,  but it's a case of very unequal revenue sharing.  Players outside the top fifty make much less than comparably ranked athletes in other sports, and the Jenkins' and Sela's of the tour scrape to pay for flights, hotels and coaches, despite the relative closeness of their abilities to the best.  Marketers have tried to inflate professional tennis into a kind of upper-middlebrow fashion show, yet beneath this lies a rigorous sport that demands the discipline, dexterity, and intense focus of a concert violinist. 

If you do get great seats at Arthur Ashe stadium, though, these skills will be displayed quite fully.  Last Thursday afternoon, Roger Federer, practiced there.  With an audience of about five security guards and your excited correspondent, media badge nervously clutched, in the empty 22,000-seat arena, Federer goofed around between points against Germany's Nicolas Kiefer, then proceeded to hit his stunning and flawless strokes.  Seen at close range, I can perhaps best describe his play as explosively graceful, or violently precise.  He wasn't very focussed, though, missing some shots and laughing, "Nein!"  (Federer tends to exposulate in different langauges, using "Allez!" for the French, and "Come on!" in Queens.)  At one point, Kiefer aced him, and Federer, without looking, smashed the ball off the tarp behind him, neatly banking it into the hands of a waiting hitting partner.  It was the kind of thing you might see a magician do, yet for Federer it was just an absent-minded expression of annoyance.  Such is life as the greatest practitioner ever of tennis.

Rafa Nadal, meanwhile, was literally waiting in the wings for his own practice session with the former world number one Juan Carlos Fererro.  But Federer didn't clear out of his chair, continuing to laugh and joke with Kiefer.  Finally, Nadal, whose eagerness to hit tennis balls is infinite and joyous, walked out onto the court.  At this Federer stood began to pack up his bag, with his back turned to his greatest rival - perhaps a subtle psychological tactic?  Not to be ignored, however, Rafa playfully tapped Roger on the calf with his racquet as he passed, to which Federer brightly responded, "Hey Raf!," and left Nadal to perform his own tricks.

The U.S. Open starts today.  The schedule is here.  A grounds pass is $45.00, and gains you admission to every court other than Ashe.  Take the 7 train to Willets Point-Shea Stadium and follow the devotees.

(For more of my 3quarks tennis writing, click here, here, here, or here.)

Posted by Asad Raza at 12:09 AM | Permalink

Comments

"...the greatest practitioner ever of tennis."

Is that indeed what people are saying?

Posted by: David Sucher | Aug 27, 2007 1:03:13 AM

Yes, David, it is. Federer is on a run of dominance since 2003 that has never been seen in the professional era: he's won the last five Wimbledons, the last three U.S. Opens, three of the last four Australian Opens, and made the final of the last two French Opens.

He has far surpassed Agassi, Lendl, McEnroe, Connors, and Becker. The only players who are arguably close are Laver, Sampras, and Borg.

Posted by: Asad Raza | Aug 27, 2007 11:23:50 AM

It was a pleasure to read your views on players, esp on Qureshi who i recently started following anxiously. I know i sound like a patriot, cause he is the only one representing Pakistan at this level. It is a fantastic game and i wish more Pakistanis can consider it for professional reasons rather than playing it for hobby / past time.

Posted by: Ali Hafeez Azmat | Aug 27, 2007 11:28:53 AM

Don't be ashamed of your patriotism - Qureshi is the best-ever Pakistani player, and that's exciting. Plus he serves and volleys, a lost art that is a joy to observe.

Posted by: Asad Raza | Aug 27, 2007 11:39:42 AM

The relative compensation of tennis practioners is something I know nothing about. How does it compare to golf?

Where can one get statistics on this?

Posted by: Hektor Bim | Aug 27, 2007 1:56:06 PM

Here is the 2007 PGA Tour Money Leaders List:
http://www.pgatour.com/r/stats/current/109.html

Here is the 2007 ATP Money Leaders List:
http://www.tennis.com/rankings/money_men.aspx?id=2110

As one can see, the #6 player on ATP earnings list is under $1million; whereas, for golf you have to down to player #80 to find someone earning below $1million.

I would imagine that the reason for the huge disparity here is because golf is far more popular in America than tennis.


Asad, you say that tennis suffers from a "white-shoe image" and that this needs to be corrected but, then you go on to compare a tennis player to a "concert violinist."
Probably not the best analogy to be making if one is trying to give tennis a grittier image, in my opinion.

Posted by: Omar | Aug 27, 2007 4:02:23 PM

Omar, you got me. Good point. I should have said that tennis is as tough as boxing but with the dexterity of the violin virtuoso.

Golf. Arggh.

Posted by: Asad Raza | Aug 27, 2007 5:01:02 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Ken Pidcock on The need for critical science journalism

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed