| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« More on Belief and Reason, A Believer's Response | Main | perceptions: the essence of home »

April 16, 2007

France: As the Left Falls Apart, Will the Center Hold?

by Ruth Crossman

The first round in the French presidential election is less than a week away, and the top contenders are still running hard. The neo-Gaullist Interior Minister Sarkozy enjoys a commanding lead in the polls, but the fate of Socialist Ségolène Royal is less certain; she has spent the last several months trailing behind third-party candidate François Bayrou in the polls. Bayrou’s performance was been the surprise of the campaign season. The self styled outsider and Third Way maven has superseded the radical populist Jean-Marie Le Pen as the official ‘Third Man’ of French politics. But the question is whether voters truly prefer Bayrou’s policies, or if they have simply bought into his packaging.

061216_nextroyal_xtrawide_2

Bayrou comes from the center-right UDF (Union for the Defense of France,) the faction associated with the liberal policies of former President Valery Giscard D’Estaing, in opposition to the RPR (Rally for the Republic,) the party of neo-Gaullist Jacques Chirac. The relationship between the two parties is been complex. In general, they compete during presidential elections and ally during legislative elections. The RPR was dissolved in 2002 (after the indictment of party leaders on corruption charges) and replaced by the UMP (Union for a Popular Movement), which was established as an electoral vehicle for Chirac, before succumbing to a friendly takeover at the hands of his former protégé, Nicolas Sarkozy. Bayrou, who garnered only 6% of the vote in 2002, has used the ascension of Sarkozy to reinvent himself. Historically, one of the defining splits between the UDF and the Gaullists was the economic role of the state. But Sarkozy has completely effaced this cleavage by running on a platform of aggressive neo-liberalism. This has allowed Bayrou to run to his left, positioning himself as a ‘Third Way’ candidate in the mold of Clinton and Blair. By promoting economic reform coupled with continuing social protection, Bayrou attracts those (and there are many) who feel that Sarkozy is too extreme.

Sarkozy_edited_2

Given the historical rivalry between the UDF and the RPR, Sarkozy’s loss of support to Bayrou is understandable. What is more remarkable, and more telling, is the level of defection from the left. On February 22 the left-leaning newspaper Libération carried an endorsement of Bayrou penned by 30 high ranking Socialist functionaries. Even schoolteachers, who have historically been a bed rock of support for the Socialists, are now split, with 45% supporting Bayrou. Royal now faces the possibility of being the second Socialist candidate in a row to be eliminated in the first round.

Images_2

The general consensus in the French media is that Royal ran her campaign badly. It is true that she has made several gaffes (such as calling for Québécois independence during a visit to Canada,) and has suffered from her association with Socialist “elephants” such as Jack Lang and Lionel Jospin. But many of her problems are actually structural. Politics in France have undergone a series of realignments, and the ‘Old Left’ has become more and more irrelevant. The Socialist Party itself is becoming increasingly fractured over questions of economic policy, and the presidential campaign only highlighted the lack of party unity. In February, Party Secretary Eric Bésson resigned his post after a public dispute with Royal over the cost of her social proposals. Royal refuses to discuss specific figures, a strategy which has only deepened the public’s suspicion that she is either economically irresponsible or politically disingenuous. At this point in time, hard core leftists are likely to opt for smaller and more extreme parties in the first round (as they did in 2002), while moderates are increasingly likely to support Bayrou. If it continues to bleed votes from the left and the right, the Socialist Party will be doomed.

It is still unclear what Bayrou’s popularity signifies. Are the French finally willing to quit treating ‘liberalism’ like a dirty word? Does Bayrou’s promise of a balanced budget carry more weight than Sarkozy’s nationalism and Royal’s appeal to equality? If Bayrou defeats Sarkozy in the second round, a scenario which is becoming increasingly likely, will the government finally be able to carry out economic reforms without triggering protests? Or is Bayrou merely a highly polished and processed protest candidate?

Posted by Robin Varghese at 12:28 AM | Permalink

Comments

What an interesting analysis! I wonder if France is really on the verge of a major political shift or things will return to "normal"? I also wonder what Ms. Crossman thinks of the article in the NYT Sunday magazine on the cites in France or the Economist's "case for Nicolas Sarkozy."

Posted by: sheri | Apr 16, 2007 1:40:34 PM

If we take a wide view, say from the first election of the PS to the French presidency more than 25 years ago, it would seem that France, and especially the French Left, is always realigning but never quite realigned. The PS back then quickly moved from anarcho-syndicalist rhetoric of "autogestion" to the language of modern managment. One interesting piece of evidence for the absence of any stabilization of the social base of the left can be found in the electoral trajectories of the various party affiliated and independent trade-unions (and non-unions) in the host of representative bodies that make up the french social and economic landscape. The fluxes are slow enough to seem like trends towards a new balance. And yet, they never settle, and instead move in a different direction. The weird electoral and ideological movements of the French Greens (Les verts)--what can you say of a party in which you have Alain Lipietz suing the national railways for the deportation of his family to Nazi concentration camps AND Ginette Skandrani, who openly affiliated with Holocaust deniers?-- and the Trotskyists of the LO and LCR are also signs.

The socialist party may be doomed because in some sense it was born doomed. It had no solid organized base to speak of, and had the good fortune of reorienting itself to capture the radicalization of the French Confederation of Christian Workers into the CFDT and the student protests. It also helped that the French Commies became more and more a caricature of a pro-Moscow stooge with each passing year and couldn't really come up with any clear ideas for France. But the PS's social and economic platforms have been incoherent since it first came to Presidential power in 1981.

But here's a thought: perhaps for the left to really modernize and reviltalize in France, the PS has to go. When the last Socialist head of state or government that the left remembers fondly happens to Mendes-France, well, you have a problem. (For me personally, you'd have to go back to Juan Juares.)

Posted by: Robin | Apr 16, 2007 2:48:50 PM

Jean Juares, not Juan.

Posted by: Robin | Apr 16, 2007 2:55:25 PM

HI! have a look on my blog: I am an artist born in Oran(Algeria) before independance ,
I am running for François BAYROU , he is the man who works for harmony in his country.

Posted by: CAGGINI | Apr 17, 2007 6:12:12 AM

FORGET TO LEAVE MY BLOG

Posted by: caggini | Apr 17, 2007 6:14:04 AM

Dear Ruth,

François Bayrou has never been ahead of Royal in the polls.

Posted by: curty | Apr 18, 2007 3:20:36 PM

Dear Curty,

Please note that I have edited your comment above to be the polite correction that it should have been in the first place.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Apr 18, 2007 5:05:08 PM

Dear Abbas,

Please note that you are not in a position to tell anyone what should or what should not have been. You would do much better to firmly chastise dear Ruth for her lack of journalistic rigor rather than foisting your mediocre sense of politcal correctness upon someone who at least has the merit of knowing what the hell he's talking about.

Posted by: curty | Apr 19, 2007 6:57:56 AM

Curty, I like your tone better already. Glad to see you're not beyond learning. Nor are we, for that matter, so thanks for supplying the correction.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Apr 19, 2007 3:26:29 PM

Hi there Curty,
I just wanted to respond to your comments. I did make a mistake when I said that Bayrou had led Royal in terms of projected vote share. The poll I was referring to (The IFOP survey conducted March 8-9) showed that the two were tied. You can find the data here:
http://fr.news.yahoo.com/10032007/202/ifop-bayrou-au-niveau-de-segolene-royal-23-au-premier.html
However, Bayrou has been leading Royal in terms of *popularity* (ie favorability/likability) in the IPSOS polls for some time now.
Furthermore, I must say that, although I regret this error, I don't see how it actually alters the observations I made in my article.
best,
Ruth

Posted by: ruth | Apr 19, 2007 4:56:25 PM

Dear Ruth,

Oh come on.

You said Royal has spent the last several months trailing behind Bayrou in the polls. There exists no doubt that you were referring to those polls that attempt to measure for whom people have the intention of voting in the first round of the upcoming French presidential elections.

As to how this falsehood alters your article, it is for you to say, for one fails to see how it could not alter it being utterly false, if it would have altered it had it been the least bit true. One is therefore forced to conclude that this part of your piece should have been left out altogether, for reasons of superfluity and extraneousness, which only further reinforces my impression that you fail to master both the subject you address as well as the manner in which you address it.

Posted by: curty | Apr 20, 2007 7:08:22 AM

Jean Jaurès, not Juares!!! (Well, except there may be a Juan Juares somewhere i never heard of!). And do not forget the "accent grave" on the final "e" for reason of prononciation.
Also, curty, you are a pissant (cf. Kurt Vonnegut).

Posted by: jean-paul | Apr 21, 2007 2:38:57 AM

Cher Jean-Paul,

Dans tous les forums, il y a des correcteurs d'orthographe qui compensent ainsi leurs manque d'idées de fond.

Ceci dit, je n'ai contre une grammaire impeccable et la prochaine fois j'ai envie de troubler une mouche par derrière, je pencherai sur ton anglais.

Posted by: curty | Apr 21, 2007 4:51:15 AM

Cher Jean-Paul,

Dans tous les forums, il y a des correcteurs d'orthographe qui compensent ainsi leurs manque d'idées de fond.

Ceci dit, je n'ai contre une grammaire impeccable et la prochaine fois j'ai envie de troubler une mouche par derrière, je pencherai sur ton anglais.

Posted by: curty | Apr 21, 2007 4:51:56 AM

Sorry for posting the same thing twice.

Je voulais dire :

"... je n'ai _rien_ contre"

bien entendu

Posted by: curty | Apr 21, 2007 8:20:10 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    Louise Gordon on Everyone Should See "Torturing Democracy"

    Louise Gordon on The Swedish dream is no more

    atomburke on Will Europe’s Economies Regain Their Footing?

    aguy109 on my ten favorite fetishes

    Elatia Harris on my ten favorite fetishes

    Elatia Harris on my ten favorite fetishes

    Elatia Harris on crowds, clowns, contempt, and cacophony

    maniza on Friday Poem

    Jesse on crowds, clowns, contempt, and cacophony

    David Schneider on Friday Poem

    Dave Ranning on Friday Poem

    maniza on The Improbable American

    Ruchira on Friday Poem

    D on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Dave Ranning on The resignation speech of Sarah Palin: a deconstruction

    bill on Ah the singing, ah the delight, the passion!

    Fill on The resignation speech of Sarah Palin: a deconstruction

    Luke Lea on tatlin

    Richard on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Dave Ranning on Thursday Poem

    Frances Madeson on Lessons from an Unexpected Life

    maniza on Thursday Poem

    maniza on Thursday Poem

    David Schneider on Thursday Poem

    Elatia Harris on Lessons from an Unexpected Life

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed