| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The rise and not so much fall of crack-cocaine | Main | Negotiations 5: A Pure Negativity »

August 08, 2005

Monday Musing: Rocket Man

Redstone20rocket_4 It has never been fully clear to me why rocket science has become such a popular trope for intellectually challenging activity. Brain surgery makes more sense to me as a metaphor (as in, "It ain't brain surgery, you know!") since it is rather obviously very intricate, requires dexterity in addition to knowledge, decades of training, etc. On the other hand, at least on the surface, what could be simpler than a rocket? Take a cylinder, fill it with a flammable material, leave one end open, and set that end on fire. The expanding burning material will escape out the end, pushing the rocket in the opposite direction by Newton's third law. That's it. (A bullet could be considered a small rocket, I suppose.) Moreover, say you are going to the moon in your rocket: all you need to do to calculate the correct trajectories, orbits, etc., is Newtonian mechanics from a few hundred years ago. You needn't worry about electro-magnetic or nuclear forces, just good old gravity. There are no quantum or relativistic effects to be taken into account, no superconductivity, nothing fancy. A bit of chemistry (for the fuel) and classical phycics will do just fine. Of course there's a bit more to it, but it must be the irresistably romantic vision of our sailing starward into space that gives rockets their public fascination, however superficial. (Please, no phallo-Freudian explanations in the comments area.)

Quick, name a famous rocket scientist! Did you think of Robert Goddard? That's good. Yes, Goddard has come to be known as the "father of modern rocketry." Who else? Maybe Wernher von Braun? Yep, he's the German guy responsible for the V1 and V2 rockets 180pxstamprobert_h_goddardbefore eventually settling in the United States and developing many of America's cold war-era ICBMs, so he has a bit of a mixed reputation here, at least morally speaking. (I suppose inspiring Thomas Pynchon to write Gravity's Rainbow also counts as a sort of achievement!) If you can think of any others, you're doing a lot better than most people. Rocket science hasn't made too many individuals famous, the way, say, quantum physics has. There aren't many popular books about it either. So, today, I'm going to give you a third name to remember: Arch Chilton Scurlock.

Arch_chilton_scurlockFull disclosure: for years, one of my dearest friends (and my wife's maid-of-honor at our wedding) has been Margy Scurlock, Arch's youngest daughter, and through her I also knew Arch and his charming wife Nancy. (My wife Margit and I spent our wedding night in Arch's amazingly beautiful suite at the Pierre Hotel in New York City. Thanks again, Margy!) True to the stereotype (despite my puzzlement over it) of rocket scientists, he was one of the brightest, most vivacious, and genuinely interesting men I have met. Not only was Dr. Scurlock personally responsible for some of the most astounding advances in rocketry in the 20th century, he was also a remarkably astute businessman, and has even been called the Bill Gates of his day. But let me try to tell his story chronologically.

Arch Scurlock was born in 1920 in Beaumont, Texas. His father served as the district attorney of Jefferson County. His maternal grandfather was senator Horace Chilton (Dem-Texas), whose own grandfather was Thomas Chilton, anti-Jacksonian congressman from Kentucky in the 1830s. Despite this distinguished political background, Arch found that his own passion was science, and he obtained a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering and physics from UT Austin. He excelled in college, and was even named "best all-around intramural athlete" in his senior year. (He is supposed to have had a "lightning squash game," but I never had a chance to play him. Apparently he wasn't too bad at boxing either.) He went on to MIT and received a master's degree and then a Ph.D. in chemical engineering. I seem to remember that he once told me that he also held a master's degree in meteorology from the University of Chicago. In any case, during WWII, Arch was a Navy meteorologist and also flew reconnaissance missions in the South Pacific.

After the war, Dr. Scurlock joined Engineering Research Associates in Arlington, Virginia. This was a company staffed mainly by cryptographers who had broken the "Purple Cypher," the main Japanese code during the war. William C. Norris, who later founded Control Data Corporation, was also there at the time. The company had a contract from the Office of Naval Research to study ram jets, pulse jets, and solid and liquid propellents. After a short while there, on January 24, 1949, Dr. Scurlock founded the Atlantic Research Corporation (ARC--yes, the first three letters of his name) with $1,000 in capital, and a three-month research contract from Princeton University. ARC would soon become one of the fastest growing science and engineering companies in the world, eventually responsible for the production of dozens of types of rockets (including the Minuteman, the Tomohawk Cruise Missile, and the TOW, Maverick, and Stinger missiles). The company also diversified into very disparate fields, such as producing the inflators for automotive airbags. ARC's main innovations and work, however, was in producing solid rocket fuels. Dr. Scurlock could be called the father of solid rocketry. (The space shuttle, for example, has one liquid fuel tank, and two solid rocket boosters.)

Scurlock_profileSome years ago, Dr. Scurlock invited a few of Margy's friends to the 21 Club for her birthday. Over pre-prandial drinks, I asked him for an example of something interesting that he had discovered in rocketry. He thought about it for a bit, ordered another drink, then with characteristic modesty said, "Many discoveries in science are accidental. You are looking for one thing, and find another. Think of Alexander Fleming's discovery of Penicillin. I'll give you a small example from my field." He then went on to describe one of the ways in which he solved the problem of burn-rates in solid rocket fuel.

Let me now, in turn, try to explain to you what he told me: the total energy stored in the fuel of a rocket is known as its impulse, and is measured in pound-seconds. This means X pounds of thrust delivered for Y seconds. So, for a fuel formulation that delivers 10,000 pound-seconds of impulse, this could mean a thousand pounds of thrust for 10 seconds, or 100 pounds of thrust for 100 seconds, etc. The problem was that the fuel they were working with at the time, something called Arcite, does not burn fast enough to produce the required thrust. In other words, they needed to increase the thrust (pounds) and decrease the burning time (seconds) for Arcite. While thinking about the problem, Dr. Scurlock and others were doing some preliminary measurements of flame temperatures of various propellent formulations in the laboratory. They were using thermocouples (bi-metallic filaments) embedded in the fuel grains to do this. Now, the way that a rocket fuel grain burns is this: once ignited, the flame at the end melts the solid fuel just behind it, which then ignites in turn, melting the fuel behind it, etc. What Dr. Scurlock noticed was, that the fuel was burning faster with the thermocouple wires embedded in it. He immediately realized that if he inserted a wire made of a material which conducts heat well, like copper or silver, say, into the middle of the rocket grain, then this wire will conduct heat from the flame to the material behind it much faster, melting and igniting it. What results is a cone shape, with the point of the cone pointing inwards along the wire toward the unburned fuel. It would look something like this:

Rocket

Notice that while normally the area of the fuel which is burning is a circle at the end with an area of ΠR2, with the embedded wire it is a cone shaped area with a much larger surface. Suppose the cone extends inwards into the fuel to a length twice the diameter of the rocket. Then, in terms of the radius, R, of the rocket cylinder, the surface area of the burning cone shaped area of the fuel would be:

Surface Area = ΠR sqrt (R2 + (2D)2) = ΠR sqrt (R2 + (4R)2) = ΠR sqrt (17R2) = ΠR2 sqrt (17)

Since the square root of 17 is between 4 and 5, the surface area of the fuel that is burning at a given time in this way is 4 to 5 times greater than without the embedded wire. And indeed, after experimenting with various materials and configurations, Dr. Scurlock was able to achieve burn rates five times faster than before, which is what they needed for the Arcite fuel. By the way, the cone is just molded into the fuel grain at the beginning, allowing high thrust right from ...3, 2, 1, ignition. Such are the little breakthroughs and increments with which even rocket science is normally done.

GlobeThe December 5, 1960 issue of U.S. News and World Report reported the upcoming inauguration of JFK, remarking that he "moves into the White House at 43 to replace a president aged 70," and then moved on to note that the young are replacing the old in business as well, like Arch Scurlock, age 40, who "heads the fast-growing Atlantic Research Corporation in Alexandria, Virginia, a major producer of solid fuels for space vehicles." In 1968, Dr. Scurlock went on to form Research Industries, a venture capital firm which invested in small startup companies in the aerospace, defense, and textile industries, including Halifax Corporation, an engineering firm in Virginia. Dr. Scurclock's obituary in the Washington Post notes that "At his death, he was chairman and chief executive of Research Industries and board chairman of Halifax. He had seen Halifax through rough moments, including a scandal in the late 1990s involving a former controller who pleaded guilty to embezzling millions from the company." Arch Chilton Scurlock died on December 9, 2002, aged 82. Knowing how much I admired him, Margy passed along various personal items of his to me as mementos, including the hand-tailored blue suit he is wearing in the profile picture above (by a weird coincidence, we happened to be the exact same size), and this globe which he kept on his desk. He is missed.

I think I'll give Elton John's old lyricist Bernie Taupin the last word:

And I think it’s gonna be a long long time
Till touch down brings me round again to find
I’m not the man they think I am at home
Oh no no no I’m a rocket man
Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone

Have a good week!

[Note: I got much information about Arch and ARC from Philip Key Reily's book The Rocket Scientists.]

My other recent Monday Musings:
Francis Crick's Beautiful Mistake
The Man With Qualities
Special Relativity Turns 100
Vladimir Nabokov, Lepidopterist
Stevinus, Galileo, and Thought Experiments
Cake Theory and Sri Lanka's President

Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:00 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2953983

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Monday Musing: Rocket Man:

Comments

Thanks for introducing this great "rocket scientist" and his contribution to rocket science. I salute ARC for his research and innovation in this field! Perhaps spaceshuttle columbia would not have been possible without his work, at least not in the present time frame.

Posted by: Javed | Aug 8, 2005 7:35:43 AM

Some of the most fascinating problems in physics deal with projectiles. Everyone has thrown a ball up in the air only to have it reach a certain height and return. The laws of physics reveal the details of this and the relationship between initial speed of the ball and the heighth to which it rises. The concept of energy is the simplest way one can think of and explain this.
The ball is given a certain initial speed in a vertical upward direction. As it rises, the gravitational pull of the Earth slows it down until it reaches a point at the top of its path where its speed is instantaneously zero. At this point we say all its original kinetic energy has been converted to potential energy, or the work done by the gravitational force against its motion to reduce its speed. 1/2 m v(2) = mgh where m is the mass, v is its speed initially and h its heighth of travel. Since the m divides out, this leaves the speed squared equals the acceleration of gravity times the heighth. If one knows the speed, one can calculate h or vice versa. At the surface of the Earth, g is approximately 32 ft/sec/sec, but decreases with altitude, so this result is only approximate. We have also neglected for air resistance. This equation immediately tells us that on the Moon, for example, where g is about 1/6 of that on Earth, the ball would rise 6 times higher than on Earth for the same initial speed. Suppose one asked the question, What would the speed be for the ball to rise to infinity? Exactly the same procedure applies, except one must take into account the variation of g with distance from the center of the Earth. In this instance, instead of simply multiplying the weight times the heighth to obtain the work against gravity, one must add up each contribution of the work done by gravity over small intervals and integrate them from the radius of the Earth to infinity. The force of gravity is GMm/r(2) where M is the mass of the Earth, m is the mass of the object, G is the universal constant of gravitation and r the distance from the center of the Earth. On doing this one finds v(2) = 2(GM/R) = 2Rg where g is evaluated at the surface of the Earth. Using g = 32 ft/sec/sec and R= 4000 miles = 21 x 10(6) ft, one finds
v= about 36.9 x 10(3) ft/sec or dividing by 5280 ft/mile, = about 7 miles/sec. This is the escape velocity to leave the Earth completely. This is an easy number to remember, but it is better to change it into miles/hour to realize what a large speed it is:
Multiplying by 60 seconds/minute and 60 minutes/hour, one obtains about 25,000 miles/hr. This is the speed you would have to throw a ball up in the air for it to rise to infinity.
Because this speed is so large, a massive object, like a rocket, requires enormous amounts of energy to be provided to be placed into orbit around the Earth, or leave the Earth entirely. As Mr. Raza has described, this energy is often provided by solid fuel rockets, but the basic chemical constituent which provides the energy to do this is oxygen, the element which provides all energy for life, for automobile engines, for guns and rockets, all things non-nuclear.
Obviously, man was not intended to leave the Earth. It is vary difficult to do. Flying is also very difficult for many to accomplish and man was obviously not intended to fly.
Any birdwatcher has observed that newly born birds fly almost as soon as they have wings. The parents may hang around for the first or second flight, then they are gone. No bird doctors or nurses or bird engineers are around to aid in the process. Isn't it amazing that birds can fly with so much ease, but man has never learned to fly in the manner birds do, with vibrating wings? And yet, no bird can fly with a speed great enough to leave the Earth.
Isn't physics an amazing subject? In fact, one wonders why physics, mathematics and chemistry and engineering are not the only subjects taught at colleges and universities? Why would you not want to study these subjects in favor of most of that other politically correct garbage as Kimball describes in his enlightening book "Tenured Radicals How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education" by Roger Kimball, Harper & Row, N.Y., 1990?
This is an enlightening article by Mr. Raza.

Posted by: Winfield J. Abbe | Aug 8, 2005 8:35:52 AM

I don't want to be finicky, but a large number of evolutionists would have an issue with Mr. Abbe's use of the phrase "not intended" when referring to man's lack of ability to leave solid ground unaided. It is merely the way things have turned out, that's all. I know that's sort of what you intended, Winfield, but sentences such as the above sometimes lead to ambiguous, and even incorrect, conclusions.

And I'd imagine any bird born with the required genetic mutation to fly fast enough to escape the pull of earth's gravity isn't going to last long enough to pass it's genes on to the next generation (!).

Posted by: Cian | Aug 8, 2005 9:16:58 AM

Lively and witty as always, Abbas.

Posted by: J. M. Tyree | Aug 9, 2005 2:52:07 PM

On a minor note related to this: My dad worked at Atlantic Research Corporation in the mid-sixties. The headquarters building was a striking modernist structure visible from Shirley Highway, which later became I-95, about 8 miles south of the Pentagon. The building was located on the west side of the highway, a mile or two north of the I-95 beltway junction which today is undergoing a massive rebuilding. I worked at ARC as a mail boy the summer of 1964 and I remember working one weekend because there was a proxy fight going on for control of the company. We made a special run to the post office on a Saturday to pick up the mail with any proxy votes. I do not remember who was involved in that fight at the CEO Chairman of the Board level. It seems like to me there may have been a gentleman named Sloan who drove a Rolls involved along with Dr. Scurlock in the leadership of the company. The company owned land at Gainesville VA. at that time but had not developed it. I heard later the company moved to Gainesville and the modernist headquarters was torn down. Its very good to see this information about ARC and Dr. Scurlock.

Posted by: Joe Basilone | Jul 16, 2006 3:13:32 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed

Help 3 Quarks Daily

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD ADVERTISING



Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Please Visit Wikio

  • Wikio
  • Wikio Shopping
  • LCD Monitor
  • LCD TV
  • Recent Comments

    Nick Smyth on Religion Naturalized?

    Elatia Harris on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Winfield J. Abbe on Mysteries of time, and the multiverse

    Jim on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Sagredo on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    Ken D. on Sunday Poem

    Ken D. on Sunday Poem

    Elatia Harris on The Dysfunctional Jameses

    Dave Ranning on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Kevin on The Dysfunctional Jameses

    Sagredo on Remembering Jesse Helms

    cora on SAFFRON MOTHER, Part III

    Dave Ranning on Remembering Jesse Helms

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Remembering Jesse Helms

    missvolare on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    missvolare on Mysteries of time, and the multiverse

    Jim on Remembering Jesse Helms

    aditya on Mysteries of time, and the multiverse

    Damien on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    Dave Ranning on The Dysfunctional Jameses

    Jim on The Reverse Graffiti Project

    Dr Felix E F Larocca on The Mirror Neuron Revolution: Explaining What Makes Humans Social

    Felix E F Larocca MD on Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

    Felix E F Larocca MD on The Wisdom of Whores

    Acclaim For 3QD


    Best Non-European Weblog Winner


    Best Group Blog and Blog Most Deserving of Wider Attention Finalist


    Wikio - Top Blogs

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed