| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Younger siblings up the odds of brain cancer | Main | la beijing »

December 12, 2006

Gandhi's nonviolent principles show way toward peaceful world

From The Harvard Gazette:

Gandhi2225 The nonviolent principles of Mohandas Gandhi may be the only way to bring peace to the world, Gandhi's granddaughter said. Human rights activist and former South African member of parliament Ela Gandhi told about 160 people gathered in Harvard Law School's Pound Hall that violent victory sows the seeds of its own destruction. It is only through nonviolent resistance and dispute resolution, the focus of Mohandas Gandhi's Satyagraha philosophy, that the world can become a peaceful place, she said.

Susan Hackley, the Program on Negotiation's managing director, said Mohandas Gandhi's principles provided the foundation for later movements by celebrated leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and Lech Walesa. "The history of the last 100 years includes some breathtaking success stories ... [by leaders who] brought about profound change without violence," Hackley said. "All of these leaders would no doubt declare they owe a great debt to one person who 100 years ago developed a method and a philosophy for dealing with oppression that showed them how to stand up to overwhelming force."

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 05:47 AM | Permalink

Comments

too silly to comment extensively.
surrice it to ote that this great pacifist suggested that Jews being taken to gas chambers should have used passive resistance. That of couse would make the job easier!

Posted by: fred.lapides | Dec 12, 2006 7:46:14 AM

Well, even eminent persons sometimes say things that make you scratch your head. As the Japanese say, even monkeys fall out of trees.

Posted by: JonJ | Dec 12, 2006 2:18:30 PM

fred lapides wrote: this great pacifist suggested that Jews being taken to gas chambers should have used passive resistance. That of couse would make the job easier!

I'm not sure what you are suggesting. Are you suggesting that if Hitler's victims had practiced non-violent resistance, things would have turned out worse for them? How much worse could it have gotten?

Or are you suggesting a third alternate history, in which the victims used violent resistance? Maybe things would have turned out differently in that case, but that's certainly not clear. I don't think the Jews had the numbers or the weapons or the public support to have maintained a rebellion against Hitler. Such a rebellion would have been crushed, and from there things would have proceeded as they did.

It's not at all clear that Hitler's victims could have done anything to save themselves. What would have made a difference is if the non-Jewish, non-Slavic German majority had said no to Hitler. I don't have any way of knowing what (if anything) could have led to such an outcome.

Posted by: Daryl McCullough | Dec 12, 2006 8:34:25 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Politics Prize

Donate to Todd Shea

More info about Todd Shea and his work here on 3QD.

3QD ADVERTISING

3QD on Facebook

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

czrpb on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

chris on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

odysseus14 on The World's Fastest Animal Takes New York

Daniel on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Robin on The Incomparable Economist

odysseus14 on The Incomparable Economist

Cyrus Hall on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Jane Lenoir on The Humanists: Frederick Wiseman's High School (1968)

Norman Costa on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

Norman Costa on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

czrpb on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Daniel on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Elatia Harris on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

chris on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Carlos on you can't handle the truth

Nick Smyth on you can't handle the truth

eric on you can't handle the truth

Ruchira on The Obama Nobel Speech: What It Reveals and What It Conceals

Randolyn Zinn on Shards and Fragments: Eva Hesse Studioworks

Luke Lea on Hollywood gives biologists a helping hand

Chris Schoen on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

Rhea on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

Chris Schoen on Psychological Science: Measurement, Uncertainty, and Determinism – Part 1

J.H. on you can't handle the truth

J.H. on The World's Fastest Animal Takes New York

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes


Logos designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed