October 10, 2006
The Return of Henry Kissinger: Will we never be free of the malign effect of this little gargoyle?
Christopher Hitchens in Slate:
Bob Woodward's disclosure of the influence of Henry Kissinger on the Bush administration's Iraq policy both is and is not a surprise. After all, we have known for a long time that the bungling old war criminal has his admirers within the White House. Did not the president, almost but not quite incredibly, call on him as the first chairman of the 9/11 commission? Kissinger's initial acceptance of that honor was swiftly withdrawn after it was pointed out—first of all in this space, if I may say so—that he would have to make a full disclosure of the interests of Kissinger Associates in the Middle East. This condition was too much for him. (I added that, since he was wanted for questioning by magistrates in France, Chile, and Argentina, in connection with offenses of state terrorism, his appointment to a position of such high eminence at such a time might expose the United States to ridicule, not to say contempt.)
Then the Bush administration took the decision to appoint Paul Bremer, a former partner of Kissinger Associates, as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority...
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 01:15 AM | Permalink









Comments
Don't blame Henry! Blame the fooks that listen to him
Posted by: fred lapides | Oct 10, 2006 11:32:56 AM
If you like war, surround yourself with war mongers.
Posted by: beajerry | Oct 10, 2006 12:30:25 PM
Calling him a gargoyle reflects poorly on Hitchens. It sounds like childish name-calling that makes no sense. I'd expect that from a nine-year old.
Posted by: Toby Shandy | Oct 10, 2006 12:38:26 PM
Yes, if Kissinger is a gargoyle then Hitchens is a leech clamping his mandibles deep into his scaly ass.
Posted by: lollercaust | Oct 12, 2006 12:01:43 PM
Post a comment