August 19, 2006
'Electron-spin' trick boosts quantum computing
From New Scientist:
A new silicon chip capable of manipulating the spin of a single electron could ultimately allow futuristic quantum computers to be built using conventional electronic technology, researchers say.
A quantum bit, or "qubit", is analogous the bits used in conventional computers. But, instead of simply switching between two states, representing "0" and "1", quantum physics permits a qubit to exist in more than one state simultaneously, until its state is measured.
This means quantum computers can essentially perform multiple calculations at once, giving them the potential to be exponentially more powerful than conventional computers.
Researchers have previously developed rudimentary quantum computers by exploiting exotic phenomena to generate qubits. Two of the most sophisticated methods involve using ions trapped in magnetic fields and electrons in superconducting circuits. However, both approaches are far more complicated than making the chips that power conventional computers.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 01:16 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834e0071a69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Electron-spin' trick boosts quantum computing:






Comments
Unfortunately though, the less electrons one uses to store data, the more likely errors will occur.
Today’s memory and logic chips are, at the very least, utilizing tens of thousands of electrons to signify whether a ‘bit’ is a 0 or a 1. It’s very unlikely that they’ll all randomly appear / disappear or tunnel away at the same time ( though it can happen ).
When relying on just one electron however, the chances of a random error occurring are very high. Single fundamental particles pop in and out of existence and flip states all the time. So, unless the logic architecture is radically re-deigned to be ‘error proof ’ ie. ‘error correcting’ ( and Richard Feynman reckoned that it’s possible ) then it seems to me that the 'one electron' logic elements will be essentially useless.
That’s the way I see it anyway. Am I wrong ?
Posted by: martin g | Aug 19, 2006 2:00:04 PM
Post a comment