July 16, 2006
Our political predilections are a product of unconscious confirmation bias
Michael Shermer in Scientific American:
During the run-up to the 2004 presidential election, while undergoing an fMRI bran scan, 30 men--half self-described as "strong" Republicans and half as "strong" Democrats--were tasked with assessing statements by both George W. Bush and John Kerry in which the candidates clearly contradicted themselves. Not surprisingly, in their assessments Republican subjects were as critical of Kerry as Democratic subjects were of Bush, yet both let their own candidate off the hook.
The neuroimaging results, however, revealed that the part of the brain most associated with reasoning--the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex--was quiescent. Most active were the orbital frontal cortex, which is involved in the processing of emotions; the anterior cingulate, which is associated with conflict resolution; the posterior cingulate, which is concerned with making judgments about moral accountability; and--once subjects had arrived at a conclusion that made them emotionally comfortable--the ventral striatum, which is related to reward and pleasure.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 05:39 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834d7b79469e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Our political predilections are a product of unconscious confirmation bias:









Comments
We need to bring back jesters.
Posted by: beajerry | Jul 17, 2006 10:20:19 AM
It's much more likely that unconscious (or is it just not acknowledged publicly?) confirmation bias is the result of polical predilections.
Blaming everything on "bias" simply leaves political differences floating in mid-air as to why they exist.
And what could be meant by calling predilections "bias"? As opposed to what? The Absolute Truth that Shermer possesses?
Posted by: mcd | Jul 17, 2006 4:18:25 PM
Not surprising really. Maybe if one had a more diverse party spread reflecting the issues important to the population, like in European countries, there wouldn't be this "either-or" situation.
I don't think you should judge by the occasional goofup, either. A more interesting experiment could be to let a neutral narrator read statements from each of these regarding important issues (so you couldn't make up your mind because you recognize Your Leader's Voice), and see what the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has to say about them.
Posted by: maximilion | Jul 17, 2006 5:57:18 PM
Post a comment