| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« A Nuclear Renaissance? | Main | Rwanda, 12 Years After the Horror »

July 16, 2006

Our political predilections are a product of unconscious confirmation bias

Michael Shermer in Scientific American:

During the run-up to the 2004 presidential election, while undergoing an fMRI bran scan, 30 men--half self-described as "strong" Republicans and half as "strong" Democrats--were tasked with assessing statements by both George W. Bush and John Kerry in which the candidates clearly contradicted themselves. Not surprisingly, in their assessments Republican subjects were as critical of Kerry as Democratic subjects were of Bush, yet both let their own candidate off the hook.

The neuroimaging results, however, revealed that the part of the brain most associated with reasoning--the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex--was quiescent. Most active were the orbital frontal cortex, which is involved in the processing of emotions; the anterior cingulate, which is associated with conflict resolution; the posterior cingulate, which is concerned with making judgments about moral accountability; and--once subjects had arrived at a conclusion that made them emotionally comfortable--the ventral striatum, which is related to reward and pleasure.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 05:39 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834d7b79469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Our political predilections are a product of unconscious confirmation bias:

Comments

We need to bring back jesters.

Posted by: beajerry | Jul 17, 2006 10:20:19 AM

It's much more likely that unconscious (or is it just not acknowledged publicly?) confirmation bias is the result of polical predilections.

Blaming everything on "bias" simply leaves political differences floating in mid-air as to why they exist.
And what could be meant by calling predilections "bias"? As opposed to what? The Absolute Truth that Shermer possesses?

Posted by: mcd | Jul 17, 2006 4:18:25 PM

Not surprising really. Maybe if one had a more diverse party spread reflecting the issues important to the population, like in European countries, there wouldn't be this "either-or" situation.

I don't think you should judge by the occasional goofup, either. A more interesting experiment could be to let a neutral narrator read statements from each of these regarding important issues (so you couldn't make up your mind because you recognize Your Leader's Voice), and see what the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has to say about them.

Posted by: maximilion | Jul 17, 2006 5:57:18 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    aguy109 on The Israeli thought-police is here

    Daniel Rourke on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

    Dave Ranning on India, China and the polemics of the East

    Bob on The Israeli thought-police is here

    Louise Gordon on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

    Elatia Harris on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

    Carlos on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

    Casey on Cooking Up a Pot of Civilization

    Elatia Harris on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Daniel Rourke on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

    Space Toast on India, China and the polemics of the East

    Chris Schoen on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Pete Chapman on Sunday Poem

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Jeff Strabone on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Victoria Nwobodo on Facebook Poetry – Oxymoron or Hamburger-Chain Art?

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Joe Y on Summer time and the eating is easy

    hmmm on Losing the Plot (The Hotel)

    Cyrus Hall on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Louise Gordon on In God's name

    Manisha Verma on India, China and the polemics of the East

    sw on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    J. Hawkins on In God's name

    kerg on The Israeli thought-police is here

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed