| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Einstein on Science and Religion | Main | The architecture of Santiago Calatrava »

October 27, 2005

How Darwin and Einstein replied to letters

Kurt Kleiner in New Scientist:

Both Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein relied on pen, paper, and the postal service to communicate with correspondents around the world. But researchers have now found the pattern of their replies is the same as that of computer users answering email today, with both following the same mathematical formula.

The pattern could reflect some basic biological encoding that shows up in everything from humans at work to birds foraging for food, according to Albert-László Barabási, a physicist at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, US.

In previous work, Barabási looked at how long it took people to answer their email, and found a "bursty" pattern – most emails are answered fairly quickly, but a few sit around for a long time, and some sit around for a very long time.

To describe the pattern, Barabási created a mathematical model in which people prioritise their emails, then respond to the high priority emails quickly and the low-priority emails more slowly. When he crunched the numbers, his model fit the observed results perfectly.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 03:19 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d8345dedf669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Darwin and Einstein replied to letters :

Comments

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

3QD on Facebook

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Darran on The Work of the Moving Image in the Age of its Digital Corruptibility

floundericious on Monday Poem

ringo on The Work of the Moving Image in the Age of its Digital Corruptibility

ed rackley on The Winners of the 3 Quarks Daily 2009 Prize in Philosophy

icastico on Perceptions

Stephen C. Rose on The Work of the Moving Image in the Age of its Digital Corruptibility

J. Hawkins on Don't blow it - good planets are hard to find

Dredd on Don't blow it - good planets are hard to find

J. Hawkins on Sunday Poem

J. H. on Don't blow it - good planets are hard to find

Eli on 10 Muharram, 1431 A.H.

anonymouse on Don't blow it - good planets are hard to find

wedding speech on 13 Things That Don’t Make Sense

michael blim on 10 Muharram, 1431 A.H.

Laura Claridge on 10 Muharram, 1431 A.H.

Dredd on The Work of the Moving Image in the Age of its Digital Corruptibility

Smink tippek on The Work of the Moving Image in the Age of its Digital Corruptibility

Dave Ranning on NOAM CHOMSKY: “Gaza: One Year Later”

Carlos on get the led out

Carlos on Obama steps up rhetoric on Iran

Dave Ranning on NOAM CHOMSKY: “Gaza: One Year Later”

icastico on get the led out

Dave Ranning on Dennis Brutus, 1924-2009

Louise Gordon on Iconography of Karbala

MikeB on Iconography of Karbala

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

See all winners here.

Logos designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed