| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« James Kelman on His Early Days As a Writer | Main | the pickle dealer »

August 11, 2007

Raul Hilberg & The Distance of Victims

Gustav Seibt on the great Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg, who died last week (originally in Süddeutsche Zeitung, trans in signandsight.com).

Hilberg2

When Hilberg's main work, "The Destruction of the European Jews," came out in the USA in 1961, practically no one recognised its importance. It seemed to be a history in which the victims had no face and the perpetrators no physiognomy. No one, not even even astute contemporaries like Hannah Arendt, recognised that precisely these two characteristics - the distance of the victims and the intangibility of the perpetrators - were essential conditions of the historical process of the extermination of the Jews.

In Germany, similarly, Hilberg's achievement initially met with little response. German historical writing had concentrated on the spectral leaders of the Third Reich, to whom it attributed superhuman powers in pushing through their saturnine goals. These goals were then precisely ordered in terms of the history of ideologies. In this context, analyses of the network-like, multi-polar structure of modern management practices were of no interest. On the side of the victims, equally, Hilberg met with bitter criticism for his rather casual treatment of their resistance. Until today, "The Destruction of the European Jews" has not been published in Israel.

Consequently it took an incredible twenty years before Hilberg's work - which had been consistently brought up to date - was brought out in German, the language in which the vast majority of its sources were written. The small publisher promptly ruined itself in the process. And an additional twenty years had to pass before its author was honoured in Germany with two prizes and an order of merit.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 04:41 PM | Permalink

Comments

And now for the critical take on Raul Hilberg. Robert Faurisson writes:

The prosecution expert in the first trial was Raul Hilberg, an American professor of Jewish descent and author of the standard reference work, The Destruction of the European Jews (1961), which Paul Rassinier discussed in Le Drame des Juifs européens (The Drama of the European Jews). Hilberg began his testimony by explaining, without interruption, his theory about the extermination of the Jews. He was then cross-examined by Zündel's lawyer, Douglas Christie, who was assisted by Keltie Zubko and myself. Right from the start it was clear that Hilberg, who was the world's leading authority on the Holocaust, had never examined a single concentration camp, not even Auschwitz. He had still not examined any camp in 1985 when he announced the imminent appearance of a new edition of his main work in three volumes, revised, corrected and augmented. Although he did visit Auschwitz in 1979 for a single day as part of a ceremonial appearance, he did not bother to examine either the buildings or the archives. In his entire life he has never seen a "gas chamber," either in its original condition or in ruins. (For a historian, even ruins can tell tales). On the stand he was forced to admit that there had never been a plan, a central organization, a budget or supervision for what he called the policy of the extermination of the Jews. He also had to admit that since 1945 the Allies have never carried out an expert study of "the weapon of the crime," that is to say of a homicidal gas chamber. No autopsy report has established that even one inmate was ever killed by poison gas.

Hilberg said that Hitler gave orders for the extermination of the Jews, and that Himmler gave an order to halt the extermination on November 25, 1944 (such detail!). But Hilberg could not produce these orders. The defense asked him if he still maintained the existence of the Hitler orders in the new edition of his book. He dared to answer yes. He thereby lied and even committed perjury. In the new edition of his work (with a preface dated September 1984),

Hilberg systematically deleted any mention of an order by Hitler. (In this regard, see the review by Christopher Browning, "The Revised Hilberg," Simon Wiesenthal Center Annual, 1986, p. 294). When he was asked by the defense to explain how the Germans had been able to carry out an undertaking as enormous as the extermination of millions of Jews without any kind of plan, without any central agency, without any blueprint or budget, Hilberg replied that in the various Nazi agencies there had been "an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind-reading by a far-flung bureaucracy."

source:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p417_Faurisson.html

Posted by: HilbergCritic | Aug 11, 2007 5:51:00 PM

OH Jesus Christ!!!!! HilbergCritic, Ugh!

Posted by: Robin | Aug 11, 2007 6:02:12 PM

Along with other commenters, I have said this before, but here's a good opportunity to say it again. Writing anonymous comments filled with speculations such as one of those above -- that "No autopsy report has established that even one inmate [of Auschwitz] was ever killed by poison gas" -- seems not just anti-historical but craven. While it's very hard to tell if the person calling himself "HilbergCritic" seeks merely to offend, or deludes himself that clarity and persuasion are on his side, one thing is certain -- choosing anonymity makes a writer living in a fastness of ignorance look frightened of a reality test, and that's not the kind of writer I want to bother with.

Whenever there is a comment longer than a few lines posted by a writer I don't know, and I begin to get that telltale feeling I'm wasting my time, I check for a provenance. And if I don't see that a person who chooses to be real is putting in his two cents' worth, then I move on. It's better than wishing I had.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Aug 11, 2007 6:43:34 PM

To the “HilbergCritic”- I never met Raul Hilberg and obviously, I never will, but I have met Ernest Zundel. It was back in 1975 at a psychic fair (what I was doing there is story for another time). He was flogging his latest book, “UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapons?” For those unfamiliar with this piece of scholarship; its central thesis maintains that a select group of Nazi scientists and party faithful are still alive and running a secret base of operations deep inside a gigantic underground cavern at the South Pole.
The proceeds from the sale of this book were used to fund his publishing house and promote his holocaust denial work. Maybe Raul Hilberg only visited Auschwitz once but I know for a fact that Zundel has never set foot in Antarctica.

P.S.- I didn't buy a copy Zundel's UFO book. Part of me regrets that; I do love crackpot theories. The better part of me has no regrets whatsoever. I was a no sale for Mr. Zundel that day.

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Aug 11, 2007 10:06:23 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Our Science Prize

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Hamid on Abandon all hope, ye who enter this thread

Rebekah on Only Philosophers Go to Hell

Adrian Morgan on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Ruchira on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Ruchira on Just Herself

matt on Friday Poem

Stefan on Questioning Willusionism

Saba R. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Faisal K. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

Anand Manikutty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Sandra on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

DAS on Questioning Willusionism

Raza on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

DAS on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

John Ballard on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

Chris Gudmann on How Bad Is It?

Cormac O Rafferty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

ajith on Science is Not About Certainty: A Philosophy of Physics

Ralston McTodd on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed