June 28, 2007
Bye, Bye, Miss American Empire
From Orion Magazine:
In the wake of George W. Bush’s re-election in 2004, frustrated liberals talked secession back to within hailing distance of the margins of national debate—a place it had not occupied since 1861. With their praise of self-rule and the devolution of power, they sounded not unlike many conservatives had in the days before Bush & Cheney & Limbaugh wedded the American Right to the American Empire. While certain proponents of the renascent secessionism were motivated by spite or pixilated by whimsy or driven by the simple-minded belief that the United States can be divided into blue and red—as though our lovely land can be painted in only two hues!—others argued with cogency and passion for a disunionist position that bordered on the, well, seditious. Emphasizing both culture ("Now that slavery is taken care of, I’m for letting the South form its own nation,” said Democratic operative Bob Beckel) and economics (Democratic pundit Lawrence O’Donnell noted that “ninety percent of the red states are welfare clients of the federal government"), writing in forums of neoliberalism (Slate) and paleoliberalism (The Nation), liberals helped to disinter a body of thought that had been buried at Appomattox. And—surprise!—three years later, the corpse has legs.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 07:09 AM | Permalink











Comments
Hey, when I lived in Oregon in the 60s we talked about taking that state, Washington, and Northern California out of the U.S. (and maybe joining Canada). And Philadelphians are certainly ready to secede from Pennsylvania (too bad Pittsburg is on the other side of the state, so it would be hard for them to join).
But I would say that the blue states shouldn't secede from the red states; they should re-conquer them. It obviously didn't take too well the first time. (Just kidding, of course.)
Posted by: JonJ | Jun 28, 2007 9:40:16 PM
Sorry, "Pittsburgh."
Posted by: JonJ | Jun 28, 2007 9:41:34 PM
Post a comment