March 27, 2006
Sojourns: True Crime
An eighteen-year old girl drinks heavily at a bar. She leaves with three boys about her age. No one ever sees her again. Her body is never found. Such is the ordinary stuff of crime across the world: a victim and her suspects caught in a prosaic mixture of sex and violence.
Add to that a few elements I've left out of my description, however, and we have the stuff of media sensation and obsessive interest: A blond American girl goes to Aruba to celebrate her high school graduation. The night before she is to fly back, she drinks heavily at a local bar. She gets in a car with three locals. She is not at the airport the next morning. Her body is never found.
The facts of the crime remain the same. The temper of the response alters dramatically.
Almost a year later, Natalee Holloway still commands our attention. Small developments in the case are breaking news. The characters are all well known: the grieving and irate mother; the coddled major suspect; the various local authorities. Several have given long interviews on national television; all have lawyers, perhaps one or two have secured agents. As with the runaway bride and Hurricane Katrina, the story itself has become a story, an occasion for the media to examine the way in which it packages and serves up the news. Why do we care about one girl's disappearance when so much of graver consequence happens all the time? Why Natalee Holloway?
One answer to this question has been the much-discussed "missing white girl syndrome." A blond and attractive teenager disappears and all sorts of conscious and unconscious associations are made. Natalee Holloway swiftly turns from a particular individual, with thoughts and desires and experiences of her own, to an iconic vision of American girlhood: blond, young, pretty, and almost certainly dead. Like many things, our icons are easier to see in their twilight. Natalee is somehow blonder in repose. And so the story isn't really about one person's disappearance. It is about everything that is conventionally American thrown into horrible distress, apple pie tossed to the wolves.
Lurking below the interest in iconic American girlhood is something darker and less easy to talk about, at least on prime time cable. Natalee may or may not have been raped. She may or may not have had consensual sex with one, two, or three boys. One of them licked Jello shots off her stomach earlier in the evening. This much is known. She left a tourist bar named "Carlos 'n Charlie's" at around 1:30 am on May 30th, 2005. Her last recorded act was to get into a car with the three suspects. After that, we are left to our bleakest imaginations. In other words, the Natalee story lingers in part because of its strong undercurrent of sex and mayhem.
Natalee's blondness and our penchant for erotic mayhem are not so separate. They are two sides of the media frenzy that has become the Natalee Holloway story. We turn girls into icons and then like to think of them in the most degraded of circumstances. Even a casual observer of trends in recent pornography knows this all too well. Prurience and voyeurism are intrinsic to this case and central to its apparently unending allure. Our white girl has not simply gone missing. She is now at the dimmer reaches of what we can speak about and what we can imagine. The combination is toxic and intoxicating.
To these associations, I would add one more element that is essential to the Natalee phenomenon. The crime remains without a body, some of the most basic facts available only through conjecture and inference. This way it is both a perfect and flawed crime story. The same public that watches Greta Van Susteren incessantly dissect the case on On the Record tunes in regularly to CSI, where virtuoso experts discover incriminating evidence on or about the corpses of victims. But Natalee's body is still out of reach of criminology and forensic science. Nothing is resolved or certain. Natalie did or did not have sex, was or was not raped, died by accident or met foul play. According to the latest version of events, she may have expired from an overdose of alcohol and drugs. Without a body, there is no way to know for sure.
Natalee still holds her secrets. Irresolution and uncertainty allow for the infinite variety of crime-narratives to play themselves out—among talking heads, in our imaginations. Yet irresolution and uncertainty also frustrate an audience that expects closure. We have grown used to bodies that talk to the police and doctors and scientists. The Natalee Holloway story places her body at the center of events—she was or was not inebriated, did or did not have sex, met or did not meet with violence—yet renders it disturbingly mute.
We may never hear Natalie speak. What we know is this. An eighteen-year old girl drank heavily at a bar. She left with three boys about her age. No one saw her again. Her body has yet to be found.
Posted by Jonathan Kramnick at 12:34 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d8342ce5cf53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sojourns: True Crime:






















Comments
i think the fact that she is a "missing rich girl" would account more for the fact that there's still so much hoopla over her disappearance. i wonder why people haven't clued in to the fact that class is the sole factor behind news items such as this. i think coverage of this story -- from any angle -- really needs to be retired soon. that said, i'm glad that you chose to report on an aspect of holloway's character that the average american simpleton would rather ignore.
Posted by: geroge | Mar 27, 2006 12:53:01 AM
It reminds me so much of "Twin Peaks" and the story around Laura Palmer.
Posted by: Mikke | Mar 27, 2006 9:25:22 AM
Good post! Nicely done.
Posted by: beajerry | Mar 27, 2006 12:14:47 PM
Interesting stuff, as usual, Jonathan. I have no evidence for this except for personal and anecdotal experience, but it seems that women are even more obsessed with stories like this than men. While flipping through channels, I have noticed that the women's channel Lifetime is almost exlusively devoted to programming (movies, documentaries, "based on facts" movies) about women being killed, raped, etc., especially by their boyfriends and husbands. What do you think is the deal with that?
Posted by: Abbas Raza | Mar 27, 2006 2:59:52 PM
One issue not mentioned in the article is that of police and government secrecy and corruption. Our system of government has totally failed to deal with these issues at any level of government, local, state or federal.
For example, in Athens, Georgia a young senior at the University of Georgia, art major, Jennifer Lynn Stone, was murdered and sexually assaulted April 23, 1992. A series of investigative reports were published about 3 years later in the local weekly newspaper by an award winning investigative reporter. All evidence indicated a local judge's son was the last person to see her alive and was the main suspect.
Yet, all evidence indicates this suspect was not only not arrested, or DNA tested, although many others were, but not even questioned at all by police! In fact, a local lawyer for the main suspect was reportedly permitted to view her murder file, but the local government went to court several years later when another lawyer made the same verbatim request to see the investigative file and had it declared "state secrets".
To this day, the police department refuses to release any information about the case and claims it is still under "investigation".
All evidence indicates this to be a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice by several police chiefs, county district attorneys, commissioners, judges, lawyers, etc. The case was presented on a national program a few years ago. The head of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation was reported to have said "he has her picture on his desk every day" and invited members of the public to provide information. Yet, when one member of the community with information sought to communicate with them vital information, his telephone calls went unreturned.
The case is similar to the Moxley case in Connecticut, except that many lawyers and judges are involved. Our system is virtually impotent to deal with such situations. We obviously learned nothing from World War II and Nazi, Germany, since our governments at all levels are copies after the Nazi Gestapo and secret police. Secrecy is the enemy of the truth but most Americans choose to put their heads in the sand and permit government to fool them year in and year out. The citizen has obviously lost to corruption in government, police and secret district attorneys offices.
Posted by: Winfield J. Abbe | Mar 27, 2006 7:12:43 PM
Addendum: Today, April 16th 2006, the Aruban authorities announced that they have made an arrest in the case, an acquaintance of the three original suspects with the initials G.V.C. By all accounts, this arrest is of someone who may have been accessory after the fact and therefore able to implicate the perpetrators. The story continues...
Posted by: author | Apr 16, 2006 3:00:23 PM
Post a comment