| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS | MONDAY COLUMNS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Years of Bullets, Years of Lead | Main | Eating Our Popcorn While We Weep »

September 11, 2006

Brief Reflections on 9/11

Abbas Raza:

Would you say a little bit by way of reflections on September 11 five years later?

Akeel Bilgrami:

It's hard to say anything about September 11 that hasn't been said before, but some things need to be said again and again, so I am glad you've asked me this. In the first few months after that morning, I, like most other people, spoke an awful lot to friends and acquaintances about how we ought to understand that extraordinary atrocity. The great and spontaneous feelings of sympathy for the victims we all felt were expressed in words, in donations, in trips down to the devastated region to keep small shops and eating places going…. But after some months, I began to notice that many people, even including close friends, were quite incapable (actually that is the wrong word, I should say ‘unwilling’ since these are not helpless tendencies) of showing any parallel sympathy for the very much larger number of people being bombed and killed in Afghanistan --a far greater wrong because that invasion amounted to the virtually total destruction of an already parched and hungry nation. Quite apart from the moral disappointment one feels about this, one can take this chance to reflect (since that is what you asked me to do) in a more general way about our insensitivity to the suffering of people who are not in the immediate vicinity.

Perhaps the first thing to notice about ourselves is that we have tended to respond to September 11 or to the terrorist actions in London and other parts of the world, by simply saying that they are so atrocious and unpardonable that they could not be motivated by any serious political motives or any genuine grievance. But when this is not just too quick and reactive, it is at best obtuse and (perhaps more correctly) at worst, self-serving. The words on the lips of terrorists which complain of the American government's actions in various parts of the world cannot be wholly beside the point and it is our responsibility to pay attention to them, even as we rightly condemn the terrorist acts as unpardonable. The fact is that the words of complaint and criticism on the lips of terrorists are on the lips of many millions of more people on the street, who are not terrorists at all, but ordinary Muslims who have no great love for the terrorists and in fact would be deeply opposed to them but for the fact that they feel that to be critical of them would be letting the side down and capitulating to America’s direct and indirect state- terrorist actions towards their own people for decades.

Akeel Bilgrami is the Johnsonian Professor of Philosophy, and Director of the Heyman Center for the Humanties at Columbia University.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:24 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/6004453

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brief Reflections on 9/11:

Comments

What was most needed then and what is most needed now is a clear definition of terrorism. Are those who committed the atrocious and unpardonable attack on September 11, 2001 and unleashed upon the world the horror that followed and continues in its aftermath terrorists? Yes. Are those who took advantage of the attacks to unleash further horrors---terrorists? Yes. Right? Yes? What is the definition--someone please help. I invite your readers to craft a viable definition. Without a definition there are easy targets for blame based on ethnicity, religion and region. Without a definition--the innocent will continue to suffer. I do not think there is any dilemma in any decent person's mind on what is terrorism and who is a terrorist. I have not met a single person regardless of race or religion---who hesitates to condemn the killing of innocent people. I do not think any decent person chooses sides when innocent civilians are killed. All those who commit violence against the innocent and unleash terror--are terrorists.

Posted by: maniza | Sep 11, 2006 1:45:47 PM

Over the past 5 years I (age 43) have made it a point to dig deeply into the facts of American history. With Prof. Chomsky as my guide. A thousand doors have opened along the way. Behind each one is a revelation about this president or that war (secret or otherwise). About the propaganda that we all, as native born Americans, have had to chug since grade school. Ours is a terribly spotty history and we have all been taught to ignore those damned spots. In fact it has been drilled into our heads to look straight ahead, keep moving...nothing here to look at. Unfortunately most of the people I am in contact with, daily, continue in this vein, content. After all, the president instructed us, after 9/11, to go shopping. I am afraid most of the population obeyed his command. Meanwhile, our government, intent on expansion, as has always been the case, continues on without any regard for future attacks. They simply don't care! And neither do we! Until it happens again. And then its shock and grieve and rhapsodizing time again. And on and on it goes. How do we get our fellow citizens to understand their own history? To even pay attention to it!?! Apparently only a relative few of us understood what it meant to get clubbed in our ignorant heads with the 2X4 of reality.

Posted by: Christian Hargrove | Sep 13, 2006 3:18:13 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed

Help 3 Quarks Daily

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD ADVERTISING



Please Visit Wikio

  • Wikio
  • Wikio Shopping
  • LCD Monitor
  • LCD TV
  • Recent Comments

    Jesse on literary science?

    chris on Elise & Me: A Tale of Extreme Optical Seduction

    yaqoob pasha on Burqa ban!

    Elatia Harris on literary science?

    OT on Elise & Me: A Tale of Extreme Optical Seduction

    fgh on Physicists could soon be creating black holes in the laboratory

    Philip Graham on literary science?

    Ulle V. Holt on Elise & Me: A Tale of Extreme Optical Seduction

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Are Black Holes Two-Way Streets?

    Felix E F Larocca MD on After Guantánamo

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Hauser and Morris on Science and Morality

    Pete Chapman on Are Black Holes Two-Way Streets?

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Are Saint-Simonians Responsible for Modernity

    J on Are Black Holes Two-Way Streets?

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Jennifer Ouellete's Top Ten at the World Science Festival

    JonJ on Are Black Holes Two-Way Streets?

    C. M. R. on literary science?

    Jared on literary science?

    Bilal on Friday Poem

    Transleitor on literary science?

    Mike on literary science?

    Chris Schoen on literary science?

    Mike on literary science?

    Dave on Structured Procrastination

    reader on literary science?

    Acclaim For 3QD

    Best Non-European Weblog Winner


    Best Group Blog and Blog Most Deserving of Wider Attention Finalist


    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed