| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Looking for troubles | Main | The Marketplace of Perceptions »

March 01, 2006

The stigma of smoking

"As the smoker has become a pariah, sufferers from lung cancer have become the lepers of the twenty-first century."

Dr. Michael Fitzpatrick in Spiked:

The advert features a young mother, clearly in the terminal stages of lung cancer, who expresses her feelings of guilt and remorse that a cancer caused by her own smoking will soon take her away from her children. In turn, her daughter expresses her anger and grief at the fact that her mother is expected to die shortly as a result of a disease resulting from her smoking. This advert is clearly designed to make parents who smoke feel guilty - and to make children of parents who smoke feel angry. Its objective is to use children as an instrument of the campaign to deter adults from smoking...

It is a sign of the times that there has been no storm of protest over the increasingly manipulative and moralistic character of anti-smoking propaganda. In the crusade to reduce mortality from smoking it is considered legitimate to exploit the deepest fears of parents and children. While the law seeks to prohibit smoking in public, the new anti-smoking advert seeks to proscribe it in the private sphere, fomenting domestic strife to achieve this objective. At a time when a wide range of civil liberties are under threat it is alarming that the strategy of using children to police their parents' behaviour - reminiscent of totalitarian regimes - provokes so little public disquiet.

The immediate casualties of the war on smoking are people with lung cancer and other smoking-related diseases.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 04:27 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834ad802269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The stigma of smoking:

Comments

"reminiscent of totalitarian regimes " What nonsense! Children have a right to breath clean air at home and to be concerned about their parents' health. My kids helped stop their mum from smoking, good for them! Smokers should definitely be stigmatized.
Maybe Dr. Fitzpatrick is an "agent provocateur" from the anti-smoking lobby, who is deliberately trying to make smokers look ridiculous, by waiving red herrings.

Posted by: aguy109 | Mar 1, 2006 6:49:42 PM

If smokers just went away and died on their own, this would make sense. Sadly their habit takes others with them.
Cancer cures smoking.

Posted by: Nosmo King | Mar 2, 2006 6:05:14 AM

smoking is dumb. i still smoke. it's hard to quit, but i am trying.

that said, smoking-related diseases don't just strike smokers. a friend of mine who never smoked suffered from lung cancer. another suffered from mouth cancer. my grandfather was a nonsmoker who suffered from chronic pulmonary obstruction.

stigmatize smokers if you must, but don't rush to assume everyone with an ailment generally associated with smoking brought it upon themselves. you can't always reason backwards from someone's current condition in order to divine the choices they made in their lives.

Posted by: liz | Mar 2, 2006 10:49:28 AM

In my view, smokers are worse than people who perpetually fart in public. Not only do they not control a personal habit that creates bad smells, but they insist on inflicting health problems on others.

That being said, people are free to smoke and kill themselves as long as they are prevented from taking other people with them. That's why I support things like smoke-free workplaces and smoke-free bars, as long as smoking clubs can form where smoking is tolerated.

liz, many non-smokers have lung cancer because they worked in smoke-filled locations. Bartenders and waitresses in particular suffer from this.

Posted by: Hektor Bim | Mar 2, 2006 3:14:24 PM

i know. all i'm saying is that smoking should carry the stigma, not lung cancer.

Posted by: liz | Mar 2, 2006 4:58:13 PM

Liz, I think smoking is dumb ONLY if you are unaware of its risks. What many non-smokers overlook in their self-righteous and contemtuously condescending vision of smokers (seen solely as addicts) is that smoking is a great PLEASURE for smokers. If a smoker is willing to put with the risk for the sake of this pleasure, why shouldn't she? I don't ride a motorcycle because they are very dangerous, but I don't tell other people not to.

Before someone starts yelling about how that is a bad analogy because riding a motorcycle doesn't endanger OTHER people's health, let me say that yes, it is probably good that smoking is banned in public enclosed spaces.

On the other hand, I constantly have to breath in the exhaust fumes and carbon monoxide of people who choose to drive in Manhattan rather than take the subway, etc., etc. There's always a tradeoff between what might hurt an individual and what society wants as a whole.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Mar 2, 2006 5:30:25 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Abbas Raza on Bill Gates Puts Richard Feynman Lectures Online

Cyrus Hall on Bill Gates Puts Richard Feynman Lectures Online

Lloyd Mintern on Thursday Poem

David Schneider on Thursday Poem

icy on Feynman: Take the world from another point of view

Kenneth on Thursday Poem

Luke Lea on in the hedge with the fox

Carlos on Want to keep your wallet? Carry a baby picture

Mujib on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

DRK on Want to keep your wallet? Carry a baby picture

Elatia Harris on Want to keep your wallet? Carry a baby picture

jlo on Are the "New Atheists" Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

D on Want to keep your wallet? Carry a baby picture

Edward Mycue on in the hedge with the fox

fred lapides on Elephants Don't Always Keep it in the Family

Dubus on Are the "New Atheists" Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

J. Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

maniza on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Fawad on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Fawad on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

J. Hawkins on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

falcon on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Carlos on Thursday Poem

Jonathan on HOW POLITENESS EVOLVED


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed