April 01, 2006
Singularities and Nightmares
"Options for a coming singularity include self-destruction of civilization, a positive singularity, a negative singularity (machines take over), and retreat into tradition. Our urgent goal: find (and avoid) failure modes, using anticipation (thought experiments) and resiliency -- establishing robust systems that can deal with almost any problem as it arises."
David Brin KurzweilAI.net:
In order to give you pleasant dreams tonight, let me offer a few possibilities about the days that lie ahead—changes that may occur within the next twenty or so years, roughly a single human generation. Possibilities that are taken seriously by some of today's best minds. Potential transformations of human life on Earth and, perhaps, even what it means to be human.
For example, what if biologists and organic chemists manage to do to their laboratories the same thing that cyberneticists did to computers? Shrinking their vast biochemical labs from building-sized behemoths down to units that are utterly compact, making them smaller, cheaper, and more powerful than anyone imagined. Isn't that what happened to those gigantic computers of yesteryear? Until, today, your pocket cell phone contains as much processing power and sophistication as NASA owned during the moon shots. People who foresaw this change were able to ride this technological wave. Some of them made a lot of money.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 07:03 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834b51aa669e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Singularities and Nightmares:





Comments
So much to call BS on, so little time.
Poorly understood technologies are always extremely oversold; and Kurzweil oversells even more. Such overselling is short sighted and stupid because it wrongly gives the impression that the technologies are not materializing, when they are infact producing a host of less revolutionary developments.
Both grand deams and disturbing nightmares about nanotech represent fundamental lack of understanding of the stomach, i.e. containment of chemical reactions. No one who worries about "grey goo" has the foggiest clue what they are talking about.
Posted by: Jeff Burdges | Apr 2, 2006 11:53:32 AM
Jeff, the singularity idea is not fundamentally about nanotech, it's about Moore's law and the possibility of eventually creating a human-level a.i. (perhaps by creating a detailed simulation of a real human brain rather than building one from scratch). Of course it is quite possible that Moore's law will break down and we will never have sufficient computing power to create such an intelligence, but this is independent of the question of whether nanotechnology will ever be possible.
Posted by: Jesse M. | Apr 2, 2006 2:34:14 PM
Sure, I agree & am a transhumanist myself. Hence my distaste for people placing sooo much weight on a technology whose contributions will remain minor for some time yet.
Also, why depend on an AI at all? Sure, human genetic enhancement has limits, but it'll help quite a bit. And one can always simply learn how to build "Beowolf clusters of humans." Surely much much simpler than building an AI. And hence doable much much sooner.
Posted by: Jeff | Apr 18, 2006 9:27:37 AM
Sure, I agree & am a transhumanist myself. Hence my distaste for people placing sooo much weight on a technology whose contributions will remain minor for some time yet.
Also, why depend on an AI at all? Sure, human genetic enhancement has limits, but it'll help quite a bit. And one can always simply learn how to build "Beowolf clusters of humans." Surely much much simpler than building an AI. And hence doable much much sooner.
Posted by: Jeff | Apr 18, 2006 9:28:16 AM
Post a comment