| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Geneticist Bruce Lahn discusses ongoing evolution of humans | Main | PERCEPTIONS: is there something above my head? »

September 18, 2006

Lives of the Cannibals: In Search Of

I am most often described by those who know me as venerable, though I am not particularly old. Sagacious, Solomonic and wise are other frequently used descriptors. Once, a lady who lived above me in a beleaguered section of Oakland, California, and whose business it was to know these things, said that I was a judge of some kind in a previous life. This did not surprise me. I have felt myself, from a very young age, standing just above and a bit to the side, perceiving you in your true form, despite your efforts to conceal the raw nature of your soul. I am regularly called upon to settle disputes of all kinds, ranging from the picayune to the momentous, by those who know me and understand the depth of my comprehension, and by anonymous passers-by as well, who are overcome with sudden knowledge of the rarefied workings of my mind. I would make a fine Senator, Supreme, or delegate to the UN, but I would find the duties gravely limiting--to court the benighted electorate, to interpret a relic, to navigate the shoals of global bureaucracy. None of these interests me. Better to remain aloof, I say, a generalist. Better to be a wizard for the benefit of Everyman.

I am sexually adored by all who lay eyes on me, and frequently by those who do not. The blind make clumsy passes, tossing away their canes and leashes so that their hands may be free to caress. The developmentally disabled and emotionally disturbed suffer spasmodic fits of desire when in my presence. Autistics are especially enamored of my voice, to which they pay unrelenting attention. Gay men queue at my front door, hoping to interest me in their society, and straight men forsake their wives and children in hope of brief union. Lesbians reconfigure their sexual identities when I pass them on the street, rending their clothes and falling to their knees. In fact, women of all ages and descriptions are powerless to withstand my appeal. I have been assaulted by crones, who employ their walkers to cage me, and by prepubescent schoolgirls, whose ceaseless screams of delight fill the streets after 3 pm.

Animals travel great distances to walk at my side. Dogs lunge and tear at those who would approach without permission. Cats submit their kill for approval, exposing their bellies as evidence of their submission. Birds nest below my window to raise their young in close proximity to my benevolence. Wolves cross mountain ranges to stand sentinel at my door, baying in harmonic fifths to mark my comings and goings. Insects, too, pay me their fealty: Ants construct their colonies at the foot of my stoop, and bees renounce the biological imperative of the hive to fly in formation in my wake.

There is a physical genius about me that captivates professional athletes, whose accomplishments become laughable when considered beside the potentials of my own muscle and sinew. I am known for my grace as well as my ferocity, for the force collected in the clutch of my fist, and for the kinetic beauty of my leaping form. Every major professional sport has petitioned me--not to participate, for that would obliterate parity, but for my talismanic presence, as an object of aspiration, an instance of superiority. Olympic teams from no fewer than 16 countries have requested my peak-performance expertise. Lance Armstrong credits me with every one of his Tour de France triumphs.

I have been offered fellowships at scores of major universities in the United States and Western Europe. Deans and Provosts clamber for my advice on organizational psychology, as applied in academic settings. Professors of English beg me to elucidate the subtleties of Beckett and Gaddis; Professors of Astrophysics humbly request my thoughts on the perturbations of orbiting bodies in distant solar systems. Hawking threatened to throw himself from his chair in a fit of pique at the shining light of my intellect.

I am a master thespian, flawlessly embodying the dramatic roles I undertake. Directors, shame-faced and desperate, request critiques of their conceptual frameworks, and feverishly take notes when I humor them with my insight. Actors weep for the sheer transformative power of pathos in my performances. Aesthetes are driven to suicide. Uta Hagen herself once dissolved into tears in the face of my one-man interpretation of A Midsummer Night's Dream.

I am regularly accosted by mothers who would have their babies touched with grace from my lips. The maimed and deformed claw at one another in their seething masses, to enjoy the restorative powers of my healing hands. Holy men prostrate themselves on my doorstep, to resurrect their flagging faith.

I am 37 years-old, 5'9, with brown, wavy hair, almond-shaped eyes and an aquiline nose. My complexion is clear. My weight fluctuates between 165 and 170 pounds. I work out four times a week at Crunch, on the stationary bicycle, with free weights, and on the elliptical machine. My pectoral muscles are massive and mobile. My abdomen is corrugated.

DWM

ISO

SWF, 19 - 25 years-old, brunette or blonde, who enjoys films, walks in the park, chinese food, and margaritas. Education unimportant. Appearance primary. The surgically enhanced are encouraged to apply. Respond to box #3678. Your pic gets mine.

Thanx!

--Leonard.

[a bloody tip of the scalp to Joe Frank]

Posted by Jedediah Palmer at 12:00 AM | Permalink

Comments

Don't get too excited, girls, he's probably short, spotty and lives with mom.

Posted by: aguy109 | Sep 18, 2006 4:19:54 AM

Good shit, Jed! (And, no shit, aguy109.)

My pitch, of course, is under "Monday Columns."

Cheers and ciao for now.

Posted by: HMN | Sep 18, 2006 4:27:22 AM

Brilliantly funny stuff, Jed.

Reminds me of this admissions application essay that went around about 10 years ago:

In order for the admissions staff of our college to get to know you, the applicant, better, we ask that you answer the following question:

Are there any significant experiences you have had, or accomplishments you have realized, that have helped to define you as a person?

I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling walls and crushing ice. I have been known to remodel train stations on my lunch breaks, making them more efficient in the area of heat retention. I translate ethnic slurs for Cuban refugees, I write award-winning operas, I manage time efficiently. Occasionally, I tread water for three days in a row.

I woo women with my sensuous and godlike trombone playing, I can pilot bicycles up severe inclines with unflagging speed, and I cook Thirty Minute Brownies in twenty minutes. I am an expert in stucco, a veteran in love, and an outlaw in Peru.

Using only a hoe and a large glass of water, I once single-handedly defended a small village in the Amazon Basin from a horde of ferocious army ants. I play bluegrass cello, I was scouted by the Mets. I am the subject of numerous documentaries. When I'm bored, I build large suspension bridges in my yard. I enjoy urban hang gliding. On Wednesdays, after school, I repair electrical appliances free of charge.

I am an abstract artist, a concrete analyst, and a ruthless bookie. Critics worldwide swoon over my original line of corduroy evening wear. I don't perspire. I am a private citizen, yet I receive fan mail. I have been caller number nine and won the weekend passes. Last summer I toured New Jersey with a traveling centrifugal-force demonstration. I bat .400. My deft floral arrangements have earned me fame in international botany circles. Children trust me.

I can hurl tennis rackets at small moving objects with deadly accuracy. I once read Paradise Lost, Moby Dick, and David Copperfield in one day and still had time to refurbish an entire dining room that evening. I know the exact location of every food item in the supermarket. I have performed covert operations for the CIA. I sleep once a week; when I do sleep, I sleep in a chair. While on vacation in Canada, I successfully negotiated with a group of terrorists who had seized a small bakery. The laws of physics do not apply to me.

I balance, I weave, I dodge, I frolic, and my bills are all paid. On weekends, to let off steam, I participate in full-contact origami. Years ago I discovered the meaning of life but forgot to write it down. I have made extraordinary four-course meals using only a Mouli and a toaster oven. I breed prizewinning clams. I have won bullfights in San Juan, cliff-diving competitions in Sri Lanka, and spelling bees at the Kremlin. I have played Hamlet, I have performed open-heart surgery, and I have spoken with Elvis.

But I have not yet gone to college.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Sep 18, 2006 4:39:38 PM

Jed, you're the greatest. But you may owe me a MacBook Pro. There is Irish Breakfast spattered all over my screen.

Posted by: Asad | Sep 18, 2006 5:55:07 PM

Abbas, you turd. You've upstaged me. Talk about brilliantly funny. I think Asad must have been reading THAT when he spewed tea on his computer.

Posted by: Jed | Sep 18, 2006 7:49:26 PM

Wow, you guys should really form a circle jerk club.

Posted by: gerard | Sep 19, 2006 10:02:12 AM


I'll still take Ira Gershwin's version - shorter and quite a bit sweeter.

Posted by: Milburn Stone | Sep 19, 2006 6:16:32 PM

That certainly was a pleasing circle jerk.

Just to be able to read such a masterpiece is an honor. Just to be alive. To savor. To sip the genius.

I digress.

Kinda lame rip off. I tried to get Joe Frank to give me his original version which Jed ripped off. Interesting comparison between the two. He told me people are free to buy it on-line. Jed, Joe's a sick old dude... stealing from him does no one any good.

Jed credits Joe with a tip of a bloody scalp.

Joe's thoughts:

He writes well. On the other hand, he's ripping me off ("The Loved One"). They say "Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery." Nevertheless, I find this annoying. After all, what does he intend to do with this material? Pass it off as his own? He seems smart and talented enough to come up with his own premise, not write a piece that literally parallels mine.

Posted by: Wanker | Sep 22, 2006 1:49:20 AM

Joe,

Huh? Your idea of plagiarism is interesting, and a little frightening too. Are we to believe you created amusing, self-referential hyperbole? Or is it just self-referential hyperbole with a stress on sexual charisma that you're responsible for? (Incidentally, the piece in reference here is "Lover Man," not "The Loved One." Might want to review your catalogue). The material IS my own, but, for good measure, I noted my debt to you, since your piece did indeed inspire me. Or did you miss that part? The attribution is right at the bottom. Check it out. And while you're at it, check out the piece of amusing, self-referential hyperbole printed in the comments section, just above Steven's charming contribution. That's something that was making the rounds about 10 years ago apparently, which is, according to the copyright date on your CD, several years before "Lover Man" was recorded. Admittedly, it doesn't focus strictly on sexual charisma (as "Lover Man" does), but then again, neither does "In Search Of." Might you owe a bloody tip of the scalp to the author of that one? Or were you just inspired? What a shame to hear from you in this unfortunate, second-hand manner (Steven: did Joe know you would make this nonsense public?). I would have hoped for something more gracious, and much less foolish.

Yours (but a bit less so),

Jed.

Posted by: Jed | Sep 22, 2006 3:40:16 AM

Steven and Joe,

Easy on with the accusations of plagiarism! I've known Jed for a long time and am easily willing to defend him without having to know all the details of Joe's piece. (And let's see it, by the way?!)

Jed's integrity is beyond question I'll have you know, and as he points out in his comment above, if he had the least bit of guilt about "stealing" from someone, it is highly unlikely that he would then credit them as inspiring him!

His piece stands as a brilliant bit of satire, and I stand beside him. If you have any decency, you will withdraw your ludicrously emotional accusations.

Steven, you are my old friend, but I am afraid you are wrong this time. I defy you to produce the piece by Joe and then let our readers judge for themselves whether Jed is guilty of plagiarism, which he surely is not. I promise to publish it at 3QD, with the whole sad story. Go ahead, make my day...

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Sep 22, 2006 4:11:28 AM

Hi Abbas,

First off sorry about the rude comments. It was an emotional moment for me and I was angry at what I viewed as a circle jerk of congratulatory statements on what I thought to be a derivative writing style. Joe is a very old, dear friend and I happened to have just visited him. He is also in recovery from a serious illness. I doubt I would have written anything had those two events not happened so close by.

In moments of anger we all say or write stupid and regretful things. Joe's comments were paraphrased and without doubt my feelings came through. I am allowed my opinion. See what people think. By the way, the piece first appeared in "The Loved One" broadcast in 1993, and I think Joe said he wrote it in 1992 sometime, which would be about 13-14 years ago. Maybe the writer of the admissions application circulating 10 years ago was an inspired JF fan, too.

Perhaps some interesting and hopefully civil discourse may come of this. Walking down the street can be inspiring, art’s always had a muse around and none of us live in a bubble.

I encourage anyone who is interested to track down a copy of the original program. Here is a transcript of the segment in question. I'm curious to see what you and others think.

Best,
Steve.


*The Loved One:*

Is it the smoldering beauty of my purple eyes? The leonine mane of hair that I toss carelessly? Is it my long eyelashes? Is it my muscular, volcanic energy? Is it my perfectly sculptured Greek body? Who knows. But they all find me irresistible. They want to touch me and rub up against me. They want a hair from my head, an article of my clothing. They want me to breathe on them.

Is it my suave, sweet, utterly charming, disarming and yet unassuming down-to-earth style? Is it the quality of my mind? The endlessly amusing, sometimes profoundly moving stories I tell? Is it my command of language? The depth of my insights? The sheer scope and range of my knowledge? The synthesis of my intellect as it ranges over a wide field of topics? Able to discuss the manufacture of extruded molybdenum, renaissance printmaking, various schools of Japanese sword-making under the Toranga Shogunate? The temperate scale before Bach? The history of aniline dyes, North African leather-curing techniques, the flora of the western Appalachian slopes? Comb-filtered developments in digital tuners and subatomic particles attendant to the cluster of Black Holes as postulated by Hawking? Is it because I’m a world-class expert in bioluminescence and have developed my own species of fluorescent porcupines?

All I know is that my presence in a room is electrifying. I can see desire burning hotly like coals in people’s eyes when they look at me. I can see them undressing me—the smoldering gazes of women, compulsively crossing and uncrossing their legs, men grinding their molars while sweat forms in hot beads on their brows, teenaged girls digging their nails into the palms of their hands, their lips parted, their eyes wet with desire.

I was a magnificent baby with pearly white teeth, creamy peach-colored skin, hands and feet perfectly formed. My ears were small shells; my lips, a red flower. My face recalled Cherubim, the most beautiful of choiring angels. I was, in fact, a perfect renaissance painting of a baby.

In grade school, next to me, all the other children looked plain, awkward, ugly, overpowered by the radiance of my physical beauty. A number of them actually committed suicide. The notes they left behind mentioned me by name. They said: “I can never be as beautiful as Joe. I can never be as perfectly realized as Joe. There’s no point in living.” The school was forced to organize seminars and focus groups. And the mayor appointed a board of eminent psychiatrists and social workers to raise the self esteem of the children, which had been undermined by my presence.

Yes, there is no one else like me.

In the supermarket, I was at the counter when the checkout girl, looking at me—her pupils going wide and then up into her skull—fainted dead away. When I went to the cleaners to pick up my clothes, the woman behind the counter said she couldn’t find them, but I was told by her 14-year-old nephew that, in fact, she had them at home and was keeping them for some votive or religious purpose. The very last time I took a taxi cab, the driver refused to let me out and drove me around back streets and freeways just for the pleasure of looking at me in the rear view mirror—never stopping anywhere until he ran out of gas. And when I climbed out of his cab, he pursued me. Clutching at my clothes.

The other day, I went to a copy center and was set upon by a number of women who tore off my clothes and carried me to the Xerox machine where they held me down against the glass in order to make multiple reproductions of my face, the undersides of my hands and feet, my buttocks, the soft under-portion of my arms, the crook of my elbow, and the flesh behind my ears.

Can you imagine how humiliating this was? It’s impossible for anyone who hasn’t lived in my skin to realize the moment-by-moment agony I suffer on a daily basis.

I remember a few weeks ago when I was presenting a financial summary for the restructuring of debt to leverage a corporate takeover. The executive vice president, an attractive woman in her late 30s, became entirely distracted. Her hands fidgeted and she bit her lip as her eyes raced up and down my body. I could feel the heat of her excitement through her clothing. And then, suddenly, she ripped open her blouse and skirt—the buttons cascading noisily on the surface of the highly-polished conference table—and leapt at me. Her garter, having been caught on the underside of her chair snapped her involuntarily back into place, but, undaunted, she crawled forward, dragging the chair behind her and grabbed me by my ankles.

Her mouth, flecked with foam, her eyes wide and wild, her hair matted with perspiration, she begged me, “Take me right here on this floor, now! Give me your strength, your overwhelming tower of pleasure, the cathedral of your love! I need the vast ocean liner of pleasure of which you are the captain! You have no idea how many nights I’ve thought about making love to you. I need you so badly. To hold back from me is to ruin my life. All I ask is for simple union—to be one with you. Let our coming together produce the kind of critical mass bound for an earth-shaking explosion that will release potentials never before imagined.”

I left the room because, as flattering as this sort of attention is, it distorts my life. It cheapens the quality of my existence. I can’t even have a normal relationship anymore. Do I need to disfigure myself? Take an acid bath? Scar my face with a hot poker or a garden trowel?

Once I went to a hospital ward of women who were blind. I did not speak, and yet my presence still created havoc. They leapt from their beds and crashed into walls, fell from their wheelchairs and lay writhing on the floor, reaching in all directions to find me—as though clutching for a life preserver thrown from a deck of a ship. I was forced to hide in a maintenance closet for two hours until I was escorted out on a gurney hidden beneath a pile of laundry to a service exit. But I didn’t escape unscathed because once the orderly, a blonde intern had successfully spirited me into the elevator. He leapt upon me and had to be pried from my body by a hospital administrator who proceeded to kiss me deeply, her hands fluttering like butterflies up and down my chest. I fled with my clothes in tatters.

Sometimes when I come home to my apartment, I look out and see rows of people in the building across the way with binoculars, telescopes, video cameras, night-vision enhancers and parabolic microphones pointed in my direction. As soon as they see me, they become instantly animated. Can you imagine what it’s like to see naked men and women dancing seductively and gesturing obscenely at you from their windows? Do you have any idea how awful this is? How my life has become a living hell? Oh, God. Why did you curse me with such a gorgeous face, such good health and strength? Why have you given me so many admirable qualities? You test my faith on a daily basis. These gifts are unendurable. If only you could restore me as someone else—a slightly overweight, plain, balding, middle-aged man needing dental work with a mild skin condition and a post-nasal drip. A man of average intelligence, an indifferent lover with minor, but nonetheless imminently pressing financial problems.

For awhile, I had my face bandaged as though I had been a victim of a terrible fire. I wore aviator glasses over the mummy-like gauze around my head, and gloves so that people wouldn’t see the refinement of my hands, and stuck a pillow beneath my shirt in order to suggest I had a protruding gut and wore an unkempt white wig and affected a limp, and walked with a cane. And yet, in spite of that, I radiated an invisible energy I couldn’t disguise and was set upon by a crowd of strangers in the street who piled on top of me, kissing and hugging and caressing me. It’s awful. It’s demeaning. It’s as though people were handing an object—not a human being. Which I am.

I am a person. I am somebody. I am me.

I feel as though I must flee. Hide myself, turn off the light. Pull the covers over my head and curl up in a fetal position in the attic because I simply cannot go on any longer. It’s too much to bear.

====================

Posted by: Steve | Sep 22, 2006 4:36:48 PM

Most people think, wrongly, that plagiarism is limited to the act of one person using the exact words of another and then claiming these words to be his/her own.

Plagiarism, when used as an intransitive verb (“I was plagiarized!”), can be the act of "present[ing] as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source." (see websters)

Sooo... from that definition, yeah, it can be said that jed's writing was... well.... plagiarized.

Jed’s product was not new and not original. His piece was clearly derived from a joe frank product. Erm, more than just "inspired by..."

Maybe the accolades to Jed as providing "good shit," and "brilliantly funny stuff," (worthy of a monday column) without acknowledging that the very concept of the idea came from Joe Frank and not himself, seemed a bit off.

(imho, Jed’s missing the point if he thinks it’s all about hyperbole.)

Posted by: sketcher | Sep 22, 2006 7:33:38 PM

I really should just let this go, I realize, but sketcher's comment above....well, I just can't let it go. Take another look at my piece. The only similarity between the two is: hyperbole. Mine mimics (and mocks) a personal ad. Joe's piece tells the story of a man driven mad by the practical effects of his own sexual charisma. Inspired by, sketcher, you....bright fellow, not plagiarized. If you employ your ridiculously broad definition of plagiarized in an irresponsible fashion, as you appear to be doing, you'll come to the conclusion that there's little fiction that's NOT been plagiarized since the Greeks. Think about it.

Posted by: Jed | Sep 23, 2006 3:44:01 PM

Ouch!

Webster's - "Plagiarize:
intransitive verb: to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source"

So let's see.... (stroking chin)

Jed:

"I am sexually adored by all who lay eyes on me, and frequently by those who do not. The blind make clumsy passes, tossing away their canes and leashes so that their hands may be free to caress. ...In fact, women of all ages and descriptions are powerless to withstand my appeal. I have been assaulted by... prepubescent schoolgirls, whose ceaseless screams of delight fill the streets after 3 pm..."

Joe:

"All I know is that my presence in a room is electrifying. I can see desire burning hotly like coals in people’s eyes when they look at me. I can see them undressing me—the smoldering gazes of women, compulsively crossing and uncrossing their legs.. teenaged girls digging their nails into the palms of their hands, their lips parted, their eyes wet with desire.

"Once I went to a hospital ward of women who were blind. I did not speak, and yet my presence still created havoc. They leapt from their beds and crashed into walls, fell from their wheelchairs and lay writhing on the floor, reaching in all directions to find me—as though clutching for a life preserver thrown from a deck of a ship."

Here's some material in Jed’s piece that carries a familiar ring when compared to Joe’s “Great Lives” (also produced in the early 90s)

Jed:

"Animals travel great distances to walk at my side. Dogs lunge and tear at those who would approach without permission. Cats submit their kill for approval, exposing their bellies as evidence of their submission. Birds nest below my window to raise their young in close proximity to my benevolence. Wolves cross mountain ranges to stand sentinel at my door, baying in harmonic fifths to mark my comings and goings. Insects, too, pay me their fealty: Ants construct their colonies at the foot of my stoop, and bees renounce the biological imperative of the hive to fly in formation in my wake.

Joe:

“Even the small furry animals of the woods, the chipmunks, the hedgehogs and moles of the sylvan countryside would flock to him. Standing in the midst of a meadow, he would often find small birds landing on his shoulders. Dogs would come up and nuzzle him. His presence caused flowers to bloom, trees to bear fruit, hedges to become thickly foliated, wounds to heal. Bees led him in a buzzing chorus to the sweetest and most sacred repository of their deep wood honey. Silk worms spontaneously generated exquisite kimonos for his personal use, and koala bears reached down, extending fragrant branches of eucalyptus leaves in order to entice him to remain with them, if only for a moment longer...”

There's more, but why bother? Jed is a very talented and clever writer, but he’s walking a thin line here. Now a bloody tip of the scalp... and a respectful nod to the Greeks, indeed.

A rabid, unapologetic Joe Frank fan
sketcher

Posted by: sketcher | Sep 23, 2006 8:37:08 PM

Speciously done.

I'm troubled still, sketcher. If Joe writes of his character's effect on animals--"furry creatures"--can no one else write of a character's preternatural appeal to animals? What constitutes plagiarism? I mean, sure, we both mention dogs, but mine lunge and tear, where his nuzzle. My bees have forsaken their biological imperative, where his have simply redirected theirs to provision him.

And teenage girls digging their nails into the skin of their hands? Can you justifiably equate that with the ceaseless screams of prepubescent schoolgirls? Speaking of that, since we're dancing on the details, sketcher, I must point out that Leonard does not claim to have been assaulted by prepubescent schoolgirls, despite the implication of your highly selective quoting style. Crones do the assaulting in Leonard's world. If you're going to flay me in a philosophically dishonest way, at least do so without obviously misrepresenting the writing in question.

But for good measure, let's not forget that Joe's character has created his own species of fluorescent porcupine and knows a great deal about subatomic particles, and mine consults with professors of astrophysics about the perturbations of orbiting bodies. That's sort of similar. Plus he mentions Hawking in his piece, and I mention Hawking in mine. That's EXACTLY the same! Oh, and in his piece children commit suicide; in mine, drama aesthetes commit suicide. Suicides in both pieces. Come on! Where's my shame?

In any case, the examples you provide here are facile and tendentious. Take any two similar texts and you can make a bogus argument of plagiarism, most especially when one piece is admittedly, citedly indebted to the other. I don't have the energy to look for a piece of writing that predates Joe's piece and contains similar opportunities to gin up nasty charges of the kind you make, but I haven't a doubt it's out there.

And my goodness, sketcher, I'm a fan of Joe, too. After all, this began because I printed his name at the bottom of "In Search Of," remember?

Posted by: Jed | Sep 24, 2006 1:01:28 PM

Jed, you protest too much.

Narratives have been ripped off forever.

“West Side Story” was “Romeo and Juliet” and no one complained. “Apocalypse Now” gave a tip of the bloody scalp to “Heart of Darkness.” No big deal. The Beastie Boys sampled from Led Zeppelin who stole from Robert Johnson and it was new and cool music. OJ ripped off Othello.

However, the voices were different. The voice you used was very recognizable. I don’t know you, but I do know Joe’s work.

In LA, Joe Frank has been part of our lives for a long time. From ’86 to ’02 every Sat night and Sunday morning Joe’s program soothed and disturbed us through our pathetic, tragic and sometimes joyous lives. All my 3qd friends in LA have commented on the profound similarity of your piece and Joe’s work. I thought high school creative writing class writing taught you to find your own voice. Are classes in imitation writing offered?

I guess this whole self-referential (or should I say Joe-referential) post-modern thing I don't get. It struck me as NYC intellectual stuff. Being a simple shoe-salesman I don't get such matters.

I’d like to hear impassioned defenses from Assad and Abbas on exactly why Jed’s writing is such a “brilliant bit of satire” and why “Jed, you're the greatest.” What’s the big improvement over Joe’s? What’s new about it? Ohhh… it’s a personal ad.

Why, yes!

Go ahead Abbas, make my day.

Jed, perhaps you might improve as a writer if you find a more personal voice. From inside sources who wish to remain confidential: in early September, Jed Palmer sent an email to JoeFrank.com. Apparently, he heard Joe on WNYC - didn't catch the name of the show and described the segment he was interested in. It was "Lover Man" and he purchased it in early September.

Interesting that shortly after Jed received it, he posted his piece on 3qd.

It is obvious you admire Joe's work. We all do.

But, bro, there's no other Joe - thank God - and you are better off being yourself.

Best,
Steve.

Posted by: Steve Anker | Sep 25, 2006 2:23:03 AM

Clearly, Jed was inspired by Joe Frank to write his own riff on Joe's piece, in his own very distinct voice, and clearly stated that in his piece. This is a tribute, not plagiarism, and Jed has repeatedly said that he himself is a fan of Joe Frank's. (In fact he just sent me Joe's CD, which I haven't had a chance to listen to because I am in Los Angeles.)

By the way, Jed has a very well-developed (and sui generis) voice of his own, which you can get a sense of by looking at any or all of his various essays for 3QD here.

Can we just let this go now?

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Sep 25, 2006 2:17:52 PM

Steven,

Talk about ouch! Rock on.

Abbas,

Thank you for that defense. You're a good man.

Steven,

I did indeed order Joe's CD--Lover Man (not "The Loved One," for the last goddamn time). But we've already established my familiarity with Joe's piece, haven't we? Actually, what happened is that I heard Joe's piece on WNYC, and wrote my piece about a month afterwards (long before I got Joe's CD, and long before I posted mine on 3QD: go ahead and ask Abbas about it when you have dinner). I must disagree about the tone of it. It's really quite different, and maybe you should read it again, because I think you'll agree. It IS a personal ad, and Leonard ain't Joe (neither am I). And, really, to echo myself and Abbas, I CITED JOE FRANK!

That said, when I DID get Joe's CD, I was stunned. Not because I copied his work, but because there were bizarro (and insignificant) parallels between them: dogs, bees, blind people and Stephen Hawking. Note that each one of these was used in my piece in a substantially different style and/or context (not to mention different language--dare I say better language) from its usage in Joe's piece (with the possible exception of blind people--but who the f*ck cares about the blind? Just kidding, all you cute sightless folks out there--what are you doing on 3QD, anyway?). Joe's piece really IS strictly about a guy with overwhelming sexual charisma, and mine really IS about a fantastically accomplished hardcore loser (or a hardcore loser who likes to advertise himself as fantastically accomplished). I don't protest too much, Steven; I tell the truth.

But let's get down to it: I don't plagiarize. In all seriousness. That's my last word on this.

Or rather, my second to last word: Steven, I got a call from Margy tonight, asking why she was getting email from you about me. Listen, man, why don't you just ask me out on a date and stop making eyes at me. (I'm already attached. Sorry.)

Yours (not really),

Jed.

Posted by: Jed | Sep 26, 2006 12:47:33 AM

Gosh Jed,

I'm not the only person who feels you borrowed a little too heavily for your piece to be considered uniquely brilliant. Even Abbas, a good and decent friend of yours, who defended you, acknowledged that your comic essay was a "riff" on Joe's work. But you just keep on repeating the same tired and absurd argument that your writing was in no way similar to Joe's, while adding, in an act of bizarre self-aggrandizement, that yours was actually the superior piece of writing. You just keep on digging yourself deeper down the rabbit hole. Also, your reference to the "cute" blind wasn't funny, it was mean-spirited and perverse.

And, by the way, Joe often re-used bits from one show to the other, and the segment in question was in both Lover Man and The Loved One. Check it out.

But I must admit you were right about this all coming down to me having eyes for you. Hadn't realized it, but - YES! You are very cute when angry. The wounded animal snarling and licking his wounds is appealing to me. But of course we all know a wounded animal is dangerous-- in this case, weirdly, to itself.

xxoo,
Steve

Posted by: Steve | Sep 27, 2006 10:22:52 AM

Hi Steven (and whoever else has so little to do they're reading this tedious exchange),

I want you to know I have many blind friends, and they all, every one of them, laughed their asses off at my clever little quip.

Yes, Steven, I did riff on Joe's piece. I thought we had established that already. Inspired by. That's why I posted his name and tipped my scalp (as opposed to my hat) to him.

And, on second thought, I must admit that some of Joe's words are nonpareil: fluorescent porcupines? Please. Not even I can outdo that. It's classic.

Jed.

Posted by: Jed | Sep 27, 2006 11:50:51 AM

To use to free dating sites are the better manner to obtain familiar with this special one someone. Naturally, after having stopwatch a little you will need to ask that dating online of the sites out for a true date, but before that, you obtained the knowledge virtue the person, even before you have met.For your more information:http://ping.fm/0Aoa5

Posted by: Diane Jbabin | Apr 7, 2010 5:52:53 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Our Science Prize

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Hamid on Abandon all hope, ye who enter this thread

Rebekah on Only Philosophers Go to Hell

Adrian Morgan on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Ruchira on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Ruchira on Just Herself

matt on Friday Poem

Stefan on Questioning Willusionism

Saba R. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Faisal K. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

Anand Manikutty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Sandra on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

DAS on Questioning Willusionism

Raza on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

DAS on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

John Ballard on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

Chris Gudmann on How Bad Is It?

Cormac O Rafferty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

ajith on Science is Not About Certainty: A Philosophy of Physics

Ralston McTodd on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed