| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Jewel of the Jungle | Main | heidegger's hut »

July 17, 2007

In Princes’ Pockets

Tariq Ali in the London Review of Books:

Screenhunter_15_jul_17_2149The day after the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, a Saudi woman resident in London, a member of a wealthy family, rang her sister in Riyadh to discuss the crisis affecting the kingdom. Her niece answered the phone.

‘Where’s your mother?’

‘She’s here, dearest aunt, and I’ll get her in a minute, but is that all you have to say to me? No congratulations for yesterday?’

The dearest aunt, out of the country for far too long, was taken aback. She should not have been. The fervour that didn’t dare show itself in public was strong even at the upper levels of Saudi society. US intelligence agencies engaged in routine surveillance were, to their immense surprise, picking up unguarded cellphone talk in which excited Saudi princelings were heard revelling in bin Laden’s latest caper. Like the CIA, they had not thought it possible for him to reach such heights.

Washington had taken its oldest ally in the Arab world for granted. In the weeks that followed 9/11, the Saudi royal family was besieged by a storm of critical comment in the US media and its global subsidiaries. Publishers eager to make a quick dollar hurriedly produced a few bad books with even worse titles – Hatred’s Kingdom, Sleeping with the Devil – that set out to denounce the Saudis. The mini-industry had little medium-term impact, and normal business was soon resumed. On 14 February 2005 there was even a re-enactment of the meeting that had taken place sixty years before on the USS Quincy, moored in the Suez Canal, at which Roosevelt and Ibn Saud, the first king of Saudi Arabia, signed the concordat that would guarantee continued single-family rule. The interpreter was Colonel William Eddy, a senior US intelligence officer and much else besides. Considered too insecure during the ‘global war on terror’, Suez was rejected as a potential venue for the re-enactment: the grandsons of the two principals and Eddy’s nephew had to make do with the Ritz in Coconut Grove, Florida. A giant gold-plated Cadillac in the Arizona desert might have been more appropriate.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 09:51 PM | Permalink

Comments

This is a good article and explains well why it is so horrendous to watch the Bush family and their hangers-on kiss up to the Saudis.

A minor detail: Arguably, Morocco is the oldest ally of the US in the Arab world. They recognized the US during the revolutionary war, supported the Union during the Civil War, etc. Their friendship with the US is as long as France's.

Posted by: Hektor Bim | Jul 18, 2007 9:18:37 AM

How could ARAMCO have Pakistani workers in camps in 1944. Pakistan didnt come into existence until Aug 14 1947. Is this a typo?

<>

Posted by: Robin Khundkar | Jul 18, 2007 12:38:47 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed

Help 3 Quarks Daily

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD ADVERTISING



Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Please Visit Wikio

  • Wikio
  • Wikio Shopping
  • LCD Monitor
  • LCD TV
  • Recent Comments

    Danny Bloom on Words of Warming

    Carlos on The Danger of Stress

    Elatia Harris on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    Felix E F Larocca MD on The Danger of Stress

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    David Sucher on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    Elatia Harris on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    bill on Tuesday Poem

    Elatia Harris on the spy cook

    reader on humans helping computers

    GHills on Words of Warming

    John Ballard on The Danger of Stress

    Wade Nichols on the spy cook

    Jonathan on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    David Sucher on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    scripto on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    Richard on Tricky Dick's Legacy: A Review of Rick Perlstein's "Nixonland"

    Wade Nichols on Is Jon Stewart the Most Trusted Man in America?

    missvolare on Words of Warming

    Richard Phillipps on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    PD Smith on Steve Fuller's Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution

    Jon on Can science survive George Bush?

    David Sucher on Reading the 92nd Street Y Catalog: Sephardim and Arabs Need Not Apply

    MattInOz on Words of Warming

    Felix E F Larocca MD on zizek on haiti

    Acclaim For 3QD


    Best Non-European Weblog Winner


    Best Group Blog and Blog Most Deserving of Wider Attention Finalist


    Wikio - Top Blogs

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed