| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Justin on David Horowitz and the "Academic Bill of Rights" | Main | Their Master's Voice »

February 25, 2006

More on the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Quantum Computer Experiment

From Nature, a more descriptive article on the quantum computer that can solve problems before even running:

A quantum computer is very different from a traditional desktop computer. It uses the laws of quantum mechanics to perform many calculations at once where a conventional computer could do them only one at a time. This drastically cuts the time a quantum computer takes to find the answer.

This is made possible by the fact that quantum objects, such as individual atoms or photons of light, can be placed in 'superposition' states, mixtures of states that are mutually exclusive in everyday objects. A quantum switch, for example, could be simultaneously on and off.

That's the key to quantum computation, because it means that a quantum computer can be placed in a superposition of states where it is running and not running. This leaves an imprint of the 'running' state on the history of the 'not running' state, such that one can look at the latter and determine something about the former.

"Some people like to think of this as two different universes", explains computer scientist Richard Josza of Bristol University in England. In one universe the computer runs, while in a parallel universe it doesn't.

One might say then that the computer does actually run, but in a 'parallel universe'. "So you wouldn't be charged for the cost of running it," says Josza.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:35 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d8342521c453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Quantum Computer Experiment:

Comments

OK, I am not a physicist, and can't pretend to understand this -- but these folks are joking with us, right?

Posted by: SB | Feb 25, 2006 3:44:11 PM

without even turning off my computer I can easily generate a counterfactual statement to the effect that this experiment proves nothing.

T

Posted by: Thomas | Feb 26, 2006 2:24:19 PM

This is no joke, but it IS so unintuitive, that without learning a lot of the math of quantum theory it is almost impossible to understand.

I have asked Sean Carroll (a very well-respected physicist) at Cosmic Variance to explain this to us in as plain language as possible, and he has agreed to do so later in the week. I will post it when it becomes available.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Feb 26, 2006 4:38:22 PM

Oh, thank you!

Posted by: SB | Feb 26, 2006 11:55:14 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Our Science Prize

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Hamid on Abandon all hope, ye who enter this thread

Rebekah on Only Philosophers Go to Hell

Adrian Morgan on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Ruchira on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Ruchira on Just Herself

matt on Friday Poem

Stefan on Questioning Willusionism

Saba R. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Faisal K. on Saadia Toor and "The State of Islam"

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

Anand Manikutty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Sandra on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Raza on Questioning Willusionism

DAS on Questioning Willusionism

Raza on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

DAS on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

John Ballard on Turning Scientific Perplexity into Ordinary Statistical Uncertainty

Chris Gudmann on How Bad Is It?

Cormac O Rafferty on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

Renideo on Should Hate Speech Be Outlawed?

ajith on Science is Not About Certainty: A Philosophy of Physics

Ralston McTodd on The 10 Things Economics Can Tell Us About Happiness

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Julian De Freitas on Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed