| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Lunar Refractions: I’ve Gone to Look for America | Main | Indian Food Made Easy »

August 07, 2007

In Dusty Archives, a Theory of Affluence

From The New York Times:

Rich For thousands of years, most people on earth lived in abject poverty, first as hunters and gatherers, then as peasants or laborers. But with the Industrial Revolution, some societies traded this ancient poverty for amazing affluence.

Historians and economists have long struggled to understand how this transition occurred and why it took place only in some countries. A scholar who has spent the last 20 years scanning medieval English archives has now emerged with startling answers for both questions. Gregory Clark, an economic historian at the University of California, Davis, believes that the Industrial Revolution — the surge in economic growth that occurred first in England around 1800 — occurred because of a change in the nature of the human population. The change was one in which people gradually developed the strange new behaviors required to make a modern economy work. The middle-class values of nonviolence, literacy, long working hours and a willingness to save emerged only recently in human history, Dr. Clark argues. Because they grew more common in the centuries before 1800, whether by cultural transmission or evolutionary adaptation, the English population at last became productive enough to escape from poverty, followed quickly by other countries with the same long agrarian past.

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 07:00 AM | Permalink

Comments

Uh oh. One of the main thrusts of the article is that the greatest leap of progress ever made in human history was caused by the wealthy and educated successfully reproducing, with the poor and uneducated not successfully reproducing.

See the contrast with today?

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Aug 7, 2007 1:29:23 PM

Its amazing the lengths apologists will go to, outrunning the harsh reality of Marx.

Posted by: Trotsky | Aug 7, 2007 2:56:57 PM

When an economic historian starts dabbling in "cultural transmission or evolutionary adaptation" he is bound to end up with sub-Lamarkian egg on his face.
What, people in Roman times didn’t seek literacy, save money or work long hours? This post is crap. Everyone alive today has seen how new technologies, like computers and cellular phones, can spread like wildfire and transform our lives. The same thing was true of Watt's steam engine and other technologies that generated the Industrial Revolution. It’s the accepted explanation, and it’s the right one.

Posted by: aguy109 | Aug 7, 2007 6:42:41 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Mike Cope on Thursday Poem

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Christopher on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Winfield J. Abbe on Walter Isaacson on Einstein

Louise Gordon on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Dave Ranning on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Carlos on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

J. Hawkins on The Tipping Point Theory of Racial Segregation: Fascinating but Mythological?

DavidG on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Elatia Harris on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

J. Hawkins on Vatican embraces Oscar Wilde

billy on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Ken Pidcock on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd

Vicki Baker on The Folly of Pretense: Dennett on the "I'm an atheist but..." Crowd


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed