March 10, 2006
The Marketplace of Perceptions
From Harvard Magazine:
Like all revolutions in thought, this one began with anomalies, strange facts, odd observations that the prevailing wisdom could not explain. Casino gamblers, for instance, are willing to keep betting even while expecting to lose. People say they want to save for retirement, eat better, start exercising, quit smoking—and they mean it—but they do no such things. Victims who feel they’ve been treated poorly exact their revenge, though doing so hurts their own interests.
Such perverse facts are a direct affront to the standard model of the human actor—Economic Man—that classical and neoclassical economics have used as a foundation for decades, if not centuries. Economic Man makes logical, rational, self-interested decisions that weigh costs against benefits and maximize value and profit to himself. Economic Man is an intelligent, analytic, selfish creature who has perfect self-regulation in pursuit of his future goals and is unswayed by bodily states and feelings. And Economic Man is a marvelously convenient pawn for building academic theories. But Economic Man has one fatal flaw: he does not exist.
When we turn to actual human beings, we find, instead of robot-like logic, all manner of irrational, self-sabotaging, and even altruistic behavior.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 07:32 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/4424644
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Marketplace of Perceptions:






Comments
This was submitted earlier
I'm glad that that the editors too are overwhelmed by the deluge of quality articles ;)
Posted by: Zai | Mar 10, 2006 11:17:28 AM
The whole article is well worth reading, though I doubt the premise that economists have really assumed that consumers are totally logical "robots".
In the evolutionary view of things, it is generally believed that most of the evolution of the human brain occurred during the long 'hunter/gatherer/scavenger' period, during which the storability of food was minimal and Man was largely preoccupied by short term issues, like finding the next meal. The domestication of cattle and goats, just a few thousand years ago, meant that food could be 'stored' on the hoof and wealth could be accumulated, so long–term planning and thinking became more important, but the basic instincts would still have favored short term gains and immediate gratification over careful planning and delayed gratification. As the article implies, these dilemmas have stayed with us to this day.
Posted by: aguy109 | Mar 11, 2006 5:27:56 PM
Post a comment