| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Becoming Shakespeare: The Unlikely Afterlife That Turned a Provincial Playwright Into the Bard | Main | Early Responses the John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt's The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy »

August 29, 2007

Sorting Out the Genome

To put your genes in order, flip them like pancakes.

Brian Hayes in American Scientist:

Fullimage_200782114412_846All through the 1930s, members of the famous Drosophila group at Caltech roamed the American West collecting fruit flies for genetic analysis. One discovery to come from these expeditions was an abundance of genetic inversions: blocks of genes that had flipped end-over-end. Flies from one geographic region might have a certain set of genes in the order a b c d e f g, but a population elsewhere could harbor the sequence d c b a e f g, with the first four genes inverted. A further reversal, affecting a different block of genes, could produce an ordering such as d c f e a b g. Theodosius Dobzhansky and Alfred H. Sturtevant, two of the leading Drosophilists,pointed out that such genetic rearrangements could help in reconstructing the family tree of the flies. More reversals would indicate greater evolutionary distance.

The variations discovered by Dobzhansky and Sturtevant could be explained by reversing just one or two blocks of genes. Later, when gene order was studied in a broader range of organisms, more complex patterns emerged. In the 1980s Jeffrey D. Palmer and Laura A. Herbon of the University of Michigan were measuring the pace of evolutionary change in plants of the cabbage family. Looking at the DNA in mitochondria (the energy-producing organelles), they found that the genes had been jumbled by multiple random reversals. Transforming cabbage into turnip took at least three reversals. More distant relatives such as cabbage and mustard appeared to be separated by a dozen or more reversal events—they could only estimate how many.

If these genetic flip-flops are to serve as an evolutionary clock, we need a reliable way to count them. Given two arrangements of a set of genes—say a b c d e f g and f e b a g c d—how do you determine what sequence of reversals produced the transformation? This example has a three-step solution, which you can probably find in a few minutes with pencil and paper. For larger genomes and longer chains of reversals, however, trial-and-error methods soon falter. Is there an efficient algorithm for identifying a sequence of reversals that converts one permutation into another?

The genetic reversal problem lies at the intersection of biology, mathematics and computer science. For some time, the prospects for finding a simple and efficient solution seemed dim, even with the most powerful tools of all three disciplines. But the story has a happy ending. A little more than a decade ago, computing gene reversals was still a subtle research problem; now it can be done with such ease that it's a matter of routine technology. If you need to know the "reversal distance" between two genomes, you can go to a Web site and get the answer in seconds.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:54 PM | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed

Help 3 Quarks Daily

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD ADVERTISING



Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Please Visit Wikio

  • Wikio
  • Wikio Shopping
  • LCD Monitor
  • LCD TV
  • Recent Comments

    Danny Bloom on Words of Warming

    Carlos on The Danger of Stress

    Elatia Harris on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    Felix E F Larocca MD on The Danger of Stress

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    David Sucher on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    Elatia Harris on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    bill on Tuesday Poem

    Elatia Harris on the spy cook

    reader on humans helping computers

    GHills on Words of Warming

    John Ballard on The Danger of Stress

    Wade Nichols on the spy cook

    Jonathan on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    David Sucher on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    scripto on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    Richard on Tricky Dick's Legacy: A Review of Rick Perlstein's "Nixonland"

    Wade Nichols on Is Jon Stewart the Most Trusted Man in America?

    missvolare on Words of Warming

    Richard Phillipps on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    PD Smith on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    Jon on Can science survive George Bush?

    David Sucher on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    MattInOz on Words of Warming

    Felix E F Larocca MD on zizek on haiti

    Acclaim For 3QD


    Best Non-European Weblog Winner


    Best Group Blog and Blog Most Deserving of Wider Attention Finalist


    Wikio - Top Blogs

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed