May 07, 2007
Below the Fold: Pedophilia – The Avatars of Evil and Me
Nobody loves a pedophile. No one. Not even their mothers.
American society prefers them dead – done in by fellow inmates incarcerated in some human inferno of a prison. If that doesn’t work, it’s perpetual ankle bracelets or indefinite incarceration. Out of shackles and out of prison, a registry of their names is kept, their houses noted, their neighbors notified.
I knew some pedophiles, or presumptive pedophiles, when I was 15. They are likely dead now, as the events I describe here happened forty years ago. I was a lonely, depressed gay kid. I knew what a homosexual was because my parents, to their embarrassment, took me to Gore Vidal’s play, The Best Man, in 1960. The play is Washington-based melodrama in which a presidential candidate’s homosexual past becomes a weapon used in blackmail against him. Though I never used the word, I knew what it meant all the same. I knew I was a homosexual too, but I only told it to myself. Moreover, to escape imagined annihilation at the hands of the male heterosexual mob, I worked hard to leave no traces of my true identity in any part of the world I inhabited.
Well, I suppose, almost. I found a sympathetic listener in my drama teacher. He was a remarkably self-assured man of about 45, I would guess. I might even say he was flamboyant, given that flamboyant in a drab suburban high school in 1963 meant dressing a couple notches above Robert Hall’s, wearing fashionable glasses, and using a very fine fountain pen instead of a cheap Papermate. He walked on his heels with his head held high. He had a wonderfully full voice, and yes, a high-pitched bit of a cackle. When he got mad, whether in class or in a rehearsal, he would slam the papers or the clipboard down, and walk away rather than at us, which I find all the more remarkable now having realized how many bullies I have faced in classrooms. He was a passionate man, full of spirit. You never would have known that he had gone to a small Methodist college.
He would drive me home after school. I would hang around his office with several others, or stop by to chat after the activity period that followed the regular school day. He would offer me a lift home, and in the confines of his big white Pontiac convertible, we would talk. I lived only a mile and a half away from school, so he would circle block after block as we talked, or I talked about me, for a very long time. I remember little of what we talked about, except for one time when I solicited his support for my decision not to ask a girl to the prom. It had been put about that she wanted me to ask her, but I didn’t want to, and he said it was okay not to invite her and not to go.
I loved talking with him. I never talked with him about being gay. It never occurred to me, as I felt so comfortable just being with him. Sometimes, he would laugh and grab and squeeze my knee very hard, like how I would tickle some one now with whom I had some degree of physical intimacy.
It only occurred to me that he was gay after his roommate made a pass at me, and I met my first pedophile. My drama teacher had taken a job in California and had gone on ahead to find a house, and his roommate was to follow. Meanwhile, the two of them had a friend who worked for the Educational Testing Service and knew a lot about colleges. My teacher left it that his roommate would be in touch with me over the summer to set up a meeting between their friend and me, so that I could get some sense of what schools would be best for me.
It was a good meeting. I realized later that I had met my first lesbian couple, and they were living in respectable suburban circumstances. I learned a lot, and he drove me home. On the way, we were stopped by a very long freight train passing. His hand found my knee, not in the jolly way of his lover, my drama teacher, but in a caress that gave his intention away immediately. I turned away and simply ignored him, feeling scornful. How odd, I think now: to be scornful instead of so many other things. I suppose scorn was not a feeling, but a defensive reaction – a pose to counter his move. The train moved on, and so did we, the caress withdrawn without comment.
Two days later, he called me at home. “What about dinner and a swim?” he asked. It was so easy to say no. I knew what he wanted, and I didn’t want it. My mother overheard the conversation, and wanted to know what it was about. I was certainly not going to tell her what was really going on, that I was gay and my drama teacher’s lover was hitting on me, but I didn’t feel the need to confess or plead for protection either. I told her my teacher’s friend had invited me out, but I didn’t want to go. I ignored her interest in knowing more, and walked out of the room.
With my drama teacher confessor gone, I felt very lonely my senior year. I had sung in the school choir for four years, and was invited to join the music honor society. I was no Caruso, especially after my voice changed, and the audition was to be a trial. The assistant choir director stayed after school to help me prepare a solo piece, and he coached me with a kind of friendly dismay. He wore red socks, he was roly-poly, he made mistakes on the piano when he was nervous (which was often given that our director was a tyrant), and students made fun of him.
He offered me a ride home. As we stopped in front of my house, he asked if I wouldn’t mind answering a few questions. A friend of his was doing a study on the onset of male puberty, and my responses would be useful. He began to sweat heavily, and his upper lip trembled. I looked right at him, though he looked straight ahead. Where on your body do you have hair now? Under your arms? Your chest? Your genitals? With each of his questions, what I thought was his unease grew. I suppose now it was his arousal that grew.
I answered his questions, though I didn’t really like them. Once more, though, I knew I was in contact with a man who wanted something sexual from me, even if in this case, hearing rather than touching was enough.
I think I was just a cubby to my drama teacher, somebody he wanted to squeeze and tickle and make happy. I suppose, on the other hand, that his roommate/boyfriend liked boys. Perhaps this makes him a candidate pedophile like the music teacher. They were in their forties, and I was 16 by my senior year. Do the math.
I would hardly call myself a model of self-possession in those days. It took another six years and some pretty big hard knocks to come out. But I had felt sufficiently self-possessed, it seems in retrospect, to understand what my teacher’s boyfriend and my music teacher wanted, and to do what I wanted. Or at least to head off what I didn’t want.
Others were not so lucky. Over the years, I have heard many accounts from friends and acquaintances, women and men, about fathers, step-fathers, uncles, cousins, and big brothers who took them sexually, mostly against their wills. There must be mothers involved too, but I have never heard anything of the sort first hand.
I have often wondered: Did I in fact get a free pass? Were these more near misses than they seemed to me at the time? Was this pedophilia lite? The teacher’s boyfriend and the music teacher surely were no avatars of evil, deserving mean justice in a prison cell. Though they were surely interested in boys, I will never know where these experiences fit into their lives, and whether they had any meaning for them at all. Likely not much, to judge from a distance now.
(The music teacher might be glad he lived in another age, I might add. Just this year at my old high school, a teacher was convicted of molesting a student, and my nephew gave testimony at the trial.)
Where evil is so often imputed, I offer a cautionary tale. It is only one story, so take it for what it is worth. My story, however, makes me wary of how easily we adjudge pedophiles evil, and of how quickly we consider them less than human. When they commit crimes, they should be punished. In our time, have they ever as a class gone unpunished or been under-punished? The bar marking the age of consent has been raised and lowered from time to time, and from place to place, but it seems likely to me that an adult having sex with an under-age person, if discovered, would be punished. Rape adds violence, and adds penalties. As a lay person, it seems to me that the law is getting clearer on adult sex with minors and on sexual violence against persons of any age.
What lies beneath the clarities of law are these particular facts of life, the near misses, the halting gestures of perhaps a candidate pedophile or two, and the resolve of a gay teenager who wanted to be near older gay men, but not have sex with them. I think it would be naïve still to believe that my choice alone was the deciding factor. The two men came near, one nearer than the other, but both pulled back of their volition too.
One might say that in each of these cases a line was crossed, especially from our vantage point today. Yet one might just as easily say that a line was drawn by me or by them – and observed by both sides. Is the would-be pedophile who draws back an avatar? Is he touched by evil too?
For me, the path from judgment to justice is less secure, though perhaps it is because I got off lightly. Exactly so. These events and the lack of distress they caused then and now have awakened in me, given these times, the need to urge more careful examination of the facts in cases of pedophilia. To recover reason and proportion and to see this part of the world more clearly would be best for all.
It helps to me to think of Dante. Having reached the eighth circle of hell, and thus have practically imagined all the horror that evil can throw up at him, writes the following:
“The crowds, the countless, different mutilations,
had stunned my eyes and left them so confused
they wanted to keep looking and to weep,
But Virgil said: ‘What are you staring at?
Why do your eyes insist on drowning there
Below, among those wretched, broken shades?”
(Inferno, XXIX, 1-6)
Posted by Michael Blim at 02:13 AM | Permalink









Comments
Michael, thank you -- this is a moving and helpful contribution to the dialogue about transgressions against children and teenagers below the age of consent. The experiences you relate speak to a crucial issue that should be self-apparent but is not -- the legal difference between a pedophile and an adult who feels or even seeks arousal in the presence of the under-aged. When the history teacher is manifestly aroused by his 14-year old girl student, society says he'd better control himself, or else. When the history teacher is sexually stirred by his 14-year old boy student, pedophilia and its associations with inevitable transgression that the adult is criminally helpless to prevent, seems to be the watchword. It would be a very good thing if gay men with access to under-aged objects of desire were given the same trust for self-command as their sorely tempted hetero peers.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | May 7, 2007 9:33:04 AM
Normally when I think of "pedophilia" I think of someone attracted to prepubescent children, I wouldn't apply the label to those attracted to postpubescent teenagers--that would be "pederasty", at least in the case of two males. I think an adult becoming sexually involved with a teenager is exploitative and wrong, but there still seems to be a pretty big moral gulf between that and true pedophilia.
Posted by: Jesse M. | May 7, 2007 2:43:51 PM
Very brave of you to confront and consider these important issues, Michael, and with such sensitivity and candor. Bravo!
Posted by: Abbas Raza | May 7, 2007 2:44:13 PM
Michael--I so admire for telling this story, for broaching this subject in a manner so much more honest than the typical, US, hysterical manner. There no easy answers, as in any topic having to do with human sexuality. Thank you for inserting some thought into this discussion, and for sharing your personal story.
Posted by: Akbi | May 7, 2007 2:51:42 PM
Jesse M: I think the most accurate word here would be ephebophilia
Posted by: anonymous | May 7, 2007 3:31:41 PM
I was going to say what Jesse M. said. We recognize that the gap in experience and authority is problematic -- hence the age of consent, and frowning on extreme May-Decembers. Nonetheless, a teenager is not nearly so, well, helpless in the sexual relationship arena as a prepubescent child.
Also, I rather doubt that most mothers can cease to love their children, even those who turn out to be paedophiles.
Posted by: Bill | May 7, 2007 3:34:25 PM
I recall sitting in my bed at about 2AM last summer, watching the television. I flipped back and forth between the news channels, passing the time in horror.
Nancy Grace was raging against the opposition to a new law that would make it so sexual predators cannot live within 300 yards of a bus stop. On MSNBC a 12-year-old girl went missing on a mountain, and sexual predators were blamed for coercing her over the Internet. On another channel, Glenn Beck stood in front of a furnace on a green screen, shouting that we should burn all child molesters. Then there was an ad for a new episode of To Catch a Predator.
Our obsession with pedophiles (and exposing them) can't be healthy for anyone.
Posted by: Cyberpunk Hero | May 7, 2007 3:48:44 PM
Pedophilia, an evolving concept. Up to the late 19th century Maryland had the age of consent set at 7 years old. An English king's (Henry IV ?) mother gave birth to him when she was 12. Yes, she was married. And of course it is a great scandal (among modern Christian Americans) that Mohammad took a young Egyptian girl (11 yrs?) as a wife. And the ancient Greeks were, more or less (depends on who you read), accepting of man-boy love.
Human sexuality is a complicated thing. One could write a very big book on the subject. When I was 5 I had a terrible crush on an older woman. She was 6 and already in school. She didn't even know I existed. She was from a Dutch family and looked it, with her sparkly blue eyes and golden ringlets. She would go skipping down the sidewalk in a flounced skirt and mary-janes and my heart would break (yes, it's a stereotype, but this was about 1959). She was so cute, sigh. I am sorry but I am making a joke of human sexuality. The real joke is that for the next 4 decades I was absolutely enthralled by women. It wasn't always fun. In fact most of the time it was quite embarassing and emotionally painful. After a lifetime of smoking and drinking coffee, 2 divorces, a couple of bouts of severe depression my interest in women disappeared. Was I upset? Hell no! It was like having a tremendous weight lifted off me. It was like all of a sudden discovering that you don't have to eat or breath anymore. Freedom! Keep your goddamn Viagra! At least that's the way I felt at first, there's still the loneliness.
Not very long ago I had a dream where I met an attractive woman. I felt elated because she seemed to like me. We separated and I was anxious to to get back together. When I saw her again she appeared younger than I remembered. I thought "Well, nothing wrong with that. She apparently still likes me." I was vaguely anxious that she would think me too old. We parted again. When I next saw her she had turned into a child! It was a terrible let down. She smiled and was happy to see me but there was no longer any romantic chemistry. The feeling was gone. She just sat on the floor and played with her toys. A very funny dream. I laughed at myself when I woke up. What a joke to play on a guy.
I don't see anything in Michael's experience that he should feel bad about. I had some similar experiences being hit on by men when I was a teenager. I hung out in circles where it wasn't "evil" to be gay. They just embarassed me slightly. Feel sorry for those old guys. So obviously lonely. But straight or gay we all suffer for our sexuality. It is Mother Nature's due.
Posted by: aquariid | May 7, 2007 9:41:09 PM
I think Sting said it best. ~Dont stand, dont stand, dont stand so close to me ~
Posted by: mickey | May 7, 2007 9:49:22 PM
Thanks everyone for your comments. The issue of appropriate terms has caused me to think of how a term like pedophilia becomes an everyday gloss for a spectrum of taboo behavior, despite the fact rightly that several of you have suggested more specific and descriptive terms.
The ease with which I used the term now surprises me as you suggest alternatives.
I might have written, and perhaps I should write about the remarkable rise of the term "sexual predator" with its feral and instinctive connotations.
Once more thanks for your comments.
Posted by: Michael Blim | May 8, 2007 10:15:57 AM
Post a comment