| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Why doesn't America believe in evolution? | Main | Learning from Its Mistakes »

August 19, 2006

'Electron-spin' trick boosts quantum computing

From New Scientist:

Dn97681_250A new silicon chip capable of manipulating the spin of a single electron could ultimately allow futuristic quantum computers to be built using conventional electronic technology, researchers say.

A quantum bit, or "qubit", is analogous the bits used in conventional computers. But, instead of simply switching between two states, representing "0" and "1", quantum physics permits a qubit to exist in more than one state simultaneously, until its state is measured.

This means quantum computers can essentially perform multiple calculations at once, giving them the potential to be exponentially more powerful than conventional computers.

Researchers have previously developed rudimentary quantum computers by exploiting exotic phenomena to generate qubits. Two of the most sophisticated methods involve using ions trapped in magnetic fields and electrons in superconducting circuits. However, both approaches are far more complicated than making the chips that power conventional computers.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 01:16 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834e0071a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Electron-spin' trick boosts quantum computing:

Comments

Unfortunately though, the less electrons one uses to store data, the more likely errors will occur.

Today’s memory and logic chips are, at the very least, utilizing tens of thousands of electrons to signify whether a ‘bit’ is a 0 or a 1. It’s very unlikely that they’ll all randomly appear / disappear or tunnel away at the same time ( though it can happen ).

When relying on just one electron however, the chances of a random error occurring are very high. Single fundamental particles pop in and out of existence and flip states all the time. So, unless the logic architecture is radically re-deigned to be ‘error proof ’ ie. ‘error correcting’ ( and Richard Feynman reckoned that it’s possible ) then it seems to me that the 'one electron' logic elements will be essentially useless.

That’s the way I see it anyway. Am I wrong ?

Posted by: martin g | Aug 19, 2006 2:00:04 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

giotto on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

David Schneider on the consititution as work of art

fred lapides on unsticking the conservative brain

J. Hawkins on Happy Bastille Day

Elatia Harris on Happy Bastille Day

Manas Shaikh on 'What's exciting is that writing has become a weapon'

fred lapides on The Recession Is Over!

Carlos on A Patchwork Mind: How Your Parents' Genes Shape Your Brain

Karthik on India, China and the polemics of the East

Elatia Harris on The Israeli thought-police is here

Lambness on A Patchwork Mind: How Your Parents' Genes Shape Your Brain

Fill on A Patchwork Mind: How Your Parents' Genes Shape Your Brain

Lambness on A Patchwork Mind: How Your Parents' Genes Shape Your Brain

Justin on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

Cyrus Hall on The Israeli thought-police is here

Carlos on The Israeli thought-police is here

Richard Sweeton on A Patchwork Mind: How Your Parents' Genes Shape Your Brain

Cyrus Hall on The Israeli thought-police is here

Andrew on A Patchwork Mind: How Your Parents' Genes Shape Your Brain

aguy109 on The Israeli thought-police is here

Daniel Rourke on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

Dave Ranning on India, China and the polemics of the East

Bob on The Israeli thought-police is here

Louise Gordon on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

Elatia Harris on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed