| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Black Woodstock | Main | Eat, Drink and Be Merry »

February 13, 2007

The Cost of the Iraq War: Can You Say $1,000,000,000,000?

John Allen Paulos in his Who's Counting column at ABC News:

TrillionThe price tag for the Iraq War is now estimated at $700 billion in direct costs and perhaps twice that much when indirect expenditures are included. Cost estimates vary — Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz puts the total cost at more than $2 trillion — but let's be conservative and say it's only $1 trillion (in today's dollars).

As a number of other commentators have recently written, this number — a 1 followed by 12 zeroes — can be put into perspective in various ways. Given how large the war looms, it doesn't hurt to repeat this simple exercise with other examples and in other ways.

There are many comparisons that might be made, and devising new governmental monetary units is one way to make them. Consider, for example, that the value of one EPA, the annual budget of the Environmental Protection Agency, is about $7.5 billion. The cost of the Iraq War is thus more than a century's worth of EPA spending (in today's dollars), almost 130 EPAs, only a small handful of which would probably have been sufficient to clean up Superfund sites around the country.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 09:02 PM | Permalink

Comments

Speaking of World War III, here's what I found online: http://www.notoworldwar3.com. The ad space is expensive however. :(

Posted by: rina | Feb 14, 2007 7:36:31 AM

isn't the math wrong in the excerpt?

7.5 billion times 130 doesn't come close to 1,000,000,000,000.

a trillion is 1000 billions. not 100 billions. one can count up to 999 billions before getting to one trillion.

thus 7.5 billion is much less than 130 times smaller than a trillion -- or, a trillion is much more than 130 time greater than 7.5 billion.

a trillion is one thousand times larger than a single billion.

Posted by: anonymous | Feb 14, 2007 7:04:47 PM

Anonymous,

I'd be a little more careful attacking the arithmetic of a math professor.

7.5 billion times 130 is 975 billion, which is pretty close to a thousand billion. Alternatively, one trillion divided by 130 is 7.69 billion. And, yes, you are right: one trillion is a thousand billion.

Where's the problem?

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Feb 14, 2007 7:58:27 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    bill on Ah the singing, ah the delight, the passion!

    Fill on The resignation speech of Sarah Palin: a deconstruction

    Luke Lea on tatlin

    Richard on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Dave Ranning on Thursday Poem

    Frances Madeson on Lessons from an Unexpected Life

    maniza on Thursday Poem

    maniza on Thursday Poem

    David Schneider on Thursday Poem

    Elatia Harris on Lessons from an Unexpected Life

    Thomas Decker on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Jonathan on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Frank on Hitler finds out Michael Jackson has died

    Louise Gordon on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Louise Gordon on The Improbable American

    Hektor Bim on The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

    maniza on The Improbable American

    Justin E. H. Smith on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Louise Gordon on Todd Shea: The Improbable 3QD Commenter

    fred lapides on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Chrystal K. on The resignation speech of Sarah Palin: a deconstruction

    Brian on Baldwin in Istanbul

    Pepito on Anti-Semitism in Chávez’s Venezuela

    Mike Cope on Philosophy as Complementary Science

    Louise Gordon on The Improbable American

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed